New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
33
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +33Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>I've just started this series myself

Wait a fucking minute, you told me this shit was 'solid proof', now you admit **YOU** haven't even read it?

So your passionate defense of the protocols *actually is just because it says mean things about jews, so you simply elect to believe it's true?*

Can you even play pretend long enough to try to describe to me what you personally would accept as "solid claims" **against** the legitimacy of the Protocols?

Literally the closest thing that's happened is that the agency that claimed to have found it, later said it was fake.

And we both know that 'agency admits something is fake' is shit you only believe if it's something you LIKE to hear.
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You've talked a lot without saying or addressing anything. The first 3 or 4 cover the forgery court case, so if you can't at least listen/read up to there, we're done here. I will not condense it for you.
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>Discrediting the people who claim it's a fabrication doesn't prove the Protocols are real.
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> You'd think the jews would have more solid claims against the protocols, but they don't.
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I learned it's the mark of retardation to demand someone prove a negative when I was three months old. This is the ConPro version of "CHECKMATE ATHEISTS"
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
More typing, even less said. I'm done here.
Toast message