> So you, the Hungarian, are the expert on American fed honeypot activist groups?
I wouldn't call myself an expert, but it is not difficult to surpass your level of knowledge. I know too much about the US as it is.
There is NOTHING that could convince people like you to support or join any pro-White organization. Nothing. No matter how perfect they are - because then they are obviously feds, because they are too perfect, right?
Damn, where are all the worthless beer belly boomers hugging their based faggots, trannies and niggers as they march with Patriot Front as they worship Trump?! Clearly they are feds!
If they oppose niggers, it's a honeypot to catch racists.
If they oppose faggotry, it's a honeypot to catch homophobes.
If they name the jew, it's a honeypot to catch evil Nazis.
If they help Whites while the government is useless, they are a honeypot to catch evil Nazis.
If they march to get attention, showing physical fitness, organization and discipline, thus get more popular, ***because it works***, they are a honeypot to catch evil Nazis.
And it's a honeypot over what crimes? None?... Oh, there's the logical flaw. They commit no crimes and explicitly state that they won't. There is nothing to catch them for, as wrong-think isn't outlawed in the US, yet.
You have infinite excuses as to explain your laziness, cowardice, carelessness, and then feel smart about it, right? At least admit it without being smug about it.
You're very invested in my opinion for someone who isn't a kike fed. But all your arguments are "here's a poem with metaphors about how dumb I think you are and projection about what I think dumb people do" and not any refutation other than pure assertion.
> You're very invested in my opinion for someone who isn't a kike fed.
You overestimate your importance. To me it's mild entertainment, a distraction from my work. I blame myself for falling for it - and I am doing it again right now.
> here's a poem with metaphors
I think you should read again instead of fantasizing what I would write. I was quite explicit, and I have no interest in dealing with your hallucinations. I feel a little like my words are completely wasted. Which hey, I expected this, but it still stings a little.
For example you could answer if there is anything that could ever convince you to support or join any pro-White cause. Because apparently the answer is a clear "no."
> and not any refutation
Refute what? Linking government agencies, therefore... it's a honeypot? That one was beyond retarded. The key was to click the links to see that you had no argument.
> Why can you assert but I cannot?
Because you lack the ability to do so, but I do not? Do you have anything more to offer than these 4 pointless links?
> Because you're a eurotrash faggot.
Oh, and I thought I am a fed kike? So what is it now, feckless, niggerfaggot loving, boomer cuckservative? Don't get overrun by all those fat fucks in the scooters at Walmart!
> I say "feds can do philanthropy, especially when otherwise idle"
Which is a superfluous statement because we ***know*** there are government agencies that have the purpose to do that. That is completely unrelated to the post though.
Your point is, which apparently I have to tell you your own point, is that PF is secretly a government organization with the purpose of entrapping people, and that they pull philanthropic causes as a PR stunt to lure more members in before the trap snaps.
What you stated is just thoughtless. It doesn't serve your actual point. You should have posted links (or just one) to honeypot operations where philanthropy was used to improve the trap. THAT would have been a good point. For controversial topics you can also use yandex.com to find sources btw.
> showing the logical fallacy no true scotsman
You showed your lack of ability to apply reasoning more than anything else. Feel free to try better though, I will address it if you do.
If you'd have done better, you wouldn't have been downvoted so much. It's really a lack of quality more than anything else. Because that mindless garbage is seen a LOT among trumptards and cuckservatives.
I wouldn't call myself an expert, but it is not difficult to surpass your level of knowledge. I know too much about the US as it is.
There is NOTHING that could convince people like you to support or join any pro-White organization. Nothing. No matter how perfect they are - because then they are obviously feds, because they are too perfect, right?
Damn, where are all the worthless beer belly boomers hugging their based faggots, trannies and niggers as they march with Patriot Front as they worship Trump?! Clearly they are feds!
If they oppose niggers, it's a honeypot to catch racists.
If they oppose faggotry, it's a honeypot to catch homophobes.
If they name the jew, it's a honeypot to catch evil Nazis.
If they help Whites while the government is useless, they are a honeypot to catch evil Nazis.
If they march to get attention, showing physical fitness, organization and discipline, thus get more popular, ***because it works***, they are a honeypot to catch evil Nazis.
And it's a honeypot over what crimes? None?... Oh, there's the logical flaw. They commit no crimes and explicitly state that they won't. There is nothing to catch them for, as wrong-think isn't outlawed in the US, yet.
You have infinite excuses as to explain your laziness, cowardice, carelessness, and then feel smart about it, right? At least admit it without being smug about it.
Why can you assert but I cannot?
Because you're a eurotrash faggot.
You overestimate your importance. To me it's mild entertainment, a distraction from my work. I blame myself for falling for it - and I am doing it again right now.
> here's a poem with metaphors
I think you should read again instead of fantasizing what I would write. I was quite explicit, and I have no interest in dealing with your hallucinations. I feel a little like my words are completely wasted. Which hey, I expected this, but it still stings a little.
For example you could answer if there is anything that could ever convince you to support or join any pro-White cause. Because apparently the answer is a clear "no."
> and not any refutation
Refute what? Linking government agencies, therefore... it's a honeypot? That one was beyond retarded. The key was to click the links to see that you had no argument.
> Why can you assert but I cannot?
Because you lack the ability to do so, but I do not? Do you have anything more to offer than these 4 pointless links?
> Because you're a eurotrash faggot.
Oh, and I thought I am a fed kike? So what is it now, feckless, niggerfaggot loving, boomer cuckservative? Don't get overrun by all those fat fucks in the scooters at Walmart!
OP implies "they aren't feds because they do philanthropy"
I say "feds can do philanthropy, especially when otherwise idle", showing the logical fallacy *no true scotsman*
You say "no, those are federal philanthropy"
Yeah no shit dickweed.
Which is a superfluous statement because we ***know*** there are government agencies that have the purpose to do that. That is completely unrelated to the post though.
Your point is, which apparently I have to tell you your own point, is that PF is secretly a government organization with the purpose of entrapping people, and that they pull philanthropic causes as a PR stunt to lure more members in before the trap snaps.
What you stated is just thoughtless. It doesn't serve your actual point. You should have posted links (or just one) to honeypot operations where philanthropy was used to improve the trap. THAT would have been a good point. For controversial topics you can also use yandex.com to find sources btw.
> showing the logical fallacy no true scotsman
You showed your lack of ability to apply reasoning more than anything else. Feel free to try better though, I will address it if you do.
If you'd have done better, you wouldn't have been downvoted so much. It's really a lack of quality more than anything else. Because that mindless garbage is seen a LOT among trumptards and cuckservatives.