They are both controlled by Satan and he doesn't want to wipe out his main power base, Israel. Better to use them both for a common goal.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
48 comments:
I remember some smart guy called Gaddafi, may he rest in peace, talking about that. He said that muslim countries are infighting too much and foreign countries, like israel and usa, are profiting from this.
they both strive for the destruction of the white man.
Muslims being dislocated to the west are deceived by (((them))) into hating the White man instead of the jew. They don't see kikes in their home country, they see American and European soldiers destroying their country. It's all (((by design))).
Notice how the jew fear any form of deportation program, or "help at home". I.e send the muslims back home and help them rebuild their countries. The jew knows that this will unite and turn those muslims against israel.
Notice how the jew fear any form of deportation program, or "help at home". I.e send the muslims back home and help them rebuild their countries. The jew knows that this will unite and turn those muslims against israel.
Because half of them are probably owned by jews, and even if they werent, the schism within Islam makes the internal Christian conflict following the Reformation look like a schoolyard squabble. Sunni and Shia hate each other more than they hate non-muslims.
Over there, maybe. Muslims living in the West are not even aware of the schism or why it occurred.
Its probably the "We are not so different as we had previously imagined" meme, but instead of the two chads figuring it out when exposed to savages, its two savages realizing they cant be savages unless they get rid of chad.
Most of the muslims in the West are sunni. They are not aware that shia even exists. Shia is the blood schism of muhammed. So when muhammed died, his sons wanted to carry on his legacy as the inheritors of his throne. Muhammed was red haired which means he was not Arab. His generals plotted against this and conspired to kill off his heirs. I forget some of the details, but the Arab centric generals won. His family and the shia schism fled to Iran from what I can remember. Been 16 years since I've had to study this stuff so I can't remember all the details so I probably got a lot wrong.
It's closer to the great schism than the reformation. I think that would be more apt. Although orthodox and Catholics don't hate each other as much anymore
After the great schism the 2 churches despised each other. Centuries of disputes ranging from name-calling to outright war and mass murder followed. The Greeks killed 60,000 Catholics in the 1100s just cause. The venetians sacked Constantinople. At many points both sides acrively preferred Muslims to each other.
This continued even into the 1800s with the crimean war basically being France's "fuck you" to the orthodox church because reasons.
I think this mirrors the sunni Shia schism. But the great schism was probably even more violent overall.
After the great schism the 2 churches despised each other. Centuries of disputes ranging from name-calling to outright war and mass murder followed. The Greeks killed 60,000 Catholics in the 1100s just cause. The venetians sacked Constantinople. At many points both sides acrively preferred Muslims to each other.
This continued even into the 1800s with the crimean war basically being France's "fuck you" to the orthodox church because reasons.
I think this mirrors the sunni Shia schism. But the great schism was probably even more violent overall.
Maybe, I dont know how much the two major branches of Islam differ, but I think the disagreement is mainly over Mohammed's successor.
Sunnis believe that the successor should be chosen by vote of an assembly, shiites believe that the successor should be a descendant of Mohammad.
It's simple. The great schism is such a clusterfuck that there's still inquiry into how the hell this happened 1000 years later. Chief reason given is the filioque. That is far from the only reason, just the straw that broke the camels back. There are dozens if not hundreds of reasons why the great schism happened.
It can be summed up as follows:
Islam schism: succession issues
Great schism: 1000 years of slight theological differences between eastern and western catholicism snowballing into creating 2 completely different sects
Reformation: the western catholic church pissed a bunch of people off
It's simple. The great schism is such a clusterfuck that there's still inquiry into how the hell this happened 1000 years later. Chief reason given is the filioque. That is far from the only reason, just the straw that broke the camels back. There are dozens if not hundreds of reasons why the great schism happened.
It can be summed up as follows:
Islam schism: succession issues
Great schism: 1000 years of slight theological differences between eastern and western catholicism snowballing into creating 2 completely different sects
Reformation: the western catholic church pissed a bunch of people off
Because they are ZOG'd.
For the same reason Whites cannot unite? Does it not seem that most of your fellow Whites are against you?
[The Six Day](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-Day_War) war was exactly what you say
and before that [a war in 1948 when israel claimed independence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Arab%E2%80%93Israeli_War)
and [a revolt when the heebs started migrating there](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1936%E2%80%931939_Arab_revolt_in_Palestine)
and before that [a war in 1948 when israel claimed independence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Arab%E2%80%93Israeli_War)
and [a revolt when the heebs started migrating there](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1936%E2%80%931939_Arab_revolt_in_Palestine)
If we ignore the (((subverters))) we all seem very united here. A common (((enemy))) is an excellent way to unite all kinds of people.
How many of you will attend a White church today and name the jew?
With what sort of hostility will you be met with by FELLOW WHITES who claim these lying anti-Christ KIKES are their fucking chosen peoples? White Boomers will get mad
With what sort of hostility will you be met with by FELLOW WHITES who claim these lying anti-Christ KIKES are their fucking chosen peoples? White Boomers will get mad
Yea I know there's plenty of shabbos goy idiots out there. I turned my local church antisemitic tho, it ain't much but it's honest work.
>I turned my local church antisemitic
Fuckin' Legend
I don't know how you did it. Respect.
I told my Bible study i don't like jews and heard a bunch of old wealthy boomers grumble "those who curse Israel will be cursed arrrrgh"
Fuckin' Legend
I don't know how you did it. Respect.
I told my Bible study i don't like jews and heard a bunch of old wealthy boomers grumble "those who curse Israel will be cursed arrrrgh"
Baby steps, same methods (((they))) used to program people in the first place can be used to de-program. Make use of your opportunities, people talk in villages. Anything happens and it won't take long until everyone knows.
Someone trying to make a cash deposit only to have it seized as "drug money", perfect time to jewpill them. Bank account shut down, now that's perfect. Loan rejected because farm isn't woke enough, brilliant, I wouldn't have to say much at all to get them to notice. Helps a lot than many were racist to being with.
That said, these methods should work in larger communities with more shabbos goys too. It'll just require a lot more time and patience.
Someone trying to make a cash deposit only to have it seized as "drug money", perfect time to jewpill them. Bank account shut down, now that's perfect. Loan rejected because farm isn't woke enough, brilliant, I wouldn't have to say much at all to get them to notice. Helps a lot than many were racist to being with.
That said, these methods should work in larger communities with more shabbos goys too. It'll just require a lot more time and patience.
Because the US will either subvert or outright destroy your country if you go against Israel.
Lebanon, Syria and Houthis were never a credible threat to Israel.
Lebanon, Syria and Houthis were never a credible threat to Israel.
Toast message
Iraq was decimated because of baathism. No other reason. Here's the neat part: israel supported Iran against Iraq, Iraq was actually about to go to to toe with Israel at some point and Israel would have went bye bye.
They know that there's not gonna be another caliphate to threaten them at all, so they're funding islamist extremism to remove actual arab nationalism. Iran owes its existence to Israel.
Baathism adjacent ideologies like Jamahiriya also get axed
What's actually a threat to Israel though? Baathist countries coming to fuck their world up. That and baathist insurgents like Naqshbandi. Which is why we always go through hell to eliminate legitimate governments like Saddam, Gaddafi, and Assad, but are awfully quiet with Iran, Bahrain, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia.
Firstly, no country has been Ba'athist since the late 1980's. Saddam effectively abandoned Ba'athism during the Iraq-Iran War and moved closer to Islam. The reason for this was that the Iraqis observed other events such as the 1989 Sudan coup that saw the beginnings of al-Bashir's vaguely 'Islamist' government and decided to bandwagon onto this trend, to 'go with the flow'.
The 1993 Faith Campaign saw the end of a good deal of the remaining sociocultural liberalism in Iraq, such as the Iraqi Ba'ath's previous permissive stances towards alcohol and prostitution.
I agree that Israel saw Iraq as a threat, but it was not because it was still Ba'athist. Rather, Iraq had been becoming 'anti-Semitic' long before al-Bakr and Saddam, and the situation only became more 'anti-Semitic' after their rise to power. Unless this is yid propaganda, the Mukhabarat secretly even kept the small zhiddish community in Iraq under close surveillance, keeping all sorts of records on every single yid they knew of.
Further, Saddam had built his 'million man army' and had other plans going on, such as the construction of the 'Supergun', which, if completed, would be able to strike Israel all the way from Iraq. This is what the yids were worried about: not Ba'athism but the more general 'anti-Semitism' that predated the Ba'ath.
Syria discarded Ba'athism even earlier. It was the Syrian Ba'ath, then under Hafez al-Assad, that actually had al-Bitar, one of Ba'athism's founders, assassinated. The Ba'athist 'Old Guard' disagreed with the likes of Jadid and al-Assad for being too ideologically close to Marxism.
As for your third paragraph, I doubt that Nasserists or any others who have certain overlap with the Ba'ath pose more of a threat to Israel than Islamists. The Nasserist Sadat practically betrayed them the last time they attempted it. They've demonstrated time and time again that they're too apathetic or weak to seriously commit to destroying Israel.
Most of those 'Arab nationalist' governments, such as those of Shishakli in Syria and of Qasem and the Nasserist Arif brothers in pre-Ba'athist Iraq, were useless. Many of these 'nationalists' were in actuality Leftists more interested in things like feminism and the rights of non-Arabs like Qasem with the Kurds than with our concerns. They were 'nationalists' only in the very broad sense of opposing rule by foreigners such as the British, French, and Turks. In particular, Israel is far more bothered by the Yemeni Houthis, who are amongst the 'Islamists', than they were by Yemen's Nasserist Republicans like Saleh. That is especially pleasing when the Houthis do not even control all of Yemen.