This is hieroglyphics to normies, a compete foreign alien language they can never understand
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
23 comments:
10
1 year ago
10 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+10Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Yeah, I am not really satisfied with the terms.
Niggers -------------------------------------------------- Whites - Orientals
The differences are minimal between Whites and Orientals, but we are talking about a gap from niggers to the rest that constitutes a different species.
Niggers -------------------------------------------------- Whites - Orientals
The differences are minimal between Whites and Orientals, but we are talking about a gap from niggers to the rest that constitutes a different species.
> The differences are minimal between Whites and Oriental
Oh really? The differences are minimal you say?
So let's see, what did "Oriental" ever invented?
Mmmmmm.......
Oh I know: sudoku! No wait, that was a White man.
White people have invented virtually everything that exists today. Bug people have invented *nothing*. Only because they can do math that doesn't make them similar to Whites.
Whites have creativity and abstract thinking, which all the subhumans lack.
Asians are subhumans.
Oh really? The differences are minimal you say?
So let's see, what did "Oriental" ever invented?
Mmmmmm.......
Oh I know: sudoku! No wait, that was a White man.
White people have invented virtually everything that exists today. Bug people have invented *nothing*. Only because they can do math that doesn't make them similar to Whites.
Whites have creativity and abstract thinking, which all the subhumans lack.
Asians are subhumans.
The differences between Whites and niggers are extreme compared to the differences between Whites and Orientals. That was my point.
This is like asking which type of cat is the most aggressive, and then coming up with:
- Lower: Persian
- Intermediate: American Shorthair
- Higher: Pitbull frequently abused by its nigger holder
This is like asking which type of cat is the most aggressive, and then coming up with:
- Lower: Persian
- Intermediate: American Shorthair
- Higher: Pitbull frequently abused by its nigger holder
I am rejecting your point.
Neither niggers nor Orientals are able to invent things, therefore they are both equally subhuman.
The ability to create is what distinguishes Aryans from subhumans, not the ability to do an IQ test. You can find millions of niggers with a decent IQ.
Neither niggers nor Orientals are able to invent things, therefore they are both equally subhuman.
The ability to create is what distinguishes Aryans from subhumans, not the ability to do an IQ test. You can find millions of niggers with a decent IQ.
> I am rejecting your point.
> Neither niggers nor Orientals are able to invent things, therefore they are both equally subhuman.
Then you missed the point twice. Because the point was about biology, math and wording. Average IQ 60-70 vs 102 vs 106 is not "lower", "intermediate" and "high." The proper terms are "abysmally low", "high", "highest." On the same scale sandniggers would be "moderate", pajeets "low", gypsies "very low."
We do not stand right between between niggers and Orientals, and to claim that is preposterous.
> The ability to create is what distinguishes Aryans from subhumans
That's a fine metric, but you just introduce a "don't think about it." If I'd want to not think, I'd be an idiot by choice filling the gaps with ideology. Niggers are not just subhuman, they are a different species. ***Niggers are not "human."***
You can consider Orientals subhuman, but genetically they are still closer to us than niggers *by far*. They are too subservient, lack creativity and the ability to deviate from established norms. It appears to be genetic.
> Neither niggers nor Orientals are able to invent things, therefore they are both equally subhuman.
Then you missed the point twice. Because the point was about biology, math and wording. Average IQ 60-70 vs 102 vs 106 is not "lower", "intermediate" and "high." The proper terms are "abysmally low", "high", "highest." On the same scale sandniggers would be "moderate", pajeets "low", gypsies "very low."
We do not stand right between between niggers and Orientals, and to claim that is preposterous.
> The ability to create is what distinguishes Aryans from subhumans
That's a fine metric, but you just introduce a "don't think about it." If I'd want to not think, I'd be an idiot by choice filling the gaps with ideology. Niggers are not just subhuman, they are a different species. ***Niggers are not "human."***
You can consider Orientals subhuman, but genetically they are still closer to us than niggers *by far*. They are too subservient, lack creativity and the ability to deviate from established norms. It appears to be genetic.
You are too focused on IQ. That's not what I was talking about, nor what I am interested in.
I'm interested in creativity and abstract thinking, not IQ. Both niggers and bug people have zero.
Also, IQ for niggers is still a normal distribution. There are millions of niggers on earth who have an IQ superior to the average White person. If IQ is so important for you, you'll end up believing that the solution is to just allow the best niggers to immigrate to our countries while excluding the stupid ones, and you'll become a civic nationalist.
I'm interested in creativity and abstract thinking, not IQ. Both niggers and bug people have zero.
Also, IQ for niggers is still a normal distribution. There are millions of niggers on earth who have an IQ superior to the average White person. If IQ is so important for you, you'll end up believing that the solution is to just allow the best niggers to immigrate to our countries while excluding the stupid ones, and you'll become a civic nationalist.
The only difference between Whites and Rice in intellect, potential-wise, is the seeming inability for Rice to innovate in a truly creative sense. They just can't invent new mechanical devices. They can invent *improvements*, *alternative methods*, etc., but original engineering creativity is rather in the toilet. A good example is the LED, and how a White man invented it, and then a Jap improved it (or rather used alternative methods and materials for manufacturing different color LEDs)
I can appreciate how the innovation of deep blue LEDs has affected my life. That doesn't mean im going to go farm rice but that also doesn't mean I want total rice death.
I can appreciate how the innovation of deep blue LEDs has affected my life. That doesn't mean im going to go farm rice but that also doesn't mean I want total rice death.
> the seeming inability for Rice to innovate in a truly creative sense
Yes, and it's the creativity that distinguishes humans (Aryans) from animals. Even an octopus or a dolphin or a dog has an IQ, and could potentially be taught to solve a given problem although it would be less capable than a bug person.
> They just can't invent new mechanical devices
And art. And music. And philosophy.
Yes, and it's the creativity that distinguishes humans (Aryans) from animals. Even an octopus or a dolphin or a dog has an IQ, and could potentially be taught to solve a given problem although it would be less capable than a bug person.
> They just can't invent new mechanical devices
And art. And music. And philosophy.
There was a well-done post here perhaps a year ago, from an asian setting the record straight on asian "high IQ scores." There is no truth to asians having statistically higher IQs than caucasians. The culture in asia (mostly China) is such that the status from having high test scores is much, much more beneficial than the consequences of being discovered as a cheat. Therefore, cheating is accepted and expected, and not punished. This can be seen in all areas of Chinese commerce and manufacturing as well.
The only difference scholastically in asian test scores can be attributed to unusual discipline amongst certain sectors of the population, but that is a reflection upon parenting and upbringing, and familial expectations, not IQ.
The only difference scholastically in asian test scores can be attributed to unusual discipline amongst certain sectors of the population, but that is a reflection upon parenting and upbringing, and familial expectations, not IQ.
Turns out that the vaunted Asian life expectancy is likely bogus too. The numbers are boosted from insurance/pension fraud and bad record keeping.
https://fortune.com/europe/2024/12/14/are-blue-zones-myth-extreme-aging-pension-fraud-century-old-lies/
>Just one of many examples is Sogen Kato, who was thought to be Japan’s oldest living person until his mummified remains were discovered in 2010.
>It turned out he had been dead since 1978. His family was arrested for collecting three decades of pensions payments.
>The government then launched a review which found that 82 percent of Japan’s centenarians — 230,000 people — were missing or dead.
https://fortune.com/europe/2024/12/14/are-blue-zones-myth-extreme-aging-pension-fraud-century-old-lies/
>Just one of many examples is Sogen Kato, who was thought to be Japan’s oldest living person until his mummified remains were discovered in 2010.
>It turned out he had been dead since 1978. His family was arrested for collecting three decades of pensions payments.
>The government then launched a review which found that 82 percent of Japan’s centenarians — 230,000 people — were missing or dead.
>On 22 June 2020, the Department of Psychology at the University of Western Ontario issued a statement regarding their former faculty member, which read in part:[1]
>Despite its deeply flawed assumptions and methodologies, Rushton's work and other so-called "race science" (currently under the pseudonym of "race realism") continues to be misused by white supremacists and promoted by eugenic organizations. Thus, Rushton's legacy shows that the impact of flawed science lingers on, even after qualified scholars have condemned its scientific integrity. Academic freedom and freedom of expression are critical to free scientific inquiry. However, the notion of academic freedom is disrespected and abused when it is used to promote the dissemination of racist and discriminatory concepts. Scientists have an obligation to society to speak loudly and actively in opposition of such abuse.
The state of "science" in the current year
>Despite its deeply flawed assumptions and methodologies, Rushton's work and other so-called "race science" (currently under the pseudonym of "race realism") continues to be misused by white supremacists and promoted by eugenic organizations. Thus, Rushton's legacy shows that the impact of flawed science lingers on, even after qualified scholars have condemned its scientific integrity. Academic freedom and freedom of expression are critical to free scientific inquiry. However, the notion of academic freedom is disrespected and abused when it is used to promote the dissemination of racist and discriminatory concepts. Scientists have an obligation to society to speak loudly and actively in opposition of such abuse.
The state of "science" in the current year
85 IQ is way too high for niggers, the DSM-II used to have 80 IQ at retard level them lowered it to 70 since so many niggers were deemed retarded. Don’t forget that many get off with murder because they are too stupid to know better - which is when the rope is needed.
Toast message