No nation and her people ever voted to be overrun by infinite niggers and muslims.
These are invariably top-down decisions forced upon the people.
They're not going to ask the japanese for permission either.
These are invariably top-down decisions forced upon the people.
They're not going to ask the japanese for permission either.
Japan has nothing to worry about, they're not nearly as Americanized as Sweden is, their cities are mostly car free, trains everywhere, walk able streets and so on. It would be insanely difficult for (((them))) to move even a small number of niggers into Japan as the people would instantly notice the problem and become racist.
Tho I wouldn't call Rosengård and Husby "normal looking places", those are some nasty Soviet looking neighborhoods built in the 50's. The whole idea was to build nigger enabling infrastructure, to stop people from noticing. Liberals and jews alike cried in pain when they connected those areas to the city center by bus and train, as well as when they built pedestrian bridges to other "fancier" neighborhoods.
> Oy vey! but but muh property value will go down REEEEE
Well fuck them, they should have thought of that before they voted green (pro mass immigration). Looks like even the green party is abandoning their mass immigration agenda now, saying that they will "focus on the environment only". Wonder why... maybe it wasn't so fun living among niggers when they themselves had to do it, not just poor people. 🤡🌎
Also not to mention they're already extremely "xenophobic". Which is a good thing to be.
Almost ALL major terrorist attacks that occurred on European soil in the past decade, whether they were instigated by vehicles or not, occurred in areas of high foot traffic. Where you can corral more people in to as tight an area as possible and thus maximize the damage potential. Hence why stadiums and concert arenas remain such a popular target. The second a person is on their own two-feet, without a moving protective metal cage or any other deterrent, that's when you're at your most vulnerable and niggers and shitcoons feel they can attack. Doubly so if you're in a country where firearms are illegal to carry. That's why phone stealing and other niggardly behavior is so popular in the UK at the moment. Because they know no-one is going to be able to shoot at them, and even on the blue moon someone does, they'll be punished a million times harder.
>Japan has nothing to worry about
Japan has a SHITTON to worry about if they don't get their birthrate up and continue to loosen their immigration restrictions. They've lost Abe at the worst possible time and the generation that remembers just how very real the threat of Communism was is dying of old age. Japan needs its own MAGA movement, and fast. Decades of financial success and a harmonious society has significantly dulled the Jap's ability to realize just how cut-throat the outside world is. Paris Syndrome affects Japanese tourists greatly when they visit Europe because of how different the big cities are, even compared to 30 years ago. But they cannot recognize the signs of this happening in their home country just yet.
>their cities are mostly car free, trains everywhere, walk able streets and so on.
LMAO, where the fuck did you get that idea from, NotJustKikes?
81% of Japanese citizens own a car at a rate of roughly 1.06 per household. This is mostly because of "kei" cars which aren't sold anywhere else and are a lot smaller than a family sedan. When given the option to self-sufficiency and being raised in a society that mounts pride on financial responsibility among other things, the majority of the population is going to take that option. Only when you introduce jews do you get stuff like pedestrianization which is the yid's weaponized ability to destroy family-run businesses in areas that relied heavily on out-of-town tourists stopping by.
Also very curious you added the roundel to the top of the A on Rosengard there - could just be a matter of copy-pasting, but I've long suspected you of being a yuro due to repeatedly dodging the question every time I bring up firearms, which would only make sense if you lived in a country where it wasn't possible to arm yourself.
>Liberals and jews alike cried in pain when they connected those areas to the city center by bus and train, as well as when they built pedestrian bridges to other "fancier" neighborhoods.
Why would they shriek in pain while their agenda's being fulfilled? There's a reason that one area of California (Oakland?) fought so hard against having rail infrastructure building leading up to it and cutting off the rest of the route. Because they knew the minute that happened, niggers would start moving in en masse. The second you give the nigger a cheap way to move about and one that they don't have to be personally responsible for, they'll take it. The most (((walkable))) cities on the planet like New York and London are also coincidentally the most violent. I wonder (((why)))?
Also watch as this comment and even unrelated ones I make on other Scored Communities all magically get -10 within 15 minutes of me posting them, regardless of the message. It means I'm over the mark and some fucking kike REALLY hates me for it. And it only started when I began questioning the user above me and his message a couple months back. Strange how it never happened in the 3 years I'd been on this website on this present account.