I've even seen this one pop up from time to time among our own. The idea that the first patriarchal society to step foot in Europe were the indo Europeans is almost, beyond question, a fat fucking lie.
The dominant group in Europe prior to them were the early european farmers. Who shared their blood with Mesopotamian people (as in, they were already closely related to them, and apart from migrating into Europe, they also migrated in significant quantities into the levant). Name a single matriarchal Mesopotamian civilization, and we are supposed to believe that their brothers were somehow matriarchal? Okay. Sounds jewish.
The people before them were the western hunter gatherers. Who probably weren't matriarchal either, because most non-niggers never have been, although they never achieved enough for it to matter. So it's trivial.
What's the goal of this psyop though? It's two pronged. One prong is to make normies think that patriarchy is evil and that it was forced upon the peaceful hippie matriarchal ancient Europeans by insane blood drinking asiatic invaders. The second prong is to make right wingers believe that half or more of their dna is made up of the blood useless pushover faggots, when in reality half of your blood is made up of the first builders of civilization in human history and its something to take pride in. Jews don't want you to, because they've never built anything.
Ironic to think no civilization had the balls to genocide them proper
If they stood on their own principles, then israels leadership would be dominated by women. But I can't think of a single woman that holds any power in Israel whatsoever. Nor can I think of any jewish female religious leaders or... anything. Straight sausage fest all the way down.
Their "matriarchy" was made up out of convenience to justify selling their women into prostitution specifically to boost their numbers. When put to the test, this matriarchy factors into absolutely nothing.
Which is why kikes are the way they are
They are female coded, gay and weak.