You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
4 days ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Buddy you dont understand the argument, and that's ok. You dont have to try to sperg out because someone reinforced what you already believed so you agreed, and people pointed out his argument had no substance.
You keep trying to argue the onus of burden of proof is on Bishop Richard Williamson, but that's false. That's why you "REEEEE" otherwise. THAT IS YOUR ARGUMENT.
If I say "apples are made of meat" I have to prove that.
Youre literally just made of logical fallacy. Just because you want to agree, *even if something is true*, doesnt make the ARGUMENT valid. God is INHERENTLY a matter of faith.
Nope. You're contradicting your self. He made a statement that's been factually true forever, already established as the rule of natural law. Jews started saying otherwise recently and pretending they were the rule of law without ever providing proof of claim, but you forgot that and assume it's factual. That's why you are in error and deserve to have the fucking shit beaten out of you until you repent and correct your jewishness.
Youre literally just made of logical fallacy. Just because you want to agree, *even if something is true*, doesnt make the ARGUMENT valid. God is INHERENTLY a matter of faith.