Was in Canada with my uncle. He told me the city has had several overpasses damaged by trucks smashing into them and wonders why this is happening. I tell him the obvious answer - indian truck drivers.
All the sudden he looks at me and in the deepest, most demonic voice says "you better shut the fuck up if you know what's good for ya". Then reverts back to a completely normal tone and changes the subject entirely.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
12
RussianWarCriminal on scored.co
29 days ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)3 children
Reminds of some Canadian tourists whose ride broke down here a while back, so they were stuck. I offered to give them a ride and they agreed. But then they saw that I had rifles in my truck (I live in bumfuck nowhere country with wildlife everywhere) they aggressively refused and said "there's no reason anyone would ever need a gun". LOL. Apparently this is normal sentiment among people in places like Toronto and Vancouver.
28 days ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
I don't know. It sounds like pampered city people who are retarded deprived of grass to touch.
I mean I don't have guns, and I don't need one. Yet. I do have however 2 swords and 6 machetes. And if someone would decide to break in, I'd kill him and bury him in the yard. Nobody would look for him at my place.
MAYBE I could tell the government it was an act of self-defence, but why have that risk? Especially if it's some brand of subhuman. Some fucked judge is enough to ruin my life because muh' excessive force or whatever. So what he ended up in pieces of subhuman cubes?
28 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
I mean I love me some blades too. They're just way cooler than firearms imo. But I still gotta ask: Why? If you're already that committed to defending your home, why not acquire the best tool for the job?
28 days ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
Idk man the piglike squealing of a nigger as you chop him to bits would be pretty loud. And more sustained than a gunshot. And if you're in a multiple attackers situation it's a hell of a lot riskier.
Well, imagine you want to rob a house in the night, and as you enter there is suddenly a guy in the dark who holds 2 machetes and smiles at you like a madman.
The sheer psycho-terror it can cause can be quite interesting. If he manages to run away and talk to others about that crazy whypepo, that alone ensures they won't get near you again. You will gain a reputation for not being messed with.
Of course it means nothing if you are not ready to chop him down if you catch him. And if you injure him, don't let him escape. Don't leave any evidence behind.
See it in a utilitarian way. But nobody said you can't enjoy it.
28 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
I was in the military for a short time, and I did operate 3 types of guns. So I am not averse to guns fundamentally, but here in Hungary guns are not needed. In the US I'd probably only go well armed outside.
But yeah, noise also matters. If you fire a gun, people will wake up, will be curious and may call the police. That makes it inevitable that you justify yourself before the police about how it was self-defense.
In the Bundeswehr I used the pistol P8, which was surprisingly difficult to hit with. Just little motions left and right could totally screw up aiming.
Then there was the G36. It was the rifle which was assigned to us, so we often walked around with it. It's much easier to aim with it, so a long barrel and the ability to hold a gun properly with two hands helped a lot.
Then there was the MG3. It's a machine gun, but you'd be surprised how accurate it can be. If you lean into it (as you had to) when crawling, aim well, it's very accurate. Of all 3 guns I had best accuracy with that one.
There was some bronze/silver/gold thing for target practice, I made gold for all except for P8 (silver). I only tried all once, so in my short time I almost had the badge of weapon marksmanship.
28 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
That makes sense. Non-US context is a lot more plausible than over here where it seems like every nigger has some cheap pistol in the pockets of his sagging jeans.
Even still, I imagine you'd need even more training for blades to be an effective way to put someone down quickly and quietly. What would you do against multiple armed attackers?
I have 15+ years of experience using machetes (I always use two). With swords not so much, but machetes are essentially a combination of axes and swords. They can be wielded like swords but cut almost as well as axes, granting high accuracy and strong cutting power.
I can cut a leaf in half that hangs from a brush or small tree, and I do use them for 20-40 minutes per session.
What would I do with multiple invaders? First of all, either I try the psycho-terror approach, or I don't let them think and charge immediately. In both cases I wouldn't say a word. If you talk, you can be negotiated with. In the first case it's detrimental to causing fear, in the second case it's pointless and detrimental.
It depends on the situation, you have thrust (swords only, can be lethal, but won't stop them immediately), cut (swords and machetes, a swing with full force for devastating damage that can stop them), slash (you pull the sword for superficial injuries, here it's only pain).
A sword needs to be held with 2 hands as it needs more control (their grip is generally long enough to be held with 2 hands), machetes however can be dual wielded pretty well (grip for 1 hand only).
I'd attack them violently without giving them a moment of pause, aiming for 1. preventing them from fleeing, 2. lethality. If they do have weapons, I'd focus on slashing or cutting their arms holding them. With 2 machetes you can strike one's weapon and with the other his head. If they stand in formation, I'd go for one on the side to avoid getting surrounded. If they have guns, that's a problem.
If I have the advantage of stealth, I'd use it. No need to waste it to announce myself. Just the advantage of closing the distance a little faster is enough.
And yet they accuse the government of being evil fascists if anyone to the right of a towel headed curry nigger gets elected.
Okay? So Trump is an evil fascist? Then why would you only want Trump and the feds to have guns? Shouldn't we the common people all arm ourselves against Trump and the evil fascists Republicans?
"derrr uhhhh ummmmm *blank stare" - Democrats
However, at the psy-op SPLC United the Right protest, the democrats formed gangs with AR-15s and that Professor Dixon and his communist kike loving democrat friends were chasing James Fields around with AR-15's in a school zone, where firearms are strictly prohibited. So the laws do not apply to Democrats nor does the logical or rationale for any of this stuff. They just want you dead and it's not about laws or principles or rights or any of that sugar coated debate tactic shit.
I mean I don't have guns, and I don't need one. Yet. I do have however 2 swords and 6 machetes. And if someone would decide to break in, I'd kill him and bury him in the yard. Nobody would look for him at my place.
MAYBE I could tell the government it was an act of self-defence, but why have that risk? Especially if it's some brand of subhuman. Some fucked judge is enough to ruin my life because muh' excessive force or whatever. So what he ended up in pieces of subhuman cubes?
The sheer psycho-terror it can cause can be quite interesting. If he manages to run away and talk to others about that crazy whypepo, that alone ensures they won't get near you again. You will gain a reputation for not being messed with.
Of course it means nothing if you are not ready to chop him down if you catch him. And if you injure him, don't let him escape. Don't leave any evidence behind.
See it in a utilitarian way. But nobody said you can't enjoy it.
But yeah, noise also matters. If you fire a gun, people will wake up, will be curious and may call the police. That makes it inevitable that you justify yourself before the police about how it was self-defense.
In the Bundeswehr I used the pistol P8, which was surprisingly difficult to hit with. Just little motions left and right could totally screw up aiming.
Then there was the G36. It was the rifle which was assigned to us, so we often walked around with it. It's much easier to aim with it, so a long barrel and the ability to hold a gun properly with two hands helped a lot.
Then there was the MG3. It's a machine gun, but you'd be surprised how accurate it can be. If you lean into it (as you had to) when crawling, aim well, it's very accurate. Of all 3 guns I had best accuracy with that one.
There was some bronze/silver/gold thing for target practice, I made gold for all except for P8 (silver). I only tried all once, so in my short time I almost had the badge of weapon marksmanship.
Even still, I imagine you'd need even more training for blades to be an effective way to put someone down quickly and quietly. What would you do against multiple armed attackers?
I can cut a leaf in half that hangs from a brush or small tree, and I do use them for 20-40 minutes per session.
What would I do with multiple invaders? First of all, either I try the psycho-terror approach, or I don't let them think and charge immediately. In both cases I wouldn't say a word. If you talk, you can be negotiated with. In the first case it's detrimental to causing fear, in the second case it's pointless and detrimental.
It depends on the situation, you have thrust (swords only, can be lethal, but won't stop them immediately), cut (swords and machetes, a swing with full force for devastating damage that can stop them), slash (you pull the sword for superficial injuries, here it's only pain).
A sword needs to be held with 2 hands as it needs more control (their grip is generally long enough to be held with 2 hands), machetes however can be dual wielded pretty well (grip for 1 hand only).
I'd attack them violently without giving them a moment of pause, aiming for 1. preventing them from fleeing, 2. lethality. If they do have weapons, I'd focus on slashing or cutting their arms holding them. With 2 machetes you can strike one's weapon and with the other his head. If they stand in formation, I'd go for one on the side to avoid getting surrounded. If they have guns, that's a problem.
If I have the advantage of stealth, I'd use it. No need to waste it to announce myself. Just the advantage of closing the distance a little faster is enough.
I don't want to live in a community with people who only want jew ZOGbots to have guns
Okay? So Trump is an evil fascist? Then why would you only want Trump and the feds to have guns? Shouldn't we the common people all arm ourselves against Trump and the evil fascists Republicans?
"derrr uhhhh ummmmm *blank stare" - Democrats
However, at the psy-op SPLC United the Right protest, the democrats formed gangs with AR-15s and that Professor Dixon and his communist kike loving democrat friends were chasing James Fields around with AR-15's in a school zone, where firearms are strictly prohibited. So the laws do not apply to Democrats nor does the logical or rationale for any of this stuff. They just want you dead and it's not about laws or principles or rights or any of that sugar coated debate tactic shit.