And who said I am supposed to regurgitate the article mindlessly 1:1? What revelations did you draw from the article?
Clearly it is irrelevant what you are as a person when you engage in anonymous conversations online, so the article has zero effect on that. Leading by example only works locally with people you interact with. And doing advertisements isn't going to work anyway.
The point is this: Simplify your points as to make it more accessible to normies with short attention spans. The media thing? 1 sentence. If they catch on, you can dig deeper. This also works locally.
This is the closest the article comes as to something applicable. The cigarette example is to be understood analogously.
You started your previous comment with "It's interesting and probably true" and then proceeded to say the exact opposite of the article, I found it strange.
In any case, even online you can communicate a certain image. That's what meme warfare is, and it is very effective.
This forum does a good job at presenting the National Socialists in a good light. Just look at our banner. So badass.
> and then proceeded to say the exact opposite of the article
It wasn't the opposite, it was actually quite related to it. The core point of the article was to simplify the message, to create an image instead of trying to convince.
While creating an image is it's own thing (memes? leading by example), I talked about the simplification of the message. Which an "image" would also do.
Instead of attempting to explain 10-100 things, focus on one thing and casually say it. Something simple but impactful.
Clearly it is irrelevant what you are as a person when you engage in anonymous conversations online, so the article has zero effect on that. Leading by example only works locally with people you interact with. And doing advertisements isn't going to work anyway.
The point is this: Simplify your points as to make it more accessible to normies with short attention spans. The media thing? 1 sentence. If they catch on, you can dig deeper. This also works locally.
This is the closest the article comes as to something applicable. The cigarette example is to be understood analogously.
In any case, even online you can communicate a certain image. That's what meme warfare is, and it is very effective.
This forum does a good job at presenting the National Socialists in a good light. Just look at our banner. So badass.
It wasn't the opposite, it was actually quite related to it. The core point of the article was to simplify the message, to create an image instead of trying to convince.
While creating an image is it's own thing (memes? leading by example), I talked about the simplification of the message. Which an "image" would also do.
Instead of attempting to explain 10-100 things, focus on one thing and casually say it. Something simple but impactful.