New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
If self-proclaimed white nationalists were actually serious about our beliefs, we would have long ago been picking up and running with the collective hatred and backlash toward trannies to push the Overton Window back where it belongs. Specifically,

# Trannyism didn’t begin with the “legal” and social “acceptance” of faggotry. It began with female crossdressing.

In the face of the refusal to accept trannies (predominantly presented as men dressing as women–and mutilating themselves, but that’s not even relevant here), **it needs to be made socially unacceptable again for women to dress** ***and behave*** **as men.**

“It’s a shame you hate yourself that much; you’re so beautiful otherwise.” “Why are you pretending to be something you’re not? Are you afraid to be who you are?” “Do you really think you’re a man? No? Then why act like one?”

But no, see, we don’t do things like that. It’s illegal. And whites wouldn’t ever break the law.
You must log in or sign up to comment
10 comments:
12
ForgottenMemes on scored.co
1 year ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror ) 3 children
You must to too young to remember the 80s and 90s. jews did an amazing job of portraying people who had tantrums about a woman wearing jeans, recreational pot smokers or closeted homos as being totally unreasonable and obnoxious. And 90% of normies agreed.

By wasting themselves on these losing battles all the moral authority of conservatives was stripped away and they were ineffective at fighting real threats.

All of these issues: drugs, faggotry, transvestites, feminism, etc are downstream from jewish control of the media and the imposition of jewish values on our society. Take that away and all the degeneracy will evaporate.

The effective way to fight this fight is a two pronged approach. You need to show that white values, discipline, honesty, modesty, etc are the true path to happiness. Simultaneously exposing the fact that the degeneracy is being pushed by hostile foreigners. People respond positively to those messages, they respond negatively to someone being preachy about issues they view as trivial.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
>jews did an amazing job of portraying people who had tantrums about a woman wearing jeans, recreational pot smokers or closeted homos as being totally unreasonable and obnoxious. And 90% of normies agreed.

I do remember (though I remember it ‘ending’ a bit before that, even). I simply don’t give a shit. They did an “amazing job” of portraying niggers and spics and slants and dune coons as “able to behave exactly like whites and fit in with white society,” too. Look how *that* collapsed. Why not seize the moment.

>losing battles

Clothing is literally the foundation of human civilization.

>Take that away

You will never do that, though. Ever. At any time. Under any circumstance. At least have the fucking balls to fight back about *something.*

>values, discipline… modesty

Oh, things like “not cross-dressing,” then, huh? Wish I’d thought of that.

>they respond negatively to someone being preachy about issues

They respond negatively to *social shaming only*. They don’t give a fuck about abstractions of sapient thought. *They’re* not sapient.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
> They did an “amazing job” of portraying niggers and spics and slants and dune coons as “able to behave exactly like whites and fit in with white society,”

The Watts riots -- in the 80s? I remember that. The conversation at the dinner table went something like this.

Kids: "Dad, why can't we just kill all the looters?"

Mom: "That's no good. The blacks would all rise up and we'd have a race war."

Kids: "So what? We'd just shoot them all. If they'd riot over looters getting shot, they deserve to get shot."

Dad: "The punishment for looting is death. When I was in the Air Force, we were taught how to handle riots and looting. You can't just charge in."

Mom: "Don't go on about that now."

Dad: "It's probably a communist or two behind it all, just like MLK Jr. The commies killed JFK."

Kids: "Is it true the FBI killed MLK? That's pretty cool. If I join the FBI, can I kill commies too?"

Mom: "We're supposed to treat everyone equally."

Kids: "So if a white community starting looting and rioting, we'd be justified in killing all of them, but a black community gets a free pass? It's racist NOT to kill them all."
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
ForgottenMemes on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
jeets and akbars wouldn't be a problem if we didn't have jewish tyranny and did have the political will to get rid of them. The political will comes from being proud and healthy. Degenerates who don't care about their own lives and don't even know who their neighbors are aren't going to care if we deport nons or not. People with large families, lots of IRL friends who care about the cleanliness and health of their city are going to be staunchly anti-immigration. This is why jews spread degeneracy where ever they go. It kills the desire to defend yourself against invasion. The tatted up stoners who say "peace, love and pass the bong" are a big part of why we have an immigration problem in the first place.

So you're right, the nons are an existential threat, but these things are all connected and it's one big fight not several small ones.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
How do we fight foreign invaders when our women are opening the Gates of Toledo?

They are the future of the race; if we don't sort them out, nothing else matters.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> all the moral authority of conservatives

It wasn't the conservatives. It was Tipper Gore-types, the D's who wanted the conservative vote to stay in office. (D's have been very unpopular for a very long time in the US.)

Real conservatives already had that battle in the 50s and 60s, and realized it would be a losing fight. You can't tell your daughter to wear a dress if you're not home teaching her about the birds and bees before she finds out from the local beatnik commie. We were tricked into believing public education and the government would actually do their job and left our homes to try and make a small fortune only to realize we lost everything in the process. We're not falling for that again.

In the 80s, real conservatives were being fathers and mothers, building homes and planting gardens while hoping Reagan would actually fight the commies here in the US in the 80s. Under our breath we were hoping things would kick off with the USSR so we could go kill some commies, or at least have an excuse to nuke them into oblivion. "MAD" didn't scare us. We knew how to build society and we'd rebuild it on the ashes of the liberals. We had bomb shelters and cans of food (and can openers) and plenty of ammo stored away. If things kicked off, we weren't going to be asking Uncle Sam for help or permission.

It wouldn't be until the late 90s and 2000s that pretty much all the real conservatives realized there was no political solution. We vote for Trump because he's the closest thing to the "off" switch. The fact he did anything at all in our favor is a major win, because we never expected to see any wins in politics ever.

Meanwhile, us Gen-X who were raised by stay-at-home moms who baked bread and fought like dragons for us aren't wondering why gay marriage was "legalized". We know what happened. We know "they" took something from us, and we want it back. Some of us took a while to understand who "they" were the entire time. But we got it now.

You guys think you see "Real" conservatives on TV or the news. You don't. Trump is on the far left. He doesn't represent us, and he never will. The most conservative voices to us are liberals and practically communist. Rush Limbaugh was a funny liberal to us. He was barely conservative at all. The modern bunch will get no sympathy or help from us when things kick off. The Charlie Kirk types are just out there trying to make a buck, we know it and he probably knows it too. He's probably scared to death of us because he knows we won't help him.

Real conservatives would be hanging commies and dems and repubs left and right for treason, executing adulterers and rapists and doing a lot more than that. We would be shooting people at the border, man, woman and child, and laughing about it. We would cut off ALL social benefits for EVERYONE, especially the niggers, and when they riot, we would mow them down and ask government to reimburse us for the ammo. We would be paying people to go house-to-house asking whether they are here illegally and allowing them to be shot in the town square. Most of what we stand for isn't allowed on political forums because it is considered "violent". Watch an old western, you'll see our moral code in action. We are the guys that kicked ass in WWII and thought it was pretty fun. Hitler was God's olive branch, we are not going to be so kind.

There isn't going to be a resurgence of conservatism in America until the militia is mustered and we are putting pretty much everyone and their uncle on trial for treason, at the local level.
WhatWouldMountainDew on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
You are fundamentally correct about many people not correctly identifying the true origin of a lot of things they consider "bad".

I don't know when women trannyism really took off. I'm guessing it was during WWII when women started to do men's jobs left behind by those who were enlisted.

I think another watershed was title IX which was college DEI for women (which BTW is probably a contributing factor to the "what happened in 1971?" posts I've seen more of lately).
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
>predominantly presented as men dressing as women–and mutilating themselves, but that’s not even relevant here

It's interesting that this is what everyone thinks, when the reality is that 3/4 or more of trannies are women; males are a very small percentage that get blown up, particularily by Conservatives. Muh womans's changerooms, but never mind we've let women expose themselves in the workplace for 40 years.

It goes right back to "equality" and "women's rights" which are invariably men's rights. The arguments were never about how these rights would help women, but that it wasn't "fair" that men got rights that women didn't, like a child complaining that they never get to drive the car.

Women and men are different. Women are literally sex objects; they have intrinsic value as women that men don't have. They can completely fulfil their obligation to society just by having 2+ kids; they don't need to do *anything* beyond that so they don't need rights like men have. Men need to actually do things that serve society, according to their ability. They need to provide physical protection so they need the right to bear arms. They need to provide leadership, so they need the right to speak. They need to collaborate with other men and so they need the right to vote, associate freely etc. Every right has a corresponding responsibility that women *don't have*.

I'm actually in favour of women's rights, in the domain of child rearing. They need to use their bodies to bear children so they should have enhanced rights to be free from government interference and corporate poisons. They should have the right to raise their children as they see fit (up to, say the age of 12); no "children's services" or mandatory schooling, even let them trans their kids, it just eliminates stupid blood from the nation.
5BillionDeadniGGers on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
the divide between male and female is counterproductive.

focus on being human.

there dont need to be separate clothing styles for men and women. (apart from booby-tamers and dick-accomodators)

all that shit is just "divide and conquer" your soul is 16 billion years old and doesnt have a gender.
Toast message