(((aliens)))
(twitter.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Only the fewest of them actually argue about substance, and even then it was about a formula which had a mass multiplier related to the speed of light, which would have been a decent argument if it wouldn't be based on a lack of understanding of it. Otherwise they bring up nothing of substance ever.
But here comes the fun part: Even if via extreme effort you can convince a singular flat Earther that he is wrong, it will have no effects on the others. It will rather reinforce their flat Earth beliefs and consider that person a lost cause. There is NOTHING you can bring up, no argument, evidence or proof that can change their minds on a large scale. Nothing.
I've conversed with a lot of flat Earthers by now, it's always the same. The same hopeless cause.
Nono, they are genuine. If there is a psy-op (which initially there might have been), there would be people who must have fallen for it. They are the ones who did.
> I'm actually interested if you remember it.
I think it was the relativistic momentum: p = y * m * u
Or it was the relativistic mass formula: m = m0 / (1 - v² / c²)^0.5
About the first one it was about something of an object repeatedly dropped generating infinite energy (which would be nonsensical therefore relativity debunked), and something about misunderstanding mass of an object and relativistic mass. I mean how do you explain to one of those the concept of the speed of light and relativity?