New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
27
posted 1 year ago by genesisSOC on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +27Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yeah, I am not really satisfied with the terms.

Niggers -------------------------------------------------- Whites - Orientals

The differences are minimal between Whites and Orientals, but we are talking about a gap from niggers to the rest that constitutes a different species.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
> The differences are minimal between Whites and Oriental

Oh really? The differences are minimal you say?

So let's see, what did "Oriental" ever invented?

Mmmmmm.......

Oh I know: sudoku! No wait, that was a White man.

White people have invented virtually everything that exists today. Bug people have invented *nothing*. Only because they can do math that doesn't make them similar to Whites.

Whites have creativity and abstract thinking, which all the subhumans lack.

Asians are subhumans.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The differences between Whites and niggers are extreme compared to the differences between Whites and Orientals. That was my point.

This is like asking which type of cat is the most aggressive, and then coming up with:

- Lower: Persian
- Intermediate: American Shorthair
- Higher: Pitbull frequently abused by its nigger holder
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
 I am rejecting your point.
Neither niggers nor Orientals are able to invent things, therefore they are both equally subhuman.

The ability to create is what distinguishes Aryans from subhumans, not the ability to do an IQ test. You can find millions of niggers with a decent IQ.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> I am rejecting your point.

> Neither niggers nor Orientals are able to invent things, therefore they are both equally subhuman.

Then you missed the point twice. Because the point was about biology, math and wording. Average IQ 60-70 vs 102 vs 106 is not "lower", "intermediate" and "high." The proper terms are "abysmally low", "high", "highest." On the same scale sandniggers would be "moderate", pajeets "low", gypsies "very low."

We do not stand right between between niggers and Orientals, and to claim that is preposterous.

> The ability to create is what distinguishes Aryans from subhumans

That's a fine metric, but you just introduce a "don't think about it." If I'd want to not think, I'd be an idiot by choice filling the gaps with ideology. Niggers are not just subhuman, they are a different species. ***Niggers are not "human."***

You can consider Orientals subhuman, but genetically they are still closer to us than niggers *by far*. They are too subservient, lack creativity and the ability to deviate from established norms. It appears to be genetic.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You are too focused on IQ. That's not what I was talking about, nor what I am interested in.

I'm interested in creativity and abstract thinking, not IQ. Both niggers and bug people have zero.

Also, IQ for niggers is still a normal distribution. There are millions of niggers on earth who have an IQ superior to the average White person. If IQ is so important for you, you'll end up believing that the solution is to just allow the best niggers to immigrate to our countries while excluding the stupid ones, and you'll become a civic nationalist.
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The only difference between Whites and Rice in intellect, potential-wise, is the seeming inability for Rice to innovate in a truly creative sense. They just can't invent new mechanical devices. They can invent *improvements*, *alternative methods*, etc., but original engineering creativity is rather in the toilet. A good example is the LED, and how a White man invented it, and then a Jap improved it (or rather used alternative methods and materials for manufacturing different color LEDs)

I can appreciate how the innovation of deep blue LEDs has affected my life. That doesn't mean im going to go farm rice but that also doesn't mean I want total rice death.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> the seeming inability for Rice to innovate in a truly creative sense

Yes, and it's the creativity that distinguishes humans (Aryans) from animals. Even an octopus or a dolphin or a dog has an IQ, and could potentially be taught to solve a given problem although it would be less capable than a bug person.

> They just can't invent new mechanical devices

And art. And music. And philosophy.
Toast message