Consume Product - Arete Network

CreepingCreeper on scored.co

2 days ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / )

Yeah, plus it's a yenta so rules don't apply to it anyway. That creature only wants to bring in a nigger kill squad to murder the Whites there, then snatch up the "vacant" land to create some kind of nigger habitat/pedo rape center.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

3

Dps1879 on scored.co

2 days ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

What if its based in her religion?

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

7

TallestSkil on scored.co

2 days ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

All the more reason for her to win, since jewish religious law is the foundation of the US.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

1

Dps1879 on scored.co

2 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / )

Ah!!

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

2

HarlechMan on scored.co

1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

Except she won't because she never even attempted to buy land in the first place, nor was there any land offered for sale. She applied for RTTL membership, and was denied. RTTL membership does not confer any land, nor is it anywhere inferred or implied that it does. The RTTL-related settlements are owned by a separate, private LLC that never puts the land on the open market. The criertia for ownership in the LLC shares is a whole other process adn RTTL as a whole is not involved.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

3

TallestSkil on scored.co

1 day ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

And I suppose you believe the court *won’t rule that the LLC is forced to put the land on the open market*, or that RTTL is forced to confer membership irrespective of race.

Why?

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

0

HarlechMan on scored.co

1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child

The latter point is easy. There is no law that forces RTTL to accept any one member. It is a Private Member Association which has clear exemptions from civil rights legislation. The cases where old race-specific clubs were broken up in involved them conducting business that made them public accomodations. RTTL does not lease out it's facilities to the general public.

The point about forcing the LLC on the open market would be a massive change in land ownership laws. There are tens of thousands of companies that own land in the US. And the ownership of these companies is private.

RTTL is approaching this in a deliberate manner and is hiring professionals to assist them. They have already weathered a few legal challenges and investigations. Sure, you could say that the courts will ignore the law and fuck them over. But in doing so they will further weaken the rule of law and undermine their own system. And if RTTL succeeds then it will be a great victory that will give us a clear path to be able to consolidate resources and community. And not only in rural areas, but suburbs and cities as well, given time and resources.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

1

TallestSkil on scored.co

1 day ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

>There are tens of thousands of companies that own land in the US. And the ownership of these companies is private.

Have you noticed the recent media push against BlackRock/Vanguard/State Street’s ownership of land? Specifically, certain types of accommodation on that land?

Get ready for an umbrella effect where NO company can own “single family homes.”

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

0

HarlechMan on scored.co

1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )

I am aware but without going into the weeds this wouldn't apply to the current setup, amd there are other vehicles (trusts, partnerships, etc.) that could work instead of the LLC model. There is not much to be done without nuking most shared-land ownership agreements, which would piss off the population at large and result in legal challenges to the state. See Texas's recent "anti sharia community" legislation.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

1

BlackPillBot on scored.co

1 day ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

She’ll likely win, but not because of all the legal gobbledygook that’ll be brought up, misinterpreted, and/or completely fabricated in her favor, but because she’s a kike with deeper pockets, connections, and protections that RTTL, and whites in general don’t.

With that said, she can buy all the land she wants, but if she tries to build anything, 🔥 in the early phases is the answer. One thing the RTTL members can add to their rules, and regs is that no surveillance devices are allowed anywhere within the area for anyone who decides to live there. If they do not abide, they forfeit the land. This will trap the demons in one of their own kikenundrums.

We have to be smarter than them, and often times it’s not that difficult. It just takes a little ingenuity, cohesion, and cooperation by all the whites choosing to live there. They have to stick together, and refuse to let these kikes scare, and divide them.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

1

HarlechMan on scored.co

1 day ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

There has been some information shared in the past about RTTL's rules and regs. They created the group from the get go with the plan to structure it so that bad actors (or unmanageable schizos for that matter) could be isolated from disrupting the group. So they're already on to what you're discussing.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

1

BlackPillBot on scored.co

1 day ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / )

Thanks for the info. It’s “funny” that white people are supposedly so dangerous, and hateful and yet this demonic yenta wants to move around these white “supremacists”. Shouldn’t she be glad that they are isolating themselves away from her beautiful diverse “utopia”? Yeah, I already know the answers.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co