Was in Canada with my uncle. He told me the city has had several overpasses damaged by trucks smashing into them and wonders why this is happening. I tell him the obvious answer - indian truck drivers.
All the sudden he looks at me and in the deepest, most demonic voice says "you better shut the fuck up if you know what's good for ya". Then reverts back to a completely normal tone and changes the subject entirely.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
Breadpilled on scored.co
28 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
That makes sense. Non-US context is a lot more plausible than over here where it seems like every nigger has some cheap pistol in the pockets of his sagging jeans.
Even still, I imagine you'd need even more training for blades to be an effective way to put someone down quickly and quietly. What would you do against multiple armed attackers?
I have 15+ years of experience using machetes (I always use two). With swords not so much, but machetes are essentially a combination of axes and swords. They can be wielded like swords but cut almost as well as axes, granting high accuracy and strong cutting power.
I can cut a leaf in half that hangs from a brush or small tree, and I do use them for 20-40 minutes per session.
What would I do with multiple invaders? First of all, either I try the psycho-terror approach, or I don't let them think and charge immediately. In both cases I wouldn't say a word. If you talk, you can be negotiated with. In the first case it's detrimental to causing fear, in the second case it's pointless and detrimental.
It depends on the situation, you have thrust (swords only, can be lethal, but won't stop them immediately), cut (swords and machetes, a swing with full force for devastating damage that can stop them), slash (you pull the sword for superficial injuries, here it's only pain).
A sword needs to be held with 2 hands as it needs more control (their grip is generally long enough to be held with 2 hands), machetes however can be dual wielded pretty well (grip for 1 hand only).
I'd attack them violently without giving them a moment of pause, aiming for 1. preventing them from fleeing, 2. lethality. If they do have weapons, I'd focus on slashing or cutting their arms holding them. With 2 machetes you can strike one's weapon and with the other his head. If they stand in formation, I'd go for one on the side to avoid getting surrounded. If they have guns, that's a problem.
If I have the advantage of stealth, I'd use it. No need to waste it to announce myself. Just the advantage of closing the distance a little faster is enough.
Even still, I imagine you'd need even more training for blades to be an effective way to put someone down quickly and quietly. What would you do against multiple armed attackers?
I can cut a leaf in half that hangs from a brush or small tree, and I do use them for 20-40 minutes per session.
What would I do with multiple invaders? First of all, either I try the psycho-terror approach, or I don't let them think and charge immediately. In both cases I wouldn't say a word. If you talk, you can be negotiated with. In the first case it's detrimental to causing fear, in the second case it's pointless and detrimental.
It depends on the situation, you have thrust (swords only, can be lethal, but won't stop them immediately), cut (swords and machetes, a swing with full force for devastating damage that can stop them), slash (you pull the sword for superficial injuries, here it's only pain).
A sword needs to be held with 2 hands as it needs more control (their grip is generally long enough to be held with 2 hands), machetes however can be dual wielded pretty well (grip for 1 hand only).
I'd attack them violently without giving them a moment of pause, aiming for 1. preventing them from fleeing, 2. lethality. If they do have weapons, I'd focus on slashing or cutting their arms holding them. With 2 machetes you can strike one's weapon and with the other his head. If they stand in formation, I'd go for one on the side to avoid getting surrounded. If they have guns, that's a problem.
If I have the advantage of stealth, I'd use it. No need to waste it to announce myself. Just the advantage of closing the distance a little faster is enough.