You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-1
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago-1 points(+0/-1)1 child
Evolution has by far a greater reach than just humanity. It's a theory about *every* life form on the planet spanning billions of years. It's about the interactions of life forms and the environment that lead to gradual changes in species. It's about species and races, and an understanding *that* and *how* changes in environment and other species cause changes in species. The alternative is to believe in either pure randomness or that species never change.
It's not a simple topic either, and I am not sure the Scientific Community™ properly understands it, but there are factors like this in play:
- The reproduction rate (and thus life span, and rate of maturity) of a species determines the frequency it does genetic alterations. A higher rate allows for quicker genetic adaptation.
- Intelligence is the ability for life forms to adapt to their environments in runtime instead of a genetic basis. For example an animal can learn that fruit X is toxic, it doesn't need to develop an immunity over the course of thousands of years or more. It is only humans that intelligence became super powerful as it allowed technology to develop.
- There are multiple factors in play, which is why genetic adaptation takes long periods of time. For example you'd think that having +10% fur due to decreased temperature would be best, but things like strength and health matter more. Only when a lack of fur causes physical issues, it becomes relevant. So these things often work indirectly.
It is unquestionable that we were and are subject to evolution, but only because we are, our origins are not certain. But even if we evolved from apes, so what? At some point we were of microscopic size, barely having multiple cells, swimming through water all the time. We don't have to be the all-time peak of nobility and honor. There are literal people out there who are depraved losers and idiots barely stumbling through life. It's arrogance to believe that 1. we were always like this, and 2. we'll always be like this.
Btw niggers are a different species. Other races like pajeets are actually other races. But niggers are genetically different from ALL others to a point they can be classified as another species. Which is why I generally refer to niggers as a different species, not race. Niggers are literally not humans, just as apes are not humans.
> Other races like pajeets are actually other races. But niggers are genetically different from ALL others to a point they can be classified as another species.
Very interesting way to parse the species/subspecies classifications. I've always made the case when I'm around friendly types that the different races are actually different subspecies, just like there are different subspecies of zebras that are almost identical, or different subspecies of owls that can breed and produce other new sub species, but you make the claim that some races are actually different species. Fascinating way to look at it...
There was that genetic map which was about coyotes and wolves. There was a certain genetic distance, and they are considered different species altogether. The genetic distance between niggers and ALL others (humans) was even larger, and while all others were lined up in a prolonged area, as of niggers it was an isle.
Which implies that humans did indeed have common ancestors, and that there are gradual differences. As of niggers, the common ancestor, IF it existed at all (probably did), must have been much older, meaning the split must have occurred much further in the past.
So, as a simplified analogy - if humans did have a common ancestor, which is some kind of ape from 1000000 years ago, the common ancestor with, *ehm* homo niggerus, might be 5000000 years old.
But I don't say "niggers are not humans" disparagingly. There are plenty of animals we can coexist with. But niggers are a dangerous menace taking the place of humans, so regardless of classification, TND is a desirable/necessary outcome. The same goes for some other races, and they *are* human. Neither Arabs nor niggers would leave peacefully, so a race war is inevitable. Unless of course we want to carry the burden of "diversity" forever, and accept an ever increasing rate of degradation.
It's not a simple topic either, and I am not sure the Scientific Community™ properly understands it, but there are factors like this in play:
- The reproduction rate (and thus life span, and rate of maturity) of a species determines the frequency it does genetic alterations. A higher rate allows for quicker genetic adaptation.
- Intelligence is the ability for life forms to adapt to their environments in runtime instead of a genetic basis. For example an animal can learn that fruit X is toxic, it doesn't need to develop an immunity over the course of thousands of years or more. It is only humans that intelligence became super powerful as it allowed technology to develop.
- There are multiple factors in play, which is why genetic adaptation takes long periods of time. For example you'd think that having +10% fur due to decreased temperature would be best, but things like strength and health matter more. Only when a lack of fur causes physical issues, it becomes relevant. So these things often work indirectly.
It is unquestionable that we were and are subject to evolution, but only because we are, our origins are not certain. But even if we evolved from apes, so what? At some point we were of microscopic size, barely having multiple cells, swimming through water all the time. We don't have to be the all-time peak of nobility and honor. There are literal people out there who are depraved losers and idiots barely stumbling through life. It's arrogance to believe that 1. we were always like this, and 2. we'll always be like this.
Btw niggers are a different species. Other races like pajeets are actually other races. But niggers are genetically different from ALL others to a point they can be classified as another species. Which is why I generally refer to niggers as a different species, not race. Niggers are literally not humans, just as apes are not humans.
Very interesting way to parse the species/subspecies classifications. I've always made the case when I'm around friendly types that the different races are actually different subspecies, just like there are different subspecies of zebras that are almost identical, or different subspecies of owls that can breed and produce other new sub species, but you make the claim that some races are actually different species. Fascinating way to look at it...
Which implies that humans did indeed have common ancestors, and that there are gradual differences. As of niggers, the common ancestor, IF it existed at all (probably did), must have been much older, meaning the split must have occurred much further in the past.
So, as a simplified analogy - if humans did have a common ancestor, which is some kind of ape from 1000000 years ago, the common ancestor with, *ehm* homo niggerus, might be 5000000 years old.
But I don't say "niggers are not humans" disparagingly. There are plenty of animals we can coexist with. But niggers are a dangerous menace taking the place of humans, so regardless of classification, TND is a desirable/necessary outcome. The same goes for some other races, and they *are* human. Neither Arabs nor niggers would leave peacefully, so a race war is inevitable. Unless of course we want to carry the burden of "diversity" forever, and accept an ever increasing rate of degradation.