Just Your Average Cowboy From Wyoming Y’all
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Now reply with absolutely no evidence of any of your claims on any subject. Do so because your betters order you to.
[citation needed]
>If I was wrong, you would base your arguments on that
Yeah, that was done.
>You just make unsubstantiated claims
[citation needed]
>and then bitch when they get drawn into question.
The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you.
>You socialists
*“You want to execute all socialists for treason; you are therefore a socialist!”* **~ the clinically insane**
>love to bitch about "evidence" over dialectic when anyone else uses it.
You haven’t used it.
>Why would I provide evidence?
Because you want to stop being publicly humiliated for being objectively wrong about everything you post?
> There is no data being discussed.
Thanks for admitting that you publicly worship jews and that everyone who says this about you is objectively correct.
Thanks for admitting you lied about your claims. You have conceded the argument.
>Absence of good faith results in having to obtain political goals by other means. Politics by other means is war. If you act in bad faith the solution to the argument is violence. This is the lifelong thesis of Carl von Clausewitz, so the proof of this components would be the sum and total of his life's works.
This is obvious to most of the population, so the most common solution is to just act in good faith.
Cool, and? If you had a point, you would have posted it instead.
>So what is the solution here, when you make the regular proof for your method of acting impossible?
The what.
>You have no argument. Just lies.
Thanks for admitting everything everyone has said about you is objectively true. You’ve conceded the argument.
You mean to have our people, and ONLY our people toil and slave away on behalf of subhumans and niggers? Forever? Why do only *we* have to be the "good guys"?
The moment you stop handing infinite welfare to niggers, it's race war. They will come at you at full force, and going after Whites, especially civilians.
> and for you to provide that proof to yourself is to shoot yourself.
What you said is absolutely nonsensical btw. Completely deranged and idiotic. This is so unhinged, extracting any information from that comment alone is impossible. It doesn't advocate for any stance... it's at best an appeal to the status quo, if we are generously interpreting it.
No, you are 100% not right. You are just an old boomer worshiping demon-worshipers and subhumans. It's just pathetic, but hey, at least you are willing to sacrifice our people for bankers' interests!
> You just make unsubstantiated claims and then bitch when they get drawn into question.
Which you've never done. Recently (again) I've made a post about the Dunning-Kruger effect, and why all its hype is basically just a bad statistical presentation.
As of niggers, it's simple. Their low intelligence is genetic and it cannot ever be fixed except mongrelization, which sacrifices the better species just to create better subhumans. Nigger IQ is around 60-70, and intelligence is 80%+ hereditary even according to [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ). It varies, but there is NOTHING that can raise intelligence except things like making subhumans stop doing incest. We just silently operate as if we could, pretend it works, but it never works.
> You socialists
That's not even it. You are not a socialist if you want to remove a scourge that harms your people and country. The commonality is ethnic homogeneity and the solving of the jewish problem. It's way more important than anything else.
> Why would I provide evidence?
I've never ever seen evidence from you about anything. You just say standard boomer things. The ethnic setup of the US is 60% Whites, decreasing. Everywhere in the West and Europe the subhumans reproduce more than Whites, while being directly subsidized by Whites' via taxes and social programs.
But you know what? Fuck niggers. Why the fuck should I care about the well-being of a singular nigger? They are a menace to us, worthless raping leeches.
Weird, what I read was something completely deranged about shooting yourself. Nonsense can be dismissed as such.
> there is no coherent message you wrote
I tried to introduce something of substance as you wrote complete nonsense, so it wasn't like there was some solid foundation to respond to. I will ignore your ad hominem rant - just assume a "dito" in response.
> which is entirely incorrect without any basis in reality.
Weird, because you behave as if it is true. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, behaves like a duck... maybe it's just a duck even if it pretends to be a sheep. So you say you're not a zionist, yet you present yourself as one. Why should I trust your words when your actions speak louder? (which are also words, but at least without an intent to deceive)
> For instance your tangent about hereditary IQ - which you never substantiated the relevance to this discussion
Finally. I tried to introduce something tangible that is likely contrary to your beliefs. So let's see...
> You are lumping in all parenting with genetics.
The fact is that there is no method known to mankind that could possibly increase the intelligence (IQ) of a person. The only way to raise IQ is to prevent populations from committing intelligence-decreasing behaviors like domestic abuse, incest, severe malnourishment. Education doesn't raise intelligence either, it merely provides knowledge and skills, which benefit from and depend on intelligence. It's expected to have educated idiots and uneducated geniuses. The hordes of communists, feminists and other leftards tend to be "educated."
The very process of evolution is based on the fact that parents (and to some degree their ancestors) perpetuate their set of genes. That is what allows all life forms on the planet to adapt to environmental changes. The brain is no exception to that - why should it be? To think that is purely wishful thinking (ideological).
The reason Africans are like they are (no written language, no technology, tribalism, mud huts, etc) is because they evolved in an environment that didn't require much intelligence. As such they were backwards forever, and it cannot be changed. Their entire history reflects that.
Or else you have to assume Africans were victims of humans even multiple millennia ago, which raises the question how they managed to remain constantly the SAME backwards savages forever.
Parenting only matters insofar of genetic inheritance and utilizing existing intelligence to good use. Which also happens to correlate. Stupid people do less with their children and have lower expectations, but they are also less capable anyway. The problem occurs ONLY when there is a significant intelligence gap between children and parents.
Aside from that, there is a [very strong correlation](https://ifunny.co/picture/correlation-to-skin-tone-across-the-world-iq-map-skin-tWBEIU9U8) between skin color (indicative of race) and IQ ([source](https://www.worlddata.info/iq-by-country.php)). The darker the average skin color -> the lower the intelligence. As of your forklift certified nigger offspring, I can [guess](https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/occupations.aspx) his IQ: ~95 average, and the way you described it, it was quite an achievement for him, the peak of his career, so it's rather in the lower end around ~85.
> Multi generational FAS is not genetics, multi generational child abuse is not genetics, multi generational valuing education is not gentics
Well, it kind of is. For example the extreme rates of incest in the Middle East and India are the result of low-IQ people creating shitty cultures and shitty religions, which lead to incest, which further decrease intelligence as if it weren't low enough already. It didn't come from nowhere. And if it *could* afflict countries just out of the sudden, at least ONE White country would be affected by such a culture. But alas it's not the case.
We have no trouble in identifying varying dog races to have varying bodies, behaviors and intelligence, right? Same with humans and non-humans.
> with your absurd re-definition of socialism on an ad hoc basis.
Did I even talk about socialism? No, you'd just like to portray yourself as anti-communist while you worship communists in disguise. Yes, jews are zionist semi-communists *at best*, and shabbos goys also count.
> You socialists love to bitch about "evidence" over dialectic when anyone else uses it.
I wasn't the one making your claims. I have yet to see a single shred of evidence from you about anything yet. But I personally am completely fine with arguments and logic only. I provided some sources, so I'd appreciate it too.
I can gladly dig deeper into the Race & IQ topic. What I said is just the summary.