New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
35
The Jewish Woman Suing Return to the Land for Discrimination (media.scored.co)
posted 2 days ago by Heliocentric on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +35Score on mirror )
26 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Except she won't because she never even attempted to buy land in the first place, nor was there any land offered for sale. She applied for RTTL membership, and was denied. RTTL membership does not confer any land, nor is it anywhere inferred or implied that it does. The RTTL-related settlements are owned by a separate, private LLC that never puts the land on the open market. The criertia for ownership in the LLC shares is a whole other process adn RTTL as a whole is not involved.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 day ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
And I suppose you believe the court *won’t rule that the LLC is forced to put the land on the open market*, or that RTTL is forced to confer membership irrespective of race.

Why?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The latter point is easy. There is no law that forces RTTL to accept any one member. It is a Private Member Association which has clear exemptions from civil rights legislation. The cases where old race-specific clubs were broken up in involved them conducting business that made them public accomodations. RTTL does not lease out it's facilities to the general public.

The point about forcing the LLC on the open market would be a massive change in land ownership laws. There are tens of thousands of companies that own land in the US. And the ownership of these companies is private.

RTTL is approaching this in a deliberate manner and is hiring professionals to assist them. They have already weathered a few legal challenges and investigations. Sure, you could say that the courts will ignore the law and fuck them over. But in doing so they will further weaken the rule of law and undermine their own system. And if RTTL succeeds then it will be a great victory that will give us a clear path to be able to consolidate resources and community. And not only in rural areas, but suburbs and cities as well, given time and resources.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 day ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>There are tens of thousands of companies that own land in the US. And the ownership of these companies is private.

Have you noticed the recent media push against BlackRock/Vanguard/State Street’s ownership of land? Specifically, certain types of accommodation on that land?

Get ready for an umbrella effect where NO company can own “single family homes.”
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I am aware but without going into the weeds this wouldn't apply to the current setup, amd there are other vehicles (trusts, partnerships, etc.) that could work instead of the LLC model. There is not much to be done without nuking most shared-land ownership agreements, which would piss off the population at large and result in legal challenges to the state. See Texas's recent "anti sharia community" legislation.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message