New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
63
posted 1 year ago by Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +63Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Lord_Cthulhu on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Jesus of Nazareth!

(Was that right?)
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 2 children
Jesus was an Israelite, not a jew.

Jesus was not a jew - Bertrand L. Comparet https://www.bitchute.com/video/XXNPmcuA2PoH
 
Jesus Was not a Jew - Dr James P Wickstrom https://www.bitchute.com/video/9vLlLdqeYyBp
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 3 children
Jesus literally was an ethnic Jew.

Any Christian who can't reconcile that with their Nationalist views will never be taken seriously outside of their little echo chambers.
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 2 children
>John 7:13 Howbeit no man spake openly of him for fear of the Jews.

The disciples and Jesus hid, and did not speak openly of Jesus, for fear of THE JEWS. A people apart from their own. An adversarial group. A group they were not a part of. They hid for fear of THE JEWS, not of their own kin.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror ) 2 children
What a reach... Jesus and his disciples aren't even present in that verse, in context. The only two participant groups in the scene being described are the Pharisees/Jews looking for Jesus, and the people whispering amongst themselves about Jesus, who fear said Jews. Jesus himself is not being identified with a group on either side of the verse you quoted.

> 2 Samuel 2:4: "Then the men of Judah came to Hebron, and there they anointed David king over the tribe of Judah."

> Matthew 1:1-2: "This is the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah the son of David, the son of Abraham: Abraham was the father of Isaac, Isaac the father of Jacob..."

> Hebrews 7:14
"For it is evident that our Lord was descended from Judah..."

"Muh Israelites." Yeah, there *were* twelve tribes of Israel, which were apparently distinct groups, but the tribe of Judah is the one specifically from which we get ethnic Jews, literally in the name. Jesus is explicitly stated to trace his genealogy through this line.

> Luke 2:21: "On the eighth day, when it was time to circumcise the child, he was named Jesus..."

> Luke 2:41-42: "Every year Jesus’ parents went to Jerusalem for the Festival of the Passover. When he was twelve years old, they went up to the festival, according to the custom."

He was circumcised and celebrated Passover.

> John 4:22: "You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews."

Jesus himself identifying with the Jewish ethnic group.

> 1. John 1:38
"Turning around, Jesus saw them following and asked, 'What do you want?' They said, 'Rabbi' (which means Teacher), 'where are you staying?'"

> 2. John 1:49
"Then Nathanael declared, 'Rabbi, you are the Son of God; you are the king of Israel.'"

> 3. John 3:2
"He came to Jesus at night and said, 'Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher who has come from God. For no one could perform the signs you are doing if God were not with him.'"

> 4. Mark 11:21
"Peter remembered and said to Jesus, 'Rabbi, look! The fig tree you cursed has withered!'"

> 5. John 9:2
"His disciples asked Him, 'Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?'"

Rabbi.

> John 4:9
"The Samaritan woman said to Him, ‘How is it that you, a Jew, ask for a drink from me, a woman of Samaria?’"

Presented without comment.

It's all right there, bro. I'm not the schizo for believing what the text plainly says to your face.
Keaton on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
That was an amazing response and I greatly enjoyed reading it. No pointless insults, started off with a rebuttal to the previous argument, and has a bunch of verses that plainly support yours. A testament to why it’s important to actually read the Bible.
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Good argument. I will try to counter later
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Typically, it's supposed to be a smuggie gotcha, referring to the belief that Jesus was not a Jew religiously, even if he was racially (which is debatable in itself.)

However, they rarely elaborate this point to people who express your understandable confusion, instead laughing you off in scorn for not knowing their little inside joke.

This is why I always point out the very specific tidbit of Jesus being an *ethnic* Jew, which he was.
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 2 children
Yeah. *Was*. As in, *no longer is*. The crucial thing you fail to understand is that the kikes of today have nothing in common with the jews of the OT. They are not even the same ethnic group. They simply usurped the title to trick stupid people. They admit to all this, too.

https://files.catbox.moe/ykfrf8.png

The kikes were *there* in Jesus' time, and they had done what kikes always do. Subverted their way to the top (pharisees et al.) and were corrupting all the common people below. The reversal of which was literally Jesus' entire mission here on earth. But they were very markedly a *different group of people* than everybody else.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
Nothing in common, you say?

So you're saying the group of people in biblical times referred to as Jews who practiced circumcision, followed the levitical law, and subverted their way up through society don't have so much as a chromosome in common with the group of people referred to as Jews who practice circumcision, follow the levitical law, and subvert their way up through society today?

In a stroke of cunning, are the so called "Jews" of current year only *playing* at having an obsession with genital mutilation, in an attempt to better connect themselves to the story of 1 Samuel 18, wherein King Saul has David bring him the foreskins of 200 slaughtered Philistines in exchange for his daughter?
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Uncle A would say the same on that.
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
If you really knew about circumcision, you would know that the very practice of it today is radically different than the one that was practiced 2,000 years ago (even though the jews still had it wrong back then). You would know that that was one of the things changed in the overhauls of judaism following the events of 70-132 AD when it was mutated by the kikes into the goyim destruction machine we see today, culminating with the creation of the talmud in ~500AD. This so-called "judaism" of today is *again* not at all in common with even the religion practiced by who I would dub the "good jews" of back then, the ones who all correctly recognized Jesus as the messiah and who abandoned judaism as they were supposed to, because the kikes changed it all post-Hadrian by converting it to the satanic black-magic practice it is now. Neither the same are the ethnic groups behind it. Like I said, the kike element was always *there* (their leaders such as david the adulterer and bloodthirsty warmongerer, and solomon the moloch worshipper are examples of this) but they did not make of the *entirety* of the jewish ethnic group until all the other "good jews" up and bailed.
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Sure. Because most people, including many of /ourguys/, are either too shortsighted or too historically illiterate to recognize the important distinction. This is exactly why the kikes assumed the mantle so hard, to try and keep Christians fooled. The early Christians were not fooled however. Saint John Chrysostom has some excellent homilies about this.
Kopkot on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Ya Jesus was a Jew, possible of the benjamin tribe through mary. And the whole reason they killed him was because he said they weren't any different then gentiles, as everyone has the choice of salvation through him and him alone. Basically threw the Jew privilege away and they couldn't accept that.
Lord_Cthulhu on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
Jesus and almost everyone he interacted with practiced some form of Second Temple Judaism Uou can colloquially say he was a Jew even if that is a modern term.

Ἰουδαῖοι (Ioudaioi) did have a broader meaning in the Levant, but by the time of the birth of Jesus, the term was VERY solidly an ethnoreligious term connected to Second Temple Judaism, even if also still occasionally used to describe region or tribal identity.

By the time we get to, say, Matthew 27:37 it is VERY if not completely used as an ethnoreligious identity.

Καὶ ἐπέθηκαν ἐπάνω τῆς κεφαλῆς αὐτοῦ τὴν αἰτίαν αὐτοῦ γεγραμμένην· Οὗτός ἐστιν Ἰησοῦς ὁ βασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων.

And they placed above His head the charge against Him written: 'This is Jesus, the King of the Jews.'
Toast message