op pic from https://archive.is/Ur17L
evidence Darwin is a kike? https://archive.is/Z6x3d
>This attempt to insult Darwin by categorizing him as Jewish surprised me because I thought everyone always knew Darwin was “a member of the tribe.” I attended Hebrew school in preparation for my bar mitzvah, and the classroom featured pictures of our top-three historical figures: Abraham, Moses and Darwin. (There was also a small photograph of Paul Newman, who was half-Jewish.) We learned how Darwin received a fantastic bar mitzvah gift of a five-year ocean cruise on the HMS Beagle. I got savings bonds.
>Though common knowledge in the Jewish community, Darwin's Judaic background seems to be a shock to many non-Jews. I have only just learned, for example, that most readers of Darwin's many publications do not know that the versions with which they are familiar are highly edited. The great evolutionist wrote in a very particular Jewish style, which his Victorian publisher then revised into highbrow 19th-century English.
evidence Darwin is a kike? https://archive.is/Z6x3d
>This attempt to insult Darwin by categorizing him as Jewish surprised me because I thought everyone always knew Darwin was “a member of the tribe.” I attended Hebrew school in preparation for my bar mitzvah, and the classroom featured pictures of our top-three historical figures: Abraham, Moses and Darwin. (There was also a small photograph of Paul Newman, who was half-Jewish.) We learned how Darwin received a fantastic bar mitzvah gift of a five-year ocean cruise on the HMS Beagle. I got savings bonds.
>Though common knowledge in the Jewish community, Darwin's Judaic background seems to be a shock to many non-Jews. I have only just learned, for example, that most readers of Darwin's many publications do not know that the versions with which they are familiar are highly edited. The great evolutionist wrote in a very particular Jewish style, which his Victorian publisher then revised into highbrow 19th-century English.
like the theory we come from monkeys kinda make sense if you go to niggerball stadiums and look at all the swarthoids there
but again, its whole purpose seems to distract you from the greatness that humanity (Europe) has achieved
(also to diss the bible and its "origin story" with "we wuz monkeyz n shiet)
The so called evolution could only happen if there were any form of race mixing between humans and monkeys, which to be fair could have occurred in some nigger cultures over time. Hence why some niggers are genetically closer to monkeys than humans.
Has DNA evidence suggested this?
I'm pretty sure that the anthropologist Robert Sepehr has suggested that this is the case.
I don't personally believe in evolution. I do believe natural selection probably occurs and evolution can happen WITHIN a species.
I also think that maybe new creatures sort of just appear. Like magically. I can't explain. Maybe God creates them and they come out of some kind of portal. I've heard people claim that a woman's womb itself is a portal. What I'm saying is that I think NEW species appear today, still, not from evolution but from some other kind of phenomenon that science hasn't explained or really theorized yet.
It's not a simple topic either, and I am not sure the Scientific Community™ properly understands it, but there are factors like this in play:
- The reproduction rate (and thus life span, and rate of maturity) of a species determines the frequency it does genetic alterations. A higher rate allows for quicker genetic adaptation.
- Intelligence is the ability for life forms to adapt to their environments in runtime instead of a genetic basis. For example an animal can learn that fruit X is toxic, it doesn't need to develop an immunity over the course of thousands of years or more. It is only humans that intelligence became super powerful as it allowed technology to develop.
- There are multiple factors in play, which is why genetic adaptation takes long periods of time. For example you'd think that having +10% fur due to decreased temperature would be best, but things like strength and health matter more. Only when a lack of fur causes physical issues, it becomes relevant. So these things often work indirectly.
It is unquestionable that we were and are subject to evolution, but only because we are, our origins are not certain. But even if we evolved from apes, so what? At some point we were of microscopic size, barely having multiple cells, swimming through water all the time. We don't have to be the all-time peak of nobility and honor. There are literal people out there who are depraved losers and idiots barely stumbling through life. It's arrogance to believe that 1. we were always like this, and 2. we'll always be like this.
Btw niggers are a different species. Other races like pajeets are actually other races. But niggers are genetically different from ALL others to a point they can be classified as another species. Which is why I generally refer to niggers as a different species, not race. Niggers are literally not humans, just as apes are not humans.
Very interesting way to parse the species/subspecies classifications. I've always made the case when I'm around friendly types that the different races are actually different subspecies, just like there are different subspecies of zebras that are almost identical, or different subspecies of owls that can breed and produce other new sub species, but you make the claim that some races are actually different species. Fascinating way to look at it...
Which implies that humans did indeed have common ancestors, and that there are gradual differences. As of niggers, the common ancestor, IF it existed at all (probably did), must have been much older, meaning the split must have occurred much further in the past.
So, as a simplified analogy - if humans did have a common ancestor, which is some kind of ape from 1000000 years ago, the common ancestor with, *ehm* homo niggerus, might be 5000000 years old.
But I don't say "niggers are not humans" disparagingly. There are plenty of animals we can coexist with. But niggers are a dangerous menace taking the place of humans, so regardless of classification, TND is a desirable/necessary outcome. The same goes for some other races, and they *are* human. Neither Arabs nor niggers would leave peacefully, so a race war is inevitable. Unless of course we want to carry the burden of "diversity" forever, and accept an ever increasing rate of degradation.