You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
IGOexiled on scored.co
9 months ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
You're very invested in my opinion for someone who isn't a kike fed. But all your arguments are "here's a poem with metaphors about how dumb I think you are and projection about what I think dumb people do" and not any refutation other than pure assertion.
> You're very invested in my opinion for someone who isn't a kike fed.
You overestimate your importance. To me it's mild entertainment, a distraction from my work. I blame myself for falling for it - and I am doing it again right now.
> here's a poem with metaphors
I think you should read again instead of fantasizing what I would write. I was quite explicit, and I have no interest in dealing with your hallucinations. I feel a little like my words are completely wasted. Which hey, I expected this, but it still stings a little.
For example you could answer if there is anything that could ever convince you to support or join any pro-White cause. Because apparently the answer is a clear "no."
> and not any refutation
Refute what? Linking government agencies, therefore... it's a honeypot? That one was beyond retarded. The key was to click the links to see that you had no argument.
> Why can you assert but I cannot?
Because you lack the ability to do so, but I do not? Do you have anything more to offer than these 4 pointless links?
> Because you're a eurotrash faggot.
Oh, and I thought I am a fed kike? So what is it now, feckless, niggerfaggot loving, boomer cuckservative? Don't get overrun by all those fat fucks in the scooters at Walmart!
> I say "feds can do philanthropy, especially when otherwise idle"
Which is a superfluous statement because we ***know*** there are government agencies that have the purpose to do that. That is completely unrelated to the post though.
Your point is, which apparently I have to tell you your own point, is that PF is secretly a government organization with the purpose of entrapping people, and that they pull philanthropic causes as a PR stunt to lure more members in before the trap snaps.
What you stated is just thoughtless. It doesn't serve your actual point. You should have posted links (or just one) to honeypot operations where philanthropy was used to improve the trap. THAT would have been a good point. For controversial topics you can also use yandex.com to find sources btw.
> showing the logical fallacy no true scotsman
You showed your lack of ability to apply reasoning more than anything else. Feel free to try better though, I will address it if you do.
If you'd have done better, you wouldn't have been downvoted so much. It's really a lack of quality more than anything else. Because that mindless garbage is seen a LOT among trumptards and cuckservatives.
Why can you assert but I cannot?
Because you're a eurotrash faggot.
You overestimate your importance. To me it's mild entertainment, a distraction from my work. I blame myself for falling for it - and I am doing it again right now.
> here's a poem with metaphors
I think you should read again instead of fantasizing what I would write. I was quite explicit, and I have no interest in dealing with your hallucinations. I feel a little like my words are completely wasted. Which hey, I expected this, but it still stings a little.
For example you could answer if there is anything that could ever convince you to support or join any pro-White cause. Because apparently the answer is a clear "no."
> and not any refutation
Refute what? Linking government agencies, therefore... it's a honeypot? That one was beyond retarded. The key was to click the links to see that you had no argument.
> Why can you assert but I cannot?
Because you lack the ability to do so, but I do not? Do you have anything more to offer than these 4 pointless links?
> Because you're a eurotrash faggot.
Oh, and I thought I am a fed kike? So what is it now, feckless, niggerfaggot loving, boomer cuckservative? Don't get overrun by all those fat fucks in the scooters at Walmart!
OP implies "they aren't feds because they do philanthropy"
I say "feds can do philanthropy, especially when otherwise idle", showing the logical fallacy *no true scotsman*
You say "no, those are federal philanthropy"
Yeah no shit dickweed.
Which is a superfluous statement because we ***know*** there are government agencies that have the purpose to do that. That is completely unrelated to the post though.
Your point is, which apparently I have to tell you your own point, is that PF is secretly a government organization with the purpose of entrapping people, and that they pull philanthropic causes as a PR stunt to lure more members in before the trap snaps.
What you stated is just thoughtless. It doesn't serve your actual point. You should have posted links (or just one) to honeypot operations where philanthropy was used to improve the trap. THAT would have been a good point. For controversial topics you can also use yandex.com to find sources btw.
> showing the logical fallacy no true scotsman
You showed your lack of ability to apply reasoning more than anything else. Feel free to try better though, I will address it if you do.
If you'd have done better, you wouldn't have been downvoted so much. It's really a lack of quality more than anything else. Because that mindless garbage is seen a LOT among trumptards and cuckservatives.
How many more ways can you say nothing?
Every word is wasted on you, you low-IQ imbecile. Your arguments are just as terrible as your ability to read and comprehend.