Consume Product

You can tell your black friend is being controlled by ideology, don't follow in their footsteps. Trust no one.

They know they don't belong and they take it out on all of us

And a conservative would say that sounds pretty conservative. Break the chains or be subject to them.

> from the mastery of their linguistic tricks.

I am reluctant to call it "mastery", because it's just superficial, dumb bullshitting tactics, sophistry for the dumb. The problem is that people, who should be able to dismantle these linguistic tricks, struggle to do so, even though it's simple.

It's more about the persistence to the bullshitting, the insolence and shamelessness to use tricks to no end.

Anything can work in a small populated white society.

It's like group projects in school. Take the best kids and put them in a group, it doesn't matter how they organize themselves, it's going to work. Same is true but in reverse for the worst. Doesn't matter how you organize them, they're still going to fail.

Except they want non-Whites and communists to own guns as well. They can be right on a topic, but they always take it to retarded limits.

I think that a community recognizing the talents of its individual members is still quite a collectivist thing. Because, as you said, it's recognizing their abilities and how they can contribute to overall wellbeing.

Simply put, we cannot survive if we do not look out for one another. This is the most base instinct on the planet, even niggers can fully comprehend it, but somehow the western world has just forgotten about it due to specific strains of enlightenment ideology (definitely *not* all of it though, a common misconception, but the theories engendered by anglo-centric liberalism in particular. The "collectivist and statist" liberalism arising from france ironically forms the primary backbone against it, even if not envisioned by its authors and philosophers. This is where people like Mussolini, Hitler, and JAPR among others can find their deepest ancestral ideological roots)

The way I see it is as follows: literally everything is based on enlightenment era liberalism in some variety. Genuine reaction is utterly moribund. So which one do you choose? The "anglo-dutch" liberalism of being in perpetual antagonism towards the state, liberty *in spite of* the state? Or do you fall into the camp of "romance" liberalism, where liberty is engendered by the state which executes whatever is in the best interests of its constituents? The former is bound to result in a low trust and negative society no matter what, because if it creates in people, by default, a hatred towards the state and its institutions, the state will respond in turn by hating its people, and it empowers people who are asocial and all other sorts of bad actors because it rewards this behavior. The latter is volatile and can end in absolute catastrophe when it is used in the hands of bad actors, such as the bolsheviks, but it can also create beauty and renewed vigor for a nation and its people, such as fascism et al.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/filer_public/44/fd/44fdb4f0-33c2-4993-8087-3e862183c1de/2024-irreplaceable-role-factsheet.pdf

Not enough brown and blacks, but a majority are the customers and the majority are at 150% of the poverty level or less.

So, abortion controls the pet population.