23 hours ago20 points(+0/-0/+20Score on mirror)4 children
I'd love to know exactly when this became "problematic". Like when exactly did people begin to genuinely believe that a random thug's life was worth more than their property.
23 hours ago16 points(+0/-0/+16Score on mirror)2 children
Egalitarian rot.
The life of a righteous man and the life of a man who raped and murdered someone are fundamentally of equal value, so saith this age. Any punishment you may devise for the murdering rapist must be considered in light of the fact that his life is just as "precious" to God as that of the righteous man. And any leniency you may show for the mistakes of the righteous man must be considered in light of the fact that he's basically a murdering rapist at heart.
> the murdering rapist ... his life is just as "precious" to God as that of the righteous man ... the righteous man ... he's basically a murdering rapist at heart.
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.
9 hours ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
I would argue that stealing my property is also an act of violence. If I work 40 hours to earn money to buy something, and that something is stolen or destroyed, the thief took a piece of my life that I am entitled to.
I don't think that the death penalty is the *best* solution but, considering we refuse to enslave criminals to force them to provide value in exchange for what they destroyed, it may be the *only* solution available.
The Rousseauian position, which is fully codified in blue states, is that even if you are being murdered, you still don't have the right to commit an act of violence, not even to prevent yourself from being murdered. They would argue that the only thing you have the right to do is call the police and hope they give a damn, and only the police are allowed to do anything about the murderer.
Rousseau also wrote that the state has the right to kill you for any reason it wants, and that if it orders you to commit suicide, you have a moral duty to kill yourself.
My position is that violence should not only belong to the state. That's not how America worked at all, until after Judea's war on Germany. Our grandfathers didn't just leave everything to the police. Men back then would beat up faggots, pedos, and niggers who went where they weren't welcome on sight, without fear of legal repercussions. The modern way of never engaging in any violence no matter what was imposed on us by people who have been edjewcated to believe in Rousseauian and Marxian ideas.
What I’ve always explained to people, is it’s not even JUST the property. It’s the exchange of time, energy, and/or resources that you had to expend in order to attain, and gain said property. I also love the low IQ ones who try to say but “hurr durr, that’s what insurance is for”, as if that’s free, and it doesn’t cause rates to go up even higher than they already are. That’s if whatever is stolen is worth the deductible. Lots of time your just SOL.
15 hours ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
I hate our meth and homelessness epidemic (they often go together).
We never had these problems 20 years ago.
Back then, if someone was sleeping on a footpath, two cop cars and a fire engine was called to see if they were OK.
99% of these people are victims of our jewed economy and our jewed culture: they injured themselves at work, were fired, lost their wife and children and became homeless.
It's almost impossible for many of these people to get a job without an address to get their ID, without clean clothing, without some of their teeth and without self worth.
So they slowly give up and escape into substances.
It's fun to be edgy, but the truth is these people are victims of ZOG and the ((( subversion ))) of all of our critical institutions.
Many try, but discover working low skilled shift work at three jobs for 60 hours a week will barely cover rent, food and medicine. It's a choice between two downward spirals.
12 hours ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
>99% of these people are victims of our jewed economy and our jewed culture: they injured themselves at work, were fired, lost their wife and children and became homeless.
Severely doubt that stat.
All the ones I've ever known were worthless pieces of shit their entire lives.
You couldn't give them a job that they immediately didn't start stealing from, or just quit as soon as they got enough drug money put aside to go off on a two week bender.
Agreed. The zogged part comes from not forcibly rehabilitating and then employing them as menial labour until they've paid their debt to society. I am fully in favour of enslaving criminals, btw.
The reason these tweakers get out of hand is because they're allowed to. Somebody beats up their woman or takes a dump in someone else's car, and the meth is used as an excuse, not an aggravating factor to make the sentence worse.
Open question for every White Supremicist on here:
What do we do with these people? The vast majority, at least where I live, are White. But they also do *at least* as much damage to the Whites around them as niggers and jeets.
Do we treat them as fellow Whites who just need to smarten up? Or are they dead wood that needs to be removed? Or something in between?
The life of a righteous man and the life of a man who raped and murdered someone are fundamentally of equal value, so saith this age. Any punishment you may devise for the murdering rapist must be considered in light of the fact that his life is just as "precious" to God as that of the righteous man. And any leniency you may show for the mistakes of the righteous man must be considered in light of the fact that he's basically a murdering rapist at heart.
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.
I don't think that the death penalty is the *best* solution but, considering we refuse to enslave criminals to force them to provide value in exchange for what they destroyed, it may be the *only* solution available.
Rousseau also wrote that the state has the right to kill you for any reason it wants, and that if it orders you to commit suicide, you have a moral duty to kill yourself.
My position is that violence should not only belong to the state. That's not how America worked at all, until after Judea's war on Germany. Our grandfathers didn't just leave everything to the police. Men back then would beat up faggots, pedos, and niggers who went where they weren't welcome on sight, without fear of legal repercussions. The modern way of never engaging in any violence no matter what was imposed on us by people who have been edjewcated to believe in Rousseauian and Marxian ideas.