New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
33
Protocols of of the Elders of Zion were debunked by a Jew (files.catbox.moe)
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +33Score on mirror )
51 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
LOL this is the "ironclad proof" you need to prove the protocol forgery claims are a joke, and you're attacking the site based on how it looks.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yes I am. If they can't be bothered to appear to take themselves seriously, why should I?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You're responding to everyone in this post, trying to convince them the protocols are a forgery, yet when shown solid proof you don't even address it. Smells like jew
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Have you read literally the entire thing? Which part is the "solid proof"? Because part 1 is 10,000 words long of meandering claims of where people lived. That's just Part 1. There's like ten fucking parts.

"Solid proof" doesn't require an endless dissertation of pilpul.

And I'll be honest I actually doubt you have read all of it either. It is dry, it lists a hundred names, and all I got out of it is that "this one person skipped on a check once so they can't be trusted".

If you did, sum that shit up because I ain't reading this stream of consciousness that apparently I am expected to simply trust is true "because".
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
It's necessary background information on people involved in the forgery case. If you can't listen to something this thorough, you're always going to think the protocols are a forgery.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Discrediting the people who claim it's a fabrication doesn't prove the Protocols are real. And holy moly that wouldn't even be, on the best of days, "solid proof". You need the prove the validity of the Protocols. Believing *anything* on nothing more than face value, *especially* something that just "happens" to tell you exactly what you wish to be told, makes you a fool. That's how you get manipulated.

Everybody lies about everything, and has for all of history. Literally one of the first things children learn is how to lie. And I'm not going to believe that the people of the early 1900s, who thought the train was going to burst out of the movie screen and run them all over, weren't any less gullible. Everything is fake until proven otherwise, and that goes for a sketchy document that appeared out of nowhere, credited to nobody, with no history. Discrediting the 'debunkers' changes nothing for me.

And it doesn't for most people.

Part 1 alone is 7,770 words. There's 40 fucking parts. I opened up part 30 at random and it was 9,500 words. ***Nobody has read this shit, and I won't believe you if you claim you did.*** This fucker wrote a goddamn tome that would make Tolstoy blush, about a document that's like 12,000 words on its own.

*40 parts.* This is the work of a diseased mind. [You can present the entire history of the Roman Empire in a fraction of the time.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EOzr15h8S8&list=PLp5VE4P1YBhc05cDqiOazzTTu1WSh8MHg)

Like I said, if the author can't take themselves seriously, why should I? How long is the entire series? A *quarter million words?*
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Continue thread...
Toast message