New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
An interesting article on optics (americanfuturist.net)
posted 1 year ago by WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
It's interesting and probably true.

For entry-levels, boiling it down to something like "the jews did this too", "thank the jews for this" would work better.

Tackling the holocaust is probably bit too much. It's the very thing that holds loyalty of the normie to jews and "mild" diversity in the first place. It's like nagging on the foundations of their beliefs. Once they realize what the jew is and always has been, it will automatically fall apart later on.

I think the most important thing is to bring attention to jewish involvement in all the things they complain about. "Mainstream media"? That's synonymous with the "jewish media."

"It doesn't matter who wins the vote, the jews control all of US politics, so they decide what will happen. And if Trump wins, they will be more timid in their pursuit of faggotry for 4 years."

Things like this are short and catchy. Not about arguing about details and throwing around evidence. If they try to play smart and try to play to the imaginary crowd in an attempt to make you look stupid, ignorant, bigoted, tell them "6 corporations own 96% of US media, which is known as the 'mainstream media', and they are owned by jews."

"So what?!" - "Well, what would you say if the entirety of television and radio is owned by Cuba and running it as they see fit? Or Russia, or North Korea, or China. Sure that would bother you, right? Well, in this case it's jews. And they haven't been kicked 1030+ times out of 109+ countries over 2 millennia for no reason. Maybe YOU have forgotten, but they didn't."
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You clearly haven't read the article. You're saying the exact opposite of what the article is suggesting.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
And who said I am supposed to regurgitate the article mindlessly 1:1? What revelations did you draw from the article?

Clearly it is irrelevant what you are as a person when you engage in anonymous conversations online, so the article has zero effect on that. Leading by example only works locally with people you interact with. And doing advertisements isn't going to work anyway.

The point is this: Simplify your points as to make it more accessible to normies with short attention spans. The media thing? 1 sentence. If they catch on, you can dig deeper. This also works locally.

This is the closest the article comes as to something applicable. The cigarette example is to be understood analogously.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You started your previous comment with "It's interesting and probably true" and then proceeded to say the exact opposite of the article, I found it strange.

In any case, even online you can communicate a certain image. That's what meme warfare is, and it is very effective.

This forum does a good job at presenting the National Socialists in a good light. Just look at our banner. So badass.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> and then proceeded to say the exact opposite of the article

It wasn't the opposite, it was actually quite related to it. The core point of the article was to simplify the message, to create an image instead of trying to convince.

While creating an image is it's own thing (memes? leading by example), I talked about the simplification of the message. Which an "image" would also do.

Instead of attempting to explain 10-100 things, focus on one thing and casually say it. Something simple but impactful.
Toast message