1 year ago17 points(+0/-0/+17Score on mirror)5 children
This is an arbitrary thing with various interpretations. What is white? Do Finns count?(they are eastern uralic and not the same stock as celts). Do Spaniards(admixture of north african and muslim)? Do southern italians?(huge admixtures of jew and north african). What about mongols, han Chinese, Koreans, and japanese?(these are white caucasoid dna with isolation adaptations causing epicanthic folds and olive skin). Northern brahmin(40-75% ancient aryan blood depending on the purity of the family)? Greek? Scottish? Irish?
These things matter, to a point. More important is culture and tradition and complementary genetics. Your ancestors from the 1400s would probably consider you a mongrel. Mine would, and I am 100% British isles but a pict marrying an Irish lass? SACRILEGE!
Genetics MATTER but it's up to you to decide how much, and in what way.
The person matters most. The genetics provide the base range of their strengths and weaknesses, but experience and personal drive decide what someone does with it.
1 year ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)2 children
And that's why the duck test is better than the one drop test. If they look White and they act White, then most likely than not they're a bona-fide White.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
That depends on where you look. Andalusia has a large percentage of north african and Semitic blood because of the Muslim invasion. Castille not so much. There are white Argentinians and brown Spaniards its more about the family line than nationality
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
Andalusia, I’ll grant you, *seems* believable simply because it was the last segment of the Reconquista. However, [the genetic record doesn’t seem to support it.](https://i.postimg.cc/mLXxzzT4/PCA-Caucasoid.png) Spaniards of all stripes cluster quite far away from even Tuscans, which only some Murcian Spaniards approach. "North Africa” genes–even Moroccan–are well removed from them.
They are also very family oriented and community oriented which probably minimized the admixing more than in other places. But that's why I'm sayings it's about the personal genetics more than the "label".
Probably yes. They are white mexican(primarily Spanish blood, not indigenous). Culturally she didn't even speak Spanish as a child.
Then of course the woke virus and muh mexican pride got her so I don't think she's a good person and I don't know their specific heritage deeply just a cursory research but looking at the image and facial features I would say probably.
No, I'm saying what do we define as white for YOUR GENETIC PURPOSE.
Your ancient race matters. Your ancient traditions matter. Your personal environment and community and culture matter. A finn would call themselves white, so would a Greek, but they are very different.
The general understanding I'm trying to convey is that it depends on what we are applying the idea to.
For making babies? The most important is genetic compatibility and beneficial complementary genes. That doesn't need to be scot with scot, but the pool of compatibility gets more complex and you need to be discerning.
For friendship and community its a much broader idea and really doesn't have nearly as much to do with genetics as it does with culture. I have black friends Asian friends Mexican friends etc. I have a lot more white friends of course, but that's more about the persons cultural environment and family life than genes. Smart black people exist, they are just rare because of genes. I know them and love them but that doesn't mean I'm going to let my daughter date one. Different scenarios.
Yes. Jews is just the name they have adopted this iteration. They are an ancient enemy we have known by many names.
The Phoenician, hyksos, sea peoples, carthaginians, etc.
They were exiled from the black sea area by scythian tribes and fled south into the Levant. Tunisia, Sicily, southern Iberia, and the Levant. All were strongholds and colonies of theirs. Roman's fought carthaginians because they sacrificed their children to baal.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Middle eastern people have a specific look just like native americans or any other ethnic group that has been inbreeding for centuries. So they have developed a particular set of genetic features that has been carried through bloodlines across centuries. That's the reason we don't want to mix with these people, to keep out blood uncorrupted.
1 year ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
LOL WTF IS THAT!
Looks like an alien. Looks like one of my Koi fish jumped into a bucket of flour. Looks like a literal mannequin!
I agree with you 100% but I also stand by my point. As a way to quickly judge the "whiteness" of someone, their skin tone is the best determining factor so long as we can identify jews and their abominable creations.
Im just assuming that thing is a genetic experiment. Could be something else like albino, but someone who has the ability to identify a hew would also have the ability to know that this thing is *something* similar. Identifying the jew is the same as seeing through the "white paint".
In America, there is so much diversity among white people. So I see OP as being divisive, and my response is going to against the anti-white propaganda intended to keep us from unity by encouraging the disowning of "less pure" people along arbitrary, subjective terms. The "Itallians and Spaniards aren't really white" is a conversation that benefits ONLY the jews.
So in general, if OP wants to know if someone is "white" or not, skin tone and jewdar is all they should need.
That's an albino africoon. They're an endangered sub-species because normal Sub-Saharan Africans hunt them, based on a belief albino body parts have medical properties.
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
Are you 100% Anglo Saxon? 100% swede? Do you understand that your definition of white was created by a jew 130 years ago? I'm not even saying it's a wrong definition - I'm just asking you to DEFINE IT and pointing out that your great great great great great grandpa probably wouldn't agree.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
As far as I know I'm a lot of different Euro, and no, the definition of white was made when Adam and Eve were created. The "tree of life" in Scripture with the nons being of the" tree of knowledge of good and evil" - fallen angels and their children/creation (we don't know the details, we aren't told). Our grandparents' standards and this jew's definition are irrelevant.
Noah and his family were all white, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob who are Hebrews and Israelites are white, Esau is white, but he married Canaanites, so his descendants, partly the jews, are not white. The dispersed Israelites are Europeans and so we're white (see: 100 Proofs the Israelites were White).
Of course it's impossible to know if our lineage is 100% or not, only God does. Is this a clear enough answer?
80/20 rule in full effect. I live my life by it 80% of the time.😁
Seriously though, if they have more than 5% nigger in them, I’m hard passing. 20% nigger is TOO DAMN HIGH!!!
Puerto Ricans are a great example of this. There are some beautiful ones that have mostly European looks and traits now after a few gens, but some still have double digit nigger in them. I’m talking 10% and higher. I know an absolutely beautiful PR woman from her mother’s side who could also pass for white. You’d never know she had any nigger in her, and she absolutely can’t stand niggers. She makes fun of herself. Lmfao. We estimated from going back to her grand grandparents that she likely had 2-7% nigger in her. Lmfao. I always tell her she’s my niggers, and I only keep her around so I can tell people I’m not racist because I have a nigger friend. 😎