You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
18
fourleaved on scored.co
1 year ago18 points(+0/-0/+18Score on mirror)2 children
Democracy has only existed on small scales in homogeneous groups. An elite, organised minority has always and will always be in control. Jews hide behind the liberal delusion to disguise their subversion as "the will of the masses." It's not a choice between free, open, tolerant, liberal democracy and authoritarian oligarchy. It's a choice between gay judeo-communist oligarchy, and righteous White oligarchy
FDR was the president who changed the US republic to a democracy at the same time creating new government departments to be staffed by all of his jewish buddies.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
The problem is that Democracy attracts vile ideologies like equality and the intent to treat every human and non-human "equally" in all regards. If Democracy would be limited to all native men who own property (or some other criteria), at least it would be something.
But no, the nigger hobo and the family man of 3 have the same "voting rights", therefore politicians can appeal to idiots and it works well.
That still assumes that the best person to lead, the spirit of the race embodied in a singular man, would be the same as the collectively nominated candidate
Well, it happened once in Germany, but in general you are right. But not picking the *best* doesn't mean it's bad. A 9/10 is great, but a 8/10 will do too. The problem is when some 0/10 faggot is voted and a 2/10 retard is considered heckin' awesome because the bar is so low.
As a means to an end, I can see democracy finding the best option, like happened once before in Germany. But even the Germans had the sense to shut down the democratic process once this right man was found, because his judgment will always be clearer in picking a successor than the vote of the masses
But no, the nigger hobo and the family man of 3 have the same "voting rights", therefore politicians can appeal to idiots and it works well.