If self-proclaimed white nationalists were actually serious about our beliefs, we would have long ago been picking up and running with the collective hatred and backlash toward trannies to push the Overton Window back where it belongs. Specifically,
# Trannyism didn’t begin with the “legal” and social “acceptance” of faggotry. It began with female crossdressing.
In the face of the refusal to accept trannies (predominantly presented as men dressing as women–and mutilating themselves, but that’s not even relevant here), **it needs to be made socially unacceptable again for women to dress** ***and behave*** **as men.**
“It’s a shame you hate yourself that much; you’re so beautiful otherwise.” “Why are you pretending to be something you’re not? Are you afraid to be who you are?” “Do you really think you’re a man? No? Then why act like one?”
But no, see, we don’t do things like that. It’s illegal. And whites wouldn’t ever break the law.
The Watts riots -- in the 80s? I remember that. The conversation at the dinner table went something like this.
Kids: "Dad, why can't we just kill all the looters?"
Mom: "That's no good. The blacks would all rise up and we'd have a race war."
Kids: "So what? We'd just shoot them all. If they'd riot over looters getting shot, they deserve to get shot."
Dad: "The punishment for looting is death. When I was in the Air Force, we were taught how to handle riots and looting. You can't just charge in."
Mom: "Don't go on about that now."
Dad: "It's probably a communist or two behind it all, just like MLK Jr. The commies killed JFK."
Kids: "Is it true the FBI killed MLK? That's pretty cool. If I join the FBI, can I kill commies too?"
Mom: "We're supposed to treat everyone equally."
Kids: "So if a white community starting looting and rioting, we'd be justified in killing all of them, but a black community gets a free pass? It's racist NOT to kill them all."