You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
>I've just started this series myself
Wait a fucking minute, you told me this shit was 'solid proof', now you admit **YOU** haven't even read it?
So your passionate defense of the protocols *actually is just because it says mean things about jews, so you simply elect to believe it's true?*
Can you even play pretend long enough to try to describe to me what you personally would accept as "solid claims" **against** the legitimacy of the Protocols?
Literally the closest thing that's happened is that the agency that claimed to have found it, later said it was fake.
And we both know that 'agency admits something is fake' is shit you only believe if it's something you LIKE to hear.
You've talked a lot without saying or addressing anything. The first 3 or 4 cover the forgery court case, so if you can't at least listen/read up to there, we're done here. I will not condense it for you.
I learned it's the mark of retardation to demand someone prove a negative when I was three months old. This is the ConPro version of "CHECKMATE ATHEISTS"
Wait a fucking minute, you told me this shit was 'solid proof', now you admit **YOU** haven't even read it?
So your passionate defense of the protocols *actually is just because it says mean things about jews, so you simply elect to believe it's true?*
Can you even play pretend long enough to try to describe to me what you personally would accept as "solid claims" **against** the legitimacy of the Protocols?
Literally the closest thing that's happened is that the agency that claimed to have found it, later said it was fake.
And we both know that 'agency admits something is fake' is shit you only believe if it's something you LIKE to hear.