10 months ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
>Take a handgun, point it at your temple, and pull the trigger. That will get you the proof you need.
Thanks for admitting you lied about your claims. You have conceded the argument.
>Absence of good faith results in having to obtain political goals by other means. Politics by other means is war. If you act in bad faith the solution to the argument is violence. This is the lifelong thesis of Carl von Clausewitz, so the proof of this components would be the sum and total of his life's works.
This is obvious to most of the population, so the most common solution is to just act in good faith.
Cool, and? If you had a point, you would have posted it instead.
>So what is the solution here, when you make the regular proof for your method of acting impossible?
The what.
>You have no argument. Just lies.
Thanks for admitting everything everyone has said about you is objectively true. You’ve conceded the argument.
10 months ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> My point is that you need to take a handgun, point it at your temple, and pull the trigger. That will get you the proof you need.
So you copy-pasted your comment with this nigger-level IQ claim.
How about you take a handgun, point it at your temple, and pull the trigger? Whatever it will prove, it would prove the opposite. And hey, it's -1 faggot zionist boomer whose bloodline is long soiled by niggers, so nothing of value would be lost!
10 months ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> so the most common solution is to just act in good faith
You mean to have our people, and ONLY our people toil and slave away on behalf of subhumans and niggers? Forever? Why do only *we* have to be the "good guys"?
The moment you stop handing infinite welfare to niggers, it's race war. They will come at you at full force, and going after Whites, especially civilians.
> and for you to provide that proof to yourself is to shoot yourself.
What you said is absolutely nonsensical btw. Completely deranged and idiotic. This is so unhinged, extracting any information from that comment alone is impossible. It doesn't advocate for any stance... it's at best an appeal to the status quo, if we are generously interpreting it.
10 months ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> Acting in good faith means just not lying to perpetually obstruct diplomatic breakdown of your ideology
Alright. I want ethnic homogeneity of only Whites with nobody yearning for niggers to get imported (ideologically). Simple, isn't it?
> If you act in bad faith the solution to the argument is violence.
A violent solution is inevitable, given that decades and centuries have been dedicated to make peaceful solutions impossible.
> Carl von Clausewitz
He didn't live in an era where ethnic intermixing was ever a concern, or could even be imagined. I do not advocate for war with other nations anyway, that's what he certainly meant. Or over political disputes of minor relevance. I am talking about extinction level situations.
> Sure. Why would I fear that?
Because there are plenty of people who don't want to "risk" it out of a sense of "being nice." The very threat of race wars averts people from ever developing the intent to stop being exploited, and the communist ideology further forces/normalizes the support for degeneracy and subhumans in our own countries in unbound amounts.
You don't have to fear it because there is no political force in our countries that seeks to do anything that could lead to a race war (end of our exploitation).
> it is just that you are afraid of my ideology
It's not an ideology. It's just boring nonsense.
> You are forcing political breakdown.
And you are siding with the status quo, which is utterly terrible. So you want us to continue to be exploited on behalf of non-Whites, right?
Well, you are not working, right? So you don't have to pay for your actions anyway. But your offspring do. And one of your children has tainted its bloodline with a nigger. Quite a toll on your dignity.
[citation needed]
>If I was wrong, you would base your arguments on that
Yeah, that was done.
>You just make unsubstantiated claims
[citation needed]
>and then bitch when they get drawn into question.
The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you.
>You socialists
*“You want to execute all socialists for treason; you are therefore a socialist!”* **~ the clinically insane**
>love to bitch about "evidence" over dialectic when anyone else uses it.
You haven’t used it.
>Why would I provide evidence?
Because you want to stop being publicly humiliated for being objectively wrong about everything you post?
> There is no data being discussed.
Thanks for admitting that you publicly worship jews and that everyone who says this about you is objectively correct.
Thanks for admitting you lied about your claims. You have conceded the argument.
>Absence of good faith results in having to obtain political goals by other means. Politics by other means is war. If you act in bad faith the solution to the argument is violence. This is the lifelong thesis of Carl von Clausewitz, so the proof of this components would be the sum and total of his life's works.
This is obvious to most of the population, so the most common solution is to just act in good faith.
Cool, and? If you had a point, you would have posted it instead.
>So what is the solution here, when you make the regular proof for your method of acting impossible?
The what.
>You have no argument. Just lies.
Thanks for admitting everything everyone has said about you is objectively true. You’ve conceded the argument.
Sub-90 IQ confirmed.
> My point is
Thank you for admitting that you are incapable of proving anything you have said on any topic.
>[copypasta of non sequitur]
Didn’t work the first time; why would it work now?
So you copy-pasted your comment with this nigger-level IQ claim.
How about you take a handgun, point it at your temple, and pull the trigger? Whatever it will prove, it would prove the opposite. And hey, it's -1 faggot zionist boomer whose bloodline is long soiled by niggers, so nothing of value would be lost!
You mean to have our people, and ONLY our people toil and slave away on behalf of subhumans and niggers? Forever? Why do only *we* have to be the "good guys"?
The moment you stop handing infinite welfare to niggers, it's race war. They will come at you at full force, and going after Whites, especially civilians.
> and for you to provide that proof to yourself is to shoot yourself.
What you said is absolutely nonsensical btw. Completely deranged and idiotic. This is so unhinged, extracting any information from that comment alone is impossible. It doesn't advocate for any stance... it's at best an appeal to the status quo, if we are generously interpreting it.
Alright. I want ethnic homogeneity of only Whites with nobody yearning for niggers to get imported (ideologically). Simple, isn't it?
> If you act in bad faith the solution to the argument is violence.
A violent solution is inevitable, given that decades and centuries have been dedicated to make peaceful solutions impossible.
> Carl von Clausewitz
He didn't live in an era where ethnic intermixing was ever a concern, or could even be imagined. I do not advocate for war with other nations anyway, that's what he certainly meant. Or over political disputes of minor relevance. I am talking about extinction level situations.
> Sure. Why would I fear that?
Because there are plenty of people who don't want to "risk" it out of a sense of "being nice." The very threat of race wars averts people from ever developing the intent to stop being exploited, and the communist ideology further forces/normalizes the support for degeneracy and subhumans in our own countries in unbound amounts.
You don't have to fear it because there is no political force in our countries that seeks to do anything that could lead to a race war (end of our exploitation).
> it is just that you are afraid of my ideology
It's not an ideology. It's just boring nonsense.
> You are forcing political breakdown.
And you are siding with the status quo, which is utterly terrible. So you want us to continue to be exploited on behalf of non-Whites, right?
Well, you are not working, right? So you don't have to pay for your actions anyway. But your offspring do. And one of your children has tainted its bloodline with a nigger. Quite a toll on your dignity.