Why muslim countries are not united against Israel? What is going on is not a real war, is just retarded. They keep firing missiles at Israel randomly, then Israel responds with seriously destroying everything. Why Muslim countries can't just unite and erase Israel in 24 hours with all their weapons?
This shit is all retarded fake.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)
This needs some serious corrections.
Firstly, no country has been Ba'athist since the late 1980's. Saddam effectively abandoned Ba'athism during the Iraq-Iran War and moved closer to Islam. The reason for this was that the Iraqis observed other events such as the 1989 Sudan coup that saw the beginnings of al-Bashir's vaguely 'Islamist' government and decided to bandwagon onto this trend, to 'go with the flow'.
The 1993 Faith Campaign saw the end of a good deal of the remaining sociocultural liberalism in Iraq, such as the Iraqi Ba'ath's previous permissive stances towards alcohol and prostitution.
I agree that Israel saw Iraq as a threat, but it was not because it was still Ba'athist. Rather, Iraq had been becoming 'anti-Semitic' long before al-Bakr and Saddam, and the situation only became more 'anti-Semitic' after their rise to power. Unless this is yid propaganda, the Mukhabarat secretly even kept the small zhiddish community in Iraq under close surveillance, keeping all sorts of records on every single yid they knew of.
Further, Saddam had built his 'million man army' and had other plans going on, such as the construction of the 'Supergun', which, if completed, would be able to strike Israel all the way from Iraq. This is what the yids were worried about: not Ba'athism but the more general 'anti-Semitism' that predated the Ba'ath.
Syria discarded Ba'athism even earlier. It was the Syrian Ba'ath, then under Hafez al-Assad, that actually had al-Bitar, one of Ba'athism's founders, assassinated. The Ba'athist 'Old Guard' disagreed with the likes of Jadid and al-Assad for being too ideologically close to Marxism.
As for your third paragraph, I doubt that Nasserists or any others who have certain overlap with the Ba'ath pose more of a threat to Israel than Islamists. The Nasserist Sadat practically betrayed them the last time they attempted it. They've demonstrated time and time again that they're too apathetic or weak to seriously commit to destroying Israel.
Most of those 'Arab nationalist' governments, such as those of Shishakli in Syria and of Qasem and the Nasserist Arif brothers in pre-Ba'athist Iraq, were useless. Many of these 'nationalists' were in actuality Leftists more interested in things like feminism and the rights of non-Arabs like Qasem with the Kurds than with our concerns. They were 'nationalists' only in the very broad sense of opposing rule by foreigners such as the British, French, and Turks. In particular, Israel is far more bothered by the Yemeni Houthis, who are amongst the 'Islamists', than they were by Yemen's Nasserist Republicans like Saleh. That is especially pleasing when the Houthis do not even control all of Yemen.
Firstly, no country has been Ba'athist since the late 1980's. Saddam effectively abandoned Ba'athism during the Iraq-Iran War and moved closer to Islam. The reason for this was that the Iraqis observed other events such as the 1989 Sudan coup that saw the beginnings of al-Bashir's vaguely 'Islamist' government and decided to bandwagon onto this trend, to 'go with the flow'.
The 1993 Faith Campaign saw the end of a good deal of the remaining sociocultural liberalism in Iraq, such as the Iraqi Ba'ath's previous permissive stances towards alcohol and prostitution.
I agree that Israel saw Iraq as a threat, but it was not because it was still Ba'athist. Rather, Iraq had been becoming 'anti-Semitic' long before al-Bakr and Saddam, and the situation only became more 'anti-Semitic' after their rise to power. Unless this is yid propaganda, the Mukhabarat secretly even kept the small zhiddish community in Iraq under close surveillance, keeping all sorts of records on every single yid they knew of.
Further, Saddam had built his 'million man army' and had other plans going on, such as the construction of the 'Supergun', which, if completed, would be able to strike Israel all the way from Iraq. This is what the yids were worried about: not Ba'athism but the more general 'anti-Semitism' that predated the Ba'ath.
Syria discarded Ba'athism even earlier. It was the Syrian Ba'ath, then under Hafez al-Assad, that actually had al-Bitar, one of Ba'athism's founders, assassinated. The Ba'athist 'Old Guard' disagreed with the likes of Jadid and al-Assad for being too ideologically close to Marxism.
As for your third paragraph, I doubt that Nasserists or any others who have certain overlap with the Ba'ath pose more of a threat to Israel than Islamists. The Nasserist Sadat practically betrayed them the last time they attempted it. They've demonstrated time and time again that they're too apathetic or weak to seriously commit to destroying Israel.
Most of those 'Arab nationalist' governments, such as those of Shishakli in Syria and of Qasem and the Nasserist Arif brothers in pre-Ba'athist Iraq, were useless. Many of these 'nationalists' were in actuality Leftists more interested in things like feminism and the rights of non-Arabs like Qasem with the Kurds than with our concerns. They were 'nationalists' only in the very broad sense of opposing rule by foreigners such as the British, French, and Turks. In particular, Israel is far more bothered by the Yemeni Houthis, who are amongst the 'Islamists', than they were by Yemen's Nasserist Republicans like Saleh. That is especially pleasing when the Houthis do not even control all of Yemen.