Quick PSA
If you find a christian online, be it youtube, a blog whatever, assume this person has built their reputation around debunking other religions. Islam, Paganism, other Christian sects, etc.
If they do not mention judaism a single time, it's a false preacher. We all know who the bad guy is here. It's not some dipshit worshipping Odin. It's not the umpteen-billionth Protestant sect that believes in washing feet a different way. It's not Abdul from Afghanistan.
You see this all the time with various new age "christian" commentators online.
It's the fucking jew. Who killed Jesus? Jews did. Who wrote that Jesus is boiling alive in hell? Jews did. Who bases their entire existence around denying the Messiah who *came for them*? Jews. Who is trying to eliminate Christianity? Jews.
If you see someone who is quick to rebuke any religion you can think about, but refuses to rebuke judaism, they're lying to you. They're intentionally trying to obfuscate your view into believing that the enemy is someone else other than jews. By not mentioning jews, they're doing as much damage as if they praised jews.
If you build your framework around believing that "x religion (besides judaism) and x sect of Christianity = le bad", and you are never told about jews at all, eventually you will arrive at the logical conclusion of "judaism = good because my favorite faggot youtubers never mentioned it in their diatribes."
Thats kinda what I was getting at, it would be like one of us going 500 years into the future to find out all of our descendants had miscegenated with nogs but still called themselves whites and claimed to have invented a civilization they would be incapable of maintaining. Though in this case, I think modern jews probably have less actual Jew in them than the average White or Mediterranian Christian, since the original Christians were the Jews who had accepted Christ, and who presumably saw the writing on the wall and realized they would never have a racial homeland on this earth again, and thus likely also were mixed into the populations of wherever they had fled to.
We probably have blood from these jews (and also those near Eastern civilizations) and would have absolutely no way of knowing otherwise. But, in reality, the blood of europeans and the blood of ancient near easterners (and even some extant communities over there) is damn near one and the same. The jews who followed Christ effectively remained pure (as they only mixed with those they were already kindred with) and lost their identity as the chosen of God. The jews who did not follow him mongrelized themselves into oblivion and tried to retain their identity as the chosen people.
The great irony is that the jews who followed Christ still *were* the Chosen, while the ones who rejected Him are reprobates rejected *by* Him.
You're correct, I meant that they lost their identity as a special race of God's chosen people
>reprobate rejected by Him
Also undoubtedly correct, I was pointing out how they still try to use this as leverage despite the fact that, even if there were no new Israel in the church for some reason, they would still be invalid because they are mutts