1 year ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)2 children
The problem with China is that it has been a racial blender since forever because it's massive (and unlike, say, Russia, all regions of it are well populated).
The bottom half of China is effectively populated by southeast Asians, who are lower tier asians than Northern asians. The true Han are a pale skinned and intelligent northerly race originating near the Yellow River and are responsible for its wonders is bygone ages.
True mongoloids, with pale skin, and basal east asians are derivatives and a divergence from a similar northern stock that gives us Europeans today. Haplogroup R is a cousin of the east Asian haplogroups O and N. Brown skin in east asia that doesn't come as a result of a natural tan is from lower races, and this is the reason why on the one hand China has historically created some of the greatest works ever seen, and, on the other, gutter oil and the dog eating festival (located in far southern China, interesting).
Another litmus test besides skin color is craniometry. The side profile of a pure Han Chinese (or any other northeast Asian race) should have a prefrontal cortex (forehead) equal to the slope of the jaw in length. Like in white people. Southern descended races have a jaw slope that exceeds the forehead, such as in blacks.
I an personally a proponent of the out of Asia theory in regards to anatomically modern humans (niggers evolved in Africa and are not even modern humans). Mostly because of the sheer human diversity coming out of Asia and the spread of haplogroups of Asian origin. Dravidians, ainu, aboriginals, native americans, Mongoloids, negritos, Polynesians, and indo Europeans are all of Asian origin to at least some extent. The caucasoid physiognomy is the basal type and the mongoloid physiognomy is a derivative thereof. The last migration out of east asia into the west (by caucasians, not mongoloids) happened 20k years ago, and paternally we are their descendants as they gave rise to the yamnaya culture and gave us haplogroup R.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
“China” geographically is a modern invention thanks to the tiny hats.
You had distinct ethnic groups in distinct regions for the most part. Then they did to them what they did to Eastern Europeans after the war.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
It's not even just the CCP though. Republican China was a big contributor to this, and Qing China was such a fucking disaster for the last century that a lot of the Chinese just started viewing themselves as "Manchu vs not manchu". Lots of factors.
Jews most definitely helped out with this though, don't get me wrong.
Although the far southern Chinese were barely even considered as humans at any point until very recently. The 5 races under one union flag only acknowledged the northerly "high" races of china: the Han, the Manchu, the Mongols, the Hui, and the Tibetans. Nobody gave a fuck about the Yao for instance.
Caveat: Most of the southern groups are now majority Han through conquest and assimilation, but their southern roots are still evident from how they act in general.
Haplogroups are almost useless with mainland east asians outside of outliers because of extreme founder effect from haplogroup O because the Han pillaged and fucked everything like the yamnaya in Europe, central, and south asia. Finding an east asian with no han blood is like finding a european that has no indo european blood. My assumption is that the natives probably looked like Cambodians or Burmese because of the piddling out of mongoloid phenotypes from the Han into dravidian ones as you move west from Vietnam. They wouldn't have evolved mongoloid phenotypes on their own in the jungles of southeast Asia, because it's a cold weather adapted phenotype. So we can put to bed the idea that they always looked like that.
You always add some of the most fascinating genetic history to conversations around here. Apologies if this has been asked before, but have you written a book on all this? If not, do you plan to? I would buy it in a heartbeat.
Hmmm, I've written for some papers before and I've provided some people online and on youtube with background research, but I haven't written any actual book on it. It may be something to consider, in the future, when I have time to do it. Perhaps when I can sit down for a while and relax after retiring I can devote the time that this topic deserves.
But the most important thing to remember is this, and this is what jews hate people remembering, that race is real and that whites are more related to themselves than to any nigger.
Northern Whites > southern whites > Levantine Arabs and berbers > northern indians > gulf Arabs > turkic tribes > native Americans > Han chinese, Japanese, mongols, and Koreans > dravidian Indians > Polynesians > Southeastern asians > Australian aboriginals > niggers
Slightly different path for southern Europeans. Northern Europeans have more affinity for east asians than Southern ones. So for a mediterannean all caucasoid groups will precede all east Asian groups. Almost all Europeans unless you have haplogroup J, I, or e1b1b, have paternal y dna affinity with all east asians over all other caucasians because R is derived from what Tianyuan related people brought to Siberia, and likewise spread all through Europe. Us R haplogroup enjoyers ultimately trace our paternal lineage to China, though the overwhelming amounts of maternal native European and Middle eastern blood makes the actual east Asian proportion of our blood incredibly small. And even then, it wasn't mongoloid in the first place.
Noah was the father of all people who aren't niggers. Ham is the father of native North Africans and canaanites, shem is the father of many Europeans, dravidians, and every middle eastern group that isn't of ham, and japheth, being enlarged as per the Bible, is the father of europeans (especially Northern Europeans), all mongoloid groups, and he dwells in the tents of shem (his descendants took over what was originally Semitic land in Europe).
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
I know *why*, but I currently don't have the sources and citations to prove my claims. Going to try to find those sources again and break it down.
But essentially: At some point in history, I believe the jews were allowed into Japan and may have interbred with and/or raped some of them. That's why you might see jewish features in *some* of them, because not all of the Japanese have those jew-like features in their face. Like most Asians, they would have had flat, fat/wide noses.
Actually, yeah. That's part of what I was going to go into.
A long while back, I found a blog page that talked about the "mountain jews" in Japan that the tengu are based off of along with what they did to the Japanese and how they interacted with them. It had sources and citations on it and all that.
Really sucks that I can't seem to find it again because I can't remember the exact terms I used to find it and so far my search has been fruitless. I am certain the page isn't shoah'd, though.
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
i was thinking why asians have slanted eyes.
I squint my eyes like that when i am in the snow. The sun hits the snow and it becomes so bright i have to squint my eyes while i work outside in the snow.
If these people lived during long ice age then maybe the people with slanted or squinted eyes had greater survival rate and survived in the snowy tundra while the rest of the people went blind and got eaten by polar bears and woolly mammoths and saber tooth tigers. Haha
Evidence for my theory: https://www.beyondbuckskin.com/2012/04/some-history-slick-inuit-shades.html
Your evidence points to tools and tool making as the primary factors of survival rates. Shades are technology. Squinting isn't. Higher tech rapidly improves survival odds.
(((They))) forced them into the same racial blender and ethnic tension after WW2.
The bottom half of China is effectively populated by southeast Asians, who are lower tier asians than Northern asians. The true Han are a pale skinned and intelligent northerly race originating near the Yellow River and are responsible for its wonders is bygone ages.
True mongoloids, with pale skin, and basal east asians are derivatives and a divergence from a similar northern stock that gives us Europeans today. Haplogroup R is a cousin of the east Asian haplogroups O and N. Brown skin in east asia that doesn't come as a result of a natural tan is from lower races, and this is the reason why on the one hand China has historically created some of the greatest works ever seen, and, on the other, gutter oil and the dog eating festival (located in far southern China, interesting).
Another litmus test besides skin color is craniometry. The side profile of a pure Han Chinese (or any other northeast Asian race) should have a prefrontal cortex (forehead) equal to the slope of the jaw in length. Like in white people. Southern descended races have a jaw slope that exceeds the forehead, such as in blacks.
I an personally a proponent of the out of Asia theory in regards to anatomically modern humans (niggers evolved in Africa and are not even modern humans). Mostly because of the sheer human diversity coming out of Asia and the spread of haplogroups of Asian origin. Dravidians, ainu, aboriginals, native americans, Mongoloids, negritos, Polynesians, and indo Europeans are all of Asian origin to at least some extent. The caucasoid physiognomy is the basal type and the mongoloid physiognomy is a derivative thereof. The last migration out of east asia into the west (by caucasians, not mongoloids) happened 20k years ago, and paternally we are their descendants as they gave rise to the yamnaya culture and gave us haplogroup R.
You had distinct ethnic groups in distinct regions for the most part. Then they did to them what they did to Eastern Europeans after the war.
Jews most definitely helped out with this though, don't get me wrong.
Although the far southern Chinese were barely even considered as humans at any point until very recently. The 5 races under one union flag only acknowledged the northerly "high" races of china: the Han, the Manchu, the Mongols, the Hui, and the Tibetans. Nobody gave a fuck about the Yao for instance.
Caveat: Most of the southern groups are now majority Han through conquest and assimilation, but their southern roots are still evident from how they act in general.
Haplogroups are almost useless with mainland east asians outside of outliers because of extreme founder effect from haplogroup O because the Han pillaged and fucked everything like the yamnaya in Europe, central, and south asia. Finding an east asian with no han blood is like finding a european that has no indo european blood. My assumption is that the natives probably looked like Cambodians or Burmese because of the piddling out of mongoloid phenotypes from the Han into dravidian ones as you move west from Vietnam. They wouldn't have evolved mongoloid phenotypes on their own in the jungles of southeast Asia, because it's a cold weather adapted phenotype. So we can put to bed the idea that they always looked like that.
But the most important thing to remember is this, and this is what jews hate people remembering, that race is real and that whites are more related to themselves than to any nigger.
Northern Whites > southern whites > Levantine Arabs and berbers > northern indians > gulf Arabs > turkic tribes > native Americans > Han chinese, Japanese, mongols, and Koreans > dravidian Indians > Polynesians > Southeastern asians > Australian aboriginals > niggers
Slightly different path for southern Europeans. Northern Europeans have more affinity for east asians than Southern ones. So for a mediterannean all caucasoid groups will precede all east Asian groups. Almost all Europeans unless you have haplogroup J, I, or e1b1b, have paternal y dna affinity with all east asians over all other caucasians because R is derived from what Tianyuan related people brought to Siberia, and likewise spread all through Europe. Us R haplogroup enjoyers ultimately trace our paternal lineage to China, though the overwhelming amounts of maternal native European and Middle eastern blood makes the actual east Asian proportion of our blood incredibly small. And even then, it wasn't mongoloid in the first place.
Noah was the father of all people who aren't niggers. Ham is the father of native North Africans and canaanites, shem is the father of many Europeans, dravidians, and every middle eastern group that isn't of ham, and japheth, being enlarged as per the Bible, is the father of europeans (especially Northern Europeans), all mongoloid groups, and he dwells in the tents of shem (his descendants took over what was originally Semitic land in Europe).