So much for the democratic process:
(media.scored.co)
It's one big jewish oligarchy. It's not a democracy, maybe never has been
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
43 comments:
I heard somebody else mention the oligarchy when they were asked why the Democrats don't just get a competent leader instead of Biden or Harris who "could get things done."
Democracy has only existed on small scales in homogeneous groups. An elite, organised minority has always and will always be in control. Jews hide behind the liberal delusion to disguise their subversion as "the will of the masses." It's not a choice between free, open, tolerant, liberal democracy and authoritarian oligarchy. It's a choice between gay judeo-communist oligarchy, and righteous White oligarchy
FDR was the president who changed the US republic to a democracy at the same time creating new government departments to be staffed by all of his jewish buddies.
The problem is that Democracy attracts vile ideologies like equality and the intent to treat every human and non-human "equally" in all regards. If Democracy would be limited to all native men who own property (or some other criteria), at least it would be something.
But no, the nigger hobo and the family man of 3 have the same "voting rights", therefore politicians can appeal to idiots and it works well.
But no, the nigger hobo and the family man of 3 have the same "voting rights", therefore politicians can appeal to idiots and it works well.
That still assumes that the best person to lead, the spirit of the race embodied in a singular man, would be the same as the collectively nominated candidate
You don't "win" and ask for permission to run shit.
They should just muscle those dumb cunts out of the way, put their belongings in a cardboard box on the sidewalk outside then change the locks.
It's a parliamentary system, no particular benefit in winning. You'll have just as much mandates in opposition, but none of the blame. Being a strong opposition party can be very beneficial in parliaments.
They have 37% of the vote and every other parties have stated they won't enter in a coalition with them. It would be a bit of a waste of time, but let them fail.
With 5-10 parties, 37% is a lot. Enough to make them the biggest party with the most seats. Which means they have a lot of influence, even if they're not in government. They can work with whoever they want, they never have to compromise just to form a block and they won't get blamed when something goes wrong because everything is always the fault of the current government.
Parliamentary systems are great in this way.
Parliamentary systems are great in this way.
The Austrian president Van der Bellen comes from the Green Party - green on the outside, red on the inside. He was first elected in 2016. Two thirds of female votes went to him, while two thirds of male votes went to the far right candidate.
Females should not be given the privilege of voting.
They've been doing this for decades in europe
https://files.catbox.moe/2jb1f8.png
https://files.catbox.moe/2jb1f8.png
Good, let the System expose itself, the only way things will change is if the System is changed for one that isnt run by judeo-satanists.
Toast message
Because of this, the Freedom Party will be in opposition, but still have plenty of seats. They can stop any government fuckery they want, they can pass new laws, and work with everyone to achieve majority, no need to compromise. And nobody can blame them for anything because they're in opposition.
Electoral systems are the real fuckery, were it's all about winning, and you basically only have red jew vs blue jew because nobody else ever has a chance to reach majority. You want the small parties to rule, because they are the based ones, in most cases. There are shitty small parties too.