Buddy you dont understand the argument, and that's ok. You dont have to try to sperg out because someone reinforced what you already believed so you agreed, and people pointed out his argument had no substance.
You keep trying to argue the onus of burden of proof is on Bishop Richard Williamson, but that's false. That's why you "REEEEE" otherwise. THAT IS YOUR ARGUMENT.
If I say "apples are made of meat" I have to prove that.
Youre literally just made of logical fallacy. Just because you want to agree, *even if something is true*, doesnt make the ARGUMENT valid. God is INHERENTLY a matter of faith.
Youre literally just made of logical fallacy. Just because you want to agree, *even if something is true*, doesnt make the ARGUMENT valid. God is INHERENTLY a matter of faith.