I would disagree with modern jews being responsible for the Deicide , because the Jews who actually killed Him were killed off by the Romans well before the current frauds showed up on the scene (though its possible that some of the reprobates who condemned Christ did have some role in founding the Talmudic religion); but the modern jews definitely would kill Him if they could, though the one crime they ironically are not guilty of is the one they claim everyone "wrongly" hates them for.
Otherwise, condemning modern judaism, which is completely Satanic in nature, should be a good litmus test for legitimate apologists. Obviously, most will not be calling for TKD (one, because death is too kind a fate for (((them)))) because they would be banned from social media, and its hard to do apologetics when no one can listen to you.
Otherwise, condemning modern judaism, which is completely Satanic in nature, should be a good litmus test for legitimate apologists. Obviously, most will not be calling for TKD (one, because death is too kind a fate for (((them)))) because they would be banned from social media, and its hard to do apologetics when no one can listen to you.
Yes, that's TECHNICALLY true, but it is also true that the Romans wouldn't have killed Jesus save for the jews LYING about what he did and how he did it.
They literally couldn't even find the 2 witnesses required by Moses to condemn him, as the witnesses were contradicting each other.
They've been applying their "Rules for Radicals" for centuries:
> "Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have."
> "Keep the pressure on. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself."
> "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."