1 year ago14 points(+0/-0/+14Score on mirror)1 child
Pretty sure greeks and romans didnt own all that many nog slaves, it was almost exclusively muzzies and jews.
Blacks actually can blame slavery in part for their current stagnation, just not in the way they think. Centuries of coddling and having food and housing provided for them in exchange for menial labor that requires zero thought have clearly had a deleterious effect on their ability to function on their own, reparations in the form of repatriation and then completely ignoring them in hopes that they get themselves sorted out is the only solution to the negro question.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
This can be observed after thew "end of slavery" too, in cities like Detroit and Chicago. Plenty of niggers moved there to work in factories, doing menial labor, almost the same principle as the slavery. And those were the booming days of those cities, niggers were kept busy and wouldn't commit as much crime as they do today.
Then came the machines, and suddenly all niggers were unemployed practically overnight. They're useless eaters now.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
And that's one of my main points about the outcome of the Civil War
Okay, *de jure* slavery ended. It was no longer legal to own niggers or anyone else as slaves, but *de facto* slavery was booming, and de facto slavery was even worse.
So they left the farms and ended up in early industrial factories which were already enslaving the white people, with company housing that was absolute squalor, getting nowhere near enough pay to advance their life standards or survive on any food except what the company gave them. Sounds like slavery to me, but it technically has a paycheck so it's all good.
Except here's the difference: the factory owner doesn't give a singular flying fuck about your wellbeing because there is a line of people waiting out the door for employment. The slave owner cares because the slave owner has to care, it's an expensive generational investment to keep a chattel slave. You can't just let the slave die or be physically unhealthy. It's not an expensive investment to have one wage slave die when there's a million others who are unemployed, and you get to use their 10 children as laborers too.
That's also not getting into sharecropping which had similar issues and which also affected negroes and whites in the rural south. My family were sharecroppers and it was a literal hell on earth. The other side of my family were industrial laborers in Pittsburgh. Sharecropping doesn't get enough credit for how miserable it actually was, it was effectively serfdom but worse, and it was spread very widely by carpetbaggers (see: kikes) after the Civil War. Furthermore, even those that know what sharecropping actually was only presume it was recently freed niggers who did it. It was mostly poor white farmers that had their land repossessed by the federal government after the Civil War (that's what happened to my family).
So you get every issue that everyone already knows about with early industrial age factories, except these 2 points never correlate in anyone's fucking brains so to the mind of the normie "SLAVERY ENDED YIPEE".
And then Theodore Roosevelt made laws and shit that forced companies to actually give a damn, and Henry Ford set a precedent that proved that living wages would keep workers. That's all fine and dandy until circa the 1980s and 90s when jobs start going overseas and now they can legally, de jure, enslave jeets, beaners, and bug people once again, the quality of the products suffer because it's sweatshop labor in third world countries and its being produced under similar conditions to the early industrial age. So slavery is at its high point, "but it ended in 1865" my ass.
The funny thing, it didnt. Its actually *enshrined* in the US constitution that the State has the exclusive *right* to enslave anyone for any reason, so long as they can claim they committed a crime. When leftists screech about the prison industrial complex being modern day slavery, they actually arent wrong; theyre just wrong claiming its whites and "capitalism" perpetuating it when its the same old corporatocratic jews and their shabbos underlings who were responsible for the original slavery. The greatest lie perpetuated by the US federal government is that it is some champion of freedom and equality, when in reality its probably the second largest slave-owner in the world, after Communist China.
If you figure American corporations also, the US exceeds the number of slaves owned by China by an absolute magnitude. And the government is complicit because the government doesn't give a fuck
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
Another obvious kike/shabbos goy social media account.
1)Scapegoats whites for slave trades which were dominated by Muslims and kikes. A white person would mention the Barbary and Crimean slave trades.
2) Attacks Christianity non stop.
3) Leaves out the part where Germans and the Celts were treated like absolute shit by Rome. The idea that only blacks were slaves is laughable and Muslims are who had the large amount of black slaves until kikes dominated the African slave trade later.
4) Is there to antagonize blacks and turn them against whites.
The one thing they don't want you knowing. Hitler treated Jesse Owens better than the United States per Jesse Owens. Hitler didn't own slaves and the only reason he made kikes work is cus they couldn't be trusted to fight and German men were at war. The Axis powers were (their stupid term) more "diverse" than the "Allies" because stopping jews was more important and it's a global problem. The entire world has been jewed.
We are all financial slaves to kike banks and they use the economy they purposely fuck over to set us against each other and have since the days a "court jew" sat down with our European nobility.
I would stand with a black who knows kikes are the problem then a mentally enslaved fellow white who supports Israel any day and who would rat me out to a kike trying to get me fired at a job. Blacks are the only people who can call them out at the moment and I smile every time I see them do it. They have as much reason to hate them as I do.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)3 children
Hellenist is a half nigger half spic BTW he was doxxed (remember seeing this while browsing Varg's Twitter lmao)
https://i.poastcdn.org/46b101e9ee7a85f5c159b6e04077c6180d1154ca05d58e238e093f96e7077252.png
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)2 children
And that "Latino" part is probably actually jewish. Over 90 percent of the slave trade went to the Caribbean and South America and DNA tests show the Conquistadors were mostly jewish who all fled Spain in 1492 because they finally kicked them out.
So he's a fag, who pushes pagan religion, attacks Christianity, whose ancestors shipped and enslaved his black ancestors who he tried to turn against Christians and whites by antagonizing them.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
It is when its anti-Christian Judeo-Paganism. The jews are actually Pagans of the worst sort themselves, since they *knowingly* worship devils instead of doing it out of ignorance. They have deliberately brought back the old forms of paganism in a corrupted form solely for the purpose of attacking Christianity.
OUR Paganism is good, the religions of our ancestors, What’s not good is jewish Baal worship or the rest, though that’s bad because it’s jewish, not because it’s Pagan persay.
The issue is that Norse Paganism has been dead for centuries, everything known about it comes from Christians, and what they did record seems to indicate that Norse Paganism was anticipating Christianity (especially the Ragnarok account in the Prose Edda, which has almost blatantly Christian themes).
You know the conquistadores didn't all suddenly sail West when Ferdinand and Isabella declared Iberia a no kike zone, right? It took Columbus a year to come back and the waves of conquistadores were a fair bit later. Cortes went out and stopped the human sacrifices in 1519 and Pizarro dealt with the Incan heathens in 1531.
This is true. Just like how not every english colonist came during Jamestown.
There were Spaniards that came with Columbus, there were Spaniards that came during the 1500s, Spaniards that came in the 1600s, 1700s, 1800s, and even a few that came after spain lost everything in South America.
I do not buy that jews ever made up a majority or even a large minority of conquistadors or colonists. Mostly because jews cannot labor or fight for anything at all, except israel which was guaranteed to them and built on the back of British labor. Most of the jews after 1492 probably fled to other European countries (namely France, HRE, Italy, and England), the muslim world, and or became slave drivers
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
I think he exists purely to give pagans a bad name
his takes are pajeet tier ([small penis was considered a sign of high intelligence in ancient greece! clearly having a tiny pecker is a sign of superiority!](https://i.redd.it/dsctnrcx764a1.jpg))
like unironically [saying having tiny tits or small dick is aristocratic](https://twitter.com/The_Hellenist/status/1747438593445134453) i genuinely doubt the ancient greeks (which were alpha males unlike the fatsos of today) had small penises
i dunno if he's a bean mongrel or a pajeet, but he's certainly ain't White.
Blacks actually can blame slavery in part for their current stagnation, just not in the way they think. Centuries of coddling and having food and housing provided for them in exchange for menial labor that requires zero thought have clearly had a deleterious effect on their ability to function on their own, reparations in the form of repatriation and then completely ignoring them in hopes that they get themselves sorted out is the only solution to the negro question.
Then came the machines, and suddenly all niggers were unemployed practically overnight. They're useless eaters now.
Okay, *de jure* slavery ended. It was no longer legal to own niggers or anyone else as slaves, but *de facto* slavery was booming, and de facto slavery was even worse.
So they left the farms and ended up in early industrial factories which were already enslaving the white people, with company housing that was absolute squalor, getting nowhere near enough pay to advance their life standards or survive on any food except what the company gave them. Sounds like slavery to me, but it technically has a paycheck so it's all good.
Except here's the difference: the factory owner doesn't give a singular flying fuck about your wellbeing because there is a line of people waiting out the door for employment. The slave owner cares because the slave owner has to care, it's an expensive generational investment to keep a chattel slave. You can't just let the slave die or be physically unhealthy. It's not an expensive investment to have one wage slave die when there's a million others who are unemployed, and you get to use their 10 children as laborers too.
That's also not getting into sharecropping which had similar issues and which also affected negroes and whites in the rural south. My family were sharecroppers and it was a literal hell on earth. The other side of my family were industrial laborers in Pittsburgh. Sharecropping doesn't get enough credit for how miserable it actually was, it was effectively serfdom but worse, and it was spread very widely by carpetbaggers (see: kikes) after the Civil War. Furthermore, even those that know what sharecropping actually was only presume it was recently freed niggers who did it. It was mostly poor white farmers that had their land repossessed by the federal government after the Civil War (that's what happened to my family).
So you get every issue that everyone already knows about with early industrial age factories, except these 2 points never correlate in anyone's fucking brains so to the mind of the normie "SLAVERY ENDED YIPEE".
And then Theodore Roosevelt made laws and shit that forced companies to actually give a damn, and Henry Ford set a precedent that proved that living wages would keep workers. That's all fine and dandy until circa the 1980s and 90s when jobs start going overseas and now they can legally, de jure, enslave jeets, beaners, and bug people once again, the quality of the products suffer because it's sweatshop labor in third world countries and its being produced under similar conditions to the early industrial age. So slavery is at its high point, "but it ended in 1865" my ass.
The funny thing, it didnt. Its actually *enshrined* in the US constitution that the State has the exclusive *right* to enslave anyone for any reason, so long as they can claim they committed a crime. When leftists screech about the prison industrial complex being modern day slavery, they actually arent wrong; theyre just wrong claiming its whites and "capitalism" perpetuating it when its the same old corporatocratic jews and their shabbos underlings who were responsible for the original slavery. The greatest lie perpetuated by the US federal government is that it is some champion of freedom and equality, when in reality its probably the second largest slave-owner in the world, after Communist China.