> I say "feds can do philanthropy, especially when otherwise idle"
Which is a superfluous statement because we ***know*** there are government agencies that have the purpose to do that. That is completely unrelated to the post though.
Your point is, which apparently I have to tell you your own point, is that PF is secretly a government organization with the purpose of entrapping people, and that they pull philanthropic causes as a PR stunt to lure more members in before the trap snaps.
What you stated is just thoughtless. It doesn't serve your actual point. You should have posted links (or just one) to honeypot operations where philanthropy was used to improve the trap. THAT would have been a good point. For controversial topics you can also use yandex.com to find sources btw.
> showing the logical fallacy no true scotsman
You showed your lack of ability to apply reasoning more than anything else. Feel free to try better though, I will address it if you do.
If you'd have done better, you wouldn't have been downvoted so much. It's really a lack of quality more than anything else. Because that mindless garbage is seen a LOT among trumptards and cuckservatives.
I was busy and you are irrelevant to me. Your entertainment value has dropped to zero. I hoped you just made a stupid statement and we could assess it, but your stupidity is so thorough and persistent, that it's completely hopeless.
Go watch niggerball and drink beer, that should suit you.
OP implies "they aren't feds because they do philanthropy"
I say "feds can do philanthropy, especially when otherwise idle", showing the logical fallacy *no true scotsman*
You say "no, those are federal philanthropy"
Yeah no shit dickweed.
Which is a superfluous statement because we ***know*** there are government agencies that have the purpose to do that. That is completely unrelated to the post though.
Your point is, which apparently I have to tell you your own point, is that PF is secretly a government organization with the purpose of entrapping people, and that they pull philanthropic causes as a PR stunt to lure more members in before the trap snaps.
What you stated is just thoughtless. It doesn't serve your actual point. You should have posted links (or just one) to honeypot operations where philanthropy was used to improve the trap. THAT would have been a good point. For controversial topics you can also use yandex.com to find sources btw.
> showing the logical fallacy no true scotsman
You showed your lack of ability to apply reasoning more than anything else. Feel free to try better though, I will address it if you do.
If you'd have done better, you wouldn't have been downvoted so much. It's really a lack of quality more than anything else. Because that mindless garbage is seen a LOT among trumptards and cuckservatives.
How many more ways can you say nothing?
Every word is wasted on you, you low-IQ imbecile. Your arguments are just as terrible as your ability to read and comprehend.
Go watch niggerball and drink beer, that should suit you.