New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
If self-proclaimed white nationalists were actually serious about our beliefs, we would have long ago been picking up and running with the collective hatred and backlash toward trannies to push the Overton Window back where it belongs. Specifically,

# Trannyism didn’t begin with the “legal” and social “acceptance” of faggotry. It began with female crossdressing.

In the face of the refusal to accept trannies (predominantly presented as men dressing as women–and mutilating themselves, but that’s not even relevant here), **it needs to be made socially unacceptable again for women to dress** ***and behave*** **as men.**

“It’s a shame you hate yourself that much; you’re so beautiful otherwise.” “Why are you pretending to be something you’re not? Are you afraid to be who you are?” “Do you really think you’re a man? No? Then why act like one?”

But no, see, we don’t do things like that. It’s illegal. And whites wouldn’t ever break the law.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
WhatWouldMountainDew on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
You are fundamentally correct about many people not correctly identifying the true origin of a lot of things they consider "bad".

I don't know when women trannyism really took off. I'm guessing it was during WWII when women started to do men's jobs left behind by those who were enlisted.

I think another watershed was title IX which was college DEI for women (which BTW is probably a contributing factor to the "what happened in 1971?" posts I've seen more of lately).
Toast message