New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Quick PSA

If you find a christian online, be it youtube, a blog whatever, assume this person has built their reputation around debunking other religions. Islam, Paganism, other Christian sects, etc.

If they do not mention judaism a single time, it's a false preacher. We all know who the bad guy is here. It's not some dipshit worshipping Odin. It's not the umpteen-billionth Protestant sect that believes in washing feet a different way. It's not Abdul from Afghanistan.

You see this all the time with various new age "christian" commentators online.

It's the fucking jew. Who killed Jesus? Jews did. Who wrote that Jesus is boiling alive in hell? Jews did. Who bases their entire existence around denying the Messiah who *came for them*? Jews. Who is trying to eliminate Christianity? Jews.

If you see someone who is quick to rebuke any religion you can think about, but refuses to rebuke judaism, they're lying to you. They're intentionally trying to obfuscate your view into believing that the enemy is someone else other than jews. By not mentioning jews, they're doing as much damage as if they praised jews.

If you build your framework around believing that "x religion (besides judaism) and x sect of Christianity = le bad", and you are never told about jews at all, eventually you will arrive at the logical conclusion of "judaism = good because my favorite faggot youtubers never mentioned it in their diatribes."

You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
I would disagree with modern jews being responsible for the Deicide , because the Jews who actually killed Him were killed off by the Romans well before the current frauds showed up on the scene (though its possible that some of the reprobates who condemned Christ did have some role in founding the Talmudic religion); but the modern jews definitely would kill Him if they could, though the one crime they ironically are not guilty of is the one they claim everyone "wrongly" hates them for.

Otherwise, condemning modern judaism, which is completely Satanic in nature, should be a good litmus test for legitimate apologists. Obviously, most will not be calling for TKD (one, because death is too kind a fate for (((them)))) because they would be banned from social media, and its hard to do apologetics when no one can listen to you.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
>I would disagree with modern jews being responsible for the Deicide

>Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ? They all say unto him, Let him be crucified. And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified. When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, **he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person**: see **ye** to it. **Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.** ~ Matthew 27:22-25

Which is why we have such quotes as these:

> “Do not add to your sins by saying that the Covenant is both theirs and ours. Yes, it is ours, but [jews] lost it forever.” **~ St. Barnabas**; 61 AD

> “When these Scriptural words are quoted to the Jews, they scorn the Gospel and the Apostle; they do not listen to what we say because they do not understand what they read... We are not, therefore, rousing you from a deep and heavy sleep to spiritual matters which you do not grasp. Nor are we now attempting to show you, blind and deaf as you are in your spiritual senses, how these words are to be accepted spiritually... You, in the person of your parents, have killed Christ. For a long time you have not believed in Him and you have opposed Him, but you are not yet lost, because you are still alive; you have time now for repentance; only come now. You should have come long ago, of course, but come now…” **~ St. Augustine of Hippo**; *Against the Jews*; 429 AD; recorded in *Patrologia Latina* vol. 42; 1865; English translation in *Treatises on Marriage & Other Subjects*; 1955
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
They are their descendants. Heavily inbred and mongrelized descendants, but their descendants nonetheless.

The romans did not destroy the entire population of judea, because thats... well, about impossible to accomplish. The survivors left and came into Central Asia, central and Eastern Europe, and some in southern europe. They mixed with every people they came across and started inbreeding to avoid dying off.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yes, but that amount of mixing is effectively the death of their race.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
They ARE a dead race. They're the mutant offspring of people who believed in the one drop rule. The pharisees who killed Christ would be just as likely to massacre their own descendants if they had a look at them.

Jews today have the same superiority complex as whatever number of pharisaical ancestors they may have, but they have absolutely nothing to back it with because their bloodline has been completely annihilated both in actuality and by every one of their own definitions.

That's the neat part though. They're larping as their ancestors who would have hated them. Everything they say and do is a lie and they know it. Their existence has always hinged on other people believing their bullshit.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>The pharisees who killed Christ would be just as likely to massacre their own descendants if they had a look at them.

Thats kinda what I was getting at, it would be like one of us going 500 years into the future to find out all of our descendants had miscegenated with nogs but still called themselves whites and claimed to have invented a civilization they would be incapable of maintaining. Though in this case, I think modern jews probably have less actual Jew in them than the average White or Mediterranian Christian, since the original Christians were the Jews who had accepted Christ, and who presumably saw the writing on the wall and realized they would never have a racial homeland on this earth again, and thus likely also were mixed into the populations of wherever they had fled to.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The jews that followed Christ mixed into populations that they were already closely related to who accepted early Christianity. Nabateans, Assyrians, Copts, Armenians, Greeks, and eventually Romans and the rest of Europe. They also did not inbreed because they had no need to do so.

We probably have blood from these jews (and also those near Eastern civilizations) and would have absolutely no way of knowing otherwise. But, in reality, the blood of europeans and the blood of ancient near easterners (and even some extant communities over there) is damn near one and the same. The jews who followed Christ effectively remained pure (as they only mixed with those they were already kindred with) and lost their identity as the chosen of God. The jews who did not follow him mongrelized themselves into oblivion and tried to retain their identity as the chosen people.
Toast message