You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
ValuesLiberty on scored.co
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> Other races like pajeets are actually other races. But niggers are genetically different from ALL others to a point they can be classified as another species.
Very interesting way to parse the species/subspecies classifications. I've always made the case when I'm around friendly types that the different races are actually different subspecies, just like there are different subspecies of zebras that are almost identical, or different subspecies of owls that can breed and produce other new sub species, but you make the claim that some races are actually different species. Fascinating way to look at it...
There was that genetic map which was about coyotes and wolves. There was a certain genetic distance, and they are considered different species altogether. The genetic distance between niggers and ALL others (humans) was even larger, and while all others were lined up in a prolonged area, as of niggers it was an isle.
Which implies that humans did indeed have common ancestors, and that there are gradual differences. As of niggers, the common ancestor, IF it existed at all (probably did), must have been much older, meaning the split must have occurred much further in the past.
So, as a simplified analogy - if humans did have a common ancestor, which is some kind of ape from 1000000 years ago, the common ancestor with, *ehm* homo niggerus, might be 5000000 years old.
But I don't say "niggers are not humans" disparagingly. There are plenty of animals we can coexist with. But niggers are a dangerous menace taking the place of humans, so regardless of classification, TND is a desirable/necessary outcome. The same goes for some other races, and they *are* human. Neither Arabs nor niggers would leave peacefully, so a race war is inevitable. Unless of course we want to carry the burden of "diversity" forever, and accept an ever increasing rate of degradation.
Very interesting way to parse the species/subspecies classifications. I've always made the case when I'm around friendly types that the different races are actually different subspecies, just like there are different subspecies of zebras that are almost identical, or different subspecies of owls that can breed and produce other new sub species, but you make the claim that some races are actually different species. Fascinating way to look at it...
Which implies that humans did indeed have common ancestors, and that there are gradual differences. As of niggers, the common ancestor, IF it existed at all (probably did), must have been much older, meaning the split must have occurred much further in the past.
So, as a simplified analogy - if humans did have a common ancestor, which is some kind of ape from 1000000 years ago, the common ancestor with, *ehm* homo niggerus, might be 5000000 years old.
But I don't say "niggers are not humans" disparagingly. There are plenty of animals we can coexist with. But niggers are a dangerous menace taking the place of humans, so regardless of classification, TND is a desirable/necessary outcome. The same goes for some other races, and they *are* human. Neither Arabs nor niggers would leave peacefully, so a race war is inevitable. Unless of course we want to carry the burden of "diversity" forever, and accept an ever increasing rate of degradation.