Very good article OP, this is absolutely true and well known. If you read Mein Kampf you can tell that Hitler understood this very well.
The main reason one becomes a National Socialist is that the "nazis" look fucking awesome. Both from historical images and from fiction, the power of their image is unrivalled. Basically everyone on the planet knows the swastika. Hell, there's even a mustache style which is inextricably linked to Hitler.
To recruit people, especially young White men, you need to show the NatSoc as the cool ones. You need to show them [this video of the SS](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RHGgvMEWlw). Not Europa which is 10 hours long of whining and complaining about the evil Jews.
The political and philosophical understanding comes only AFTER someone is convinced at an emotional level by the images - the "brand", to refer to the article.
Maybe I was just a weird kid, but when I watched Star Wars (the original trilogy) I instinctively was on the side of the Empire. I was supposed to cheer for the "rebellion", but on one hand you had a screeching monkey with a gay robot and a walking metal dildo, on the other side you had a badass cyborg who could choke people through a screen, cool spaceships, and raw power and resources.
The moment we sell the image of a White Supremacist as an alpha chad, and not a incel loser, that's when we win.
I remember that I had sympathy for the National Socialists long before I understood the ideology. Just because they looked cool in movies and didn't have niggers in their ranks.
For entry-levels, boiling it down to something like "the jews did this too", "thank the jews for this" would work better.
Tackling the holocaust is probably bit too much. It's the very thing that holds loyalty of the normie to jews and "mild" diversity in the first place. It's like nagging on the foundations of their beliefs. Once they realize what the jew is and always has been, it will automatically fall apart later on.
I think the most important thing is to bring attention to jewish involvement in all the things they complain about. "Mainstream media"? That's synonymous with the "jewish media."
"It doesn't matter who wins the vote, the jews control all of US politics, so they decide what will happen. And if Trump wins, they will be more timid in their pursuit of faggotry for 4 years."
Things like this are short and catchy. Not about arguing about details and throwing around evidence. If they try to play smart and try to play to the imaginary crowd in an attempt to make you look stupid, ignorant, bigoted, tell them "6 corporations own 96% of US media, which is known as the 'mainstream media', and they are owned by jews."
"So what?!" - "Well, what would you say if the entirety of television and radio is owned by Cuba and running it as they see fit? Or Russia, or North Korea, or China. Sure that would bother you, right? Well, in this case it's jews. And they haven't been kicked 1030+ times out of 109+ countries over 2 millennia for no reason. Maybe YOU have forgotten, but they didn't."
And who said I am supposed to regurgitate the article mindlessly 1:1? What revelations did you draw from the article?
Clearly it is irrelevant what you are as a person when you engage in anonymous conversations online, so the article has zero effect on that. Leading by example only works locally with people you interact with. And doing advertisements isn't going to work anyway.
The point is this: Simplify your points as to make it more accessible to normies with short attention spans. The media thing? 1 sentence. If they catch on, you can dig deeper. This also works locally.
This is the closest the article comes as to something applicable. The cigarette example is to be understood analogously.
You started your previous comment with "It's interesting and probably true" and then proceeded to say the exact opposite of the article, I found it strange.
In any case, even online you can communicate a certain image. That's what meme warfare is, and it is very effective.
This forum does a good job at presenting the National Socialists in a good light. Just look at our banner. So badass.
> and then proceeded to say the exact opposite of the article
It wasn't the opposite, it was actually quite related to it. The core point of the article was to simplify the message, to create an image instead of trying to convince.
While creating an image is it's own thing (memes? leading by example), I talked about the simplification of the message. Which an "image" would also do.
Instead of attempting to explain 10-100 things, focus on one thing and casually say it. Something simple but impactful.
The main reason one becomes a National Socialist is that the "nazis" look fucking awesome. Both from historical images and from fiction, the power of their image is unrivalled. Basically everyone on the planet knows the swastika. Hell, there's even a mustache style which is inextricably linked to Hitler.
To recruit people, especially young White men, you need to show the NatSoc as the cool ones. You need to show them [this video of the SS](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RHGgvMEWlw). Not Europa which is 10 hours long of whining and complaining about the evil Jews.
The political and philosophical understanding comes only AFTER someone is convinced at an emotional level by the images - the "brand", to refer to the article.
Maybe I was just a weird kid, but when I watched Star Wars (the original trilogy) I instinctively was on the side of the Empire. I was supposed to cheer for the "rebellion", but on one hand you had a screeching monkey with a gay robot and a walking metal dildo, on the other side you had a badass cyborg who could choke people through a screen, cool spaceships, and raw power and resources.
The moment we sell the image of a White Supremacist as an alpha chad, and not a incel loser, that's when we win.
I remember that I had sympathy for the National Socialists long before I understood the ideology. Just because they looked cool in movies and didn't have niggers in their ranks.