You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Discrediting the people who claim it's a fabrication doesn't prove the Protocols are real. And holy moly that wouldn't even be, on the best of days, "solid proof". You need the prove the validity of the Protocols. Believing *anything* on nothing more than face value, *especially* something that just "happens" to tell you exactly what you wish to be told, makes you a fool. That's how you get manipulated.
Everybody lies about everything, and has for all of history. Literally one of the first things children learn is how to lie. And I'm not going to believe that the people of the early 1900s, who thought the train was going to burst out of the movie screen and run them all over, weren't any less gullible. Everything is fake until proven otherwise, and that goes for a sketchy document that appeared out of nowhere, credited to nobody, with no history. Discrediting the 'debunkers' changes nothing for me.
And it doesn't for most people.
Part 1 alone is 7,770 words. There's 40 fucking parts. I opened up part 30 at random and it was 9,500 words. ***Nobody has read this shit, and I won't believe you if you claim you did.*** This fucker wrote a goddamn tome that would make Tolstoy blush, about a document that's like 12,000 words on its own.
*40 parts.* This is the work of a diseased mind. [You can present the entire history of the Roman Empire in a fraction of the time.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EOzr15h8S8&list=PLp5VE4P1YBhc05cDqiOazzTTu1WSh8MHg)
Like I said, if the author can't take themselves seriously, why should I? How long is the entire series? A *quarter million words?*
I've just started this series myself, and I'm at around the first protocol. The forgery claim is what a lot of people believe, and it's an absolute joke, same with the Ford apology. He didn't even write or read it before it was printed, and it admits nothing. You'd think the jews would have more solid claims against the protocols, but they don't.
Besides, who cares about its origin when it gets so many things right?
Wait a fucking minute, you told me this shit was 'solid proof', now you admit **YOU** haven't even read it?
So your passionate defense of the protocols *actually is just because it says mean things about jews, so you simply elect to believe it's true?*
Can you even play pretend long enough to try to describe to me what you personally would accept as "solid claims" **against** the legitimacy of the Protocols?
Literally the closest thing that's happened is that the agency that claimed to have found it, later said it was fake.
And we both know that 'agency admits something is fake' is shit you only believe if it's something you LIKE to hear.
You've talked a lot without saying or addressing anything. The first 3 or 4 cover the forgery court case, so if you can't at least listen/read up to there, we're done here. I will not condense it for you.
Everybody lies about everything, and has for all of history. Literally one of the first things children learn is how to lie. And I'm not going to believe that the people of the early 1900s, who thought the train was going to burst out of the movie screen and run them all over, weren't any less gullible. Everything is fake until proven otherwise, and that goes for a sketchy document that appeared out of nowhere, credited to nobody, with no history. Discrediting the 'debunkers' changes nothing for me.
And it doesn't for most people.
Part 1 alone is 7,770 words. There's 40 fucking parts. I opened up part 30 at random and it was 9,500 words. ***Nobody has read this shit, and I won't believe you if you claim you did.*** This fucker wrote a goddamn tome that would make Tolstoy blush, about a document that's like 12,000 words on its own.
*40 parts.* This is the work of a diseased mind. [You can present the entire history of the Roman Empire in a fraction of the time.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EOzr15h8S8&list=PLp5VE4P1YBhc05cDqiOazzTTu1WSh8MHg)
Like I said, if the author can't take themselves seriously, why should I? How long is the entire series? A *quarter million words?*
Besides, who cares about its origin when it gets so many things right?
Wait a fucking minute, you told me this shit was 'solid proof', now you admit **YOU** haven't even read it?
So your passionate defense of the protocols *actually is just because it says mean things about jews, so you simply elect to believe it's true?*
Can you even play pretend long enough to try to describe to me what you personally would accept as "solid claims" **against** the legitimacy of the Protocols?
Literally the closest thing that's happened is that the agency that claimed to have found it, later said it was fake.
And we both know that 'agency admits something is fake' is shit you only believe if it's something you LIKE to hear.