New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I've even seen this one pop up from time to time among our own. The idea that the first patriarchal society to step foot in Europe were the indo Europeans is almost, beyond question, a fat fucking lie.

The dominant group in Europe prior to them were the early european farmers. Who shared their blood with Mesopotamian people (as in, they were already closely related to them, and apart from migrating into Europe, they also migrated in significant quantities into the levant). Name a single matriarchal Mesopotamian civilization, and we are supposed to believe that their brothers were somehow matriarchal? Okay. Sounds jewish.

The people before them were the western hunter gatherers. Who probably weren't matriarchal either, because most non-niggers never have been, although they never achieved enough for it to matter. So it's trivial.

What's the goal of this psyop though? It's two pronged. One prong is to make normies think that patriarchy is evil and that it was forced upon the peaceful hippie matriarchal ancient Europeans by insane blood drinking asiatic invaders. The second prong is to make right wingers believe that half or more of their dna is made up of the blood useless pushover faggots, when in reality half of your blood is made up of the first builders of civilization in human history and its something to take pride in. Jews don't want you to, because they've never built anything.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Knight_Of_Saint_John on scored.co
9 months ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
That's the first time i heard of it

Afaik only a few African tribes had Matriarchy, and those were long conquered by niggers who didn't follow the same mentality

As for the Levant, its hard to say i haven't read any record saying Summeria was lead by women

I have read they allowed immigration (semitic, asiatics and negroids) to an extent and after a period of time a horde of semitics, asiatics and negroids overran their civilization and thus they became Babylon
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
9 months ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
Matriarchy is antithetical to civilization; that's why you see it almost exclusively in primitivr cultures where they largely live off the land, rather than large agricultural projects (tilled fields feeding a village or city, irrigation etc).

That and Jews, who are also antithetical to civilization.
Knight_Of_Saint_John on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Yeah, only jews survived as a wimminz dominated tribe of cucks and schemers

Ironic to think no civilization had the balls to genocide them proper
devotech2 on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Even the alleged matriarchy of the jews is another big ass lie that they seem to disregard and not acknowledge whenever it's convenient. If a jewish man has children with a non Jewish woman, by their "law" the child would NOT be a jew, but they will still claim the child as a jew anyway. What's really bizarre is that, apparently, they have materilineal descent... but they always take their fathers names for some reason.

If they stood on their own principles, then israels leadership would be dominated by women. But I can't think of a single woman that holds any power in Israel whatsoever. Nor can I think of any jewish female religious leaders or... anything. Straight sausage fest all the way down.

Their "matriarchy" was made up out of convenience to justify selling their women into prostitution specifically to boost their numbers. When put to the test, this matriarchy factors into absolutely nothing.
Knight_Of_Saint_John on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Didn't they once had a female prime minister in like the 70's or something?
devotech2 on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
I don't know, but I don't really care. Kikes belong to the one race where the women and the men both act in exactly the same manner. For your interest as a goy, a female jew and a male jew are the exact same thing with no meaningful difference
devotech2 on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
There weren't any asiatics or niggers in their area at the time. Only Semitic groups, who made up the majority of the people in the region. And the Semitic people of those times weren't the same as they are today, they were white, of the same stock as the sumerians and the EEF. They just became dominant and spread their language family across the levant and later the Arab peninsula. The EEF (and related) didn't have a unified language group until the semites and yamnaya made the middle east and europe have them. Basque and Berber (yes, the berbers are direct descendants of the actual EEF, not just a related populace) are probably the only non-indo European and non-semitic EEF languages left in existence. Coptic if you include people closely related to them
Toast message