You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
4
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
This can be observed after thew "end of slavery" too, in cities like Detroit and Chicago. Plenty of niggers moved there to work in factories, doing menial labor, almost the same principle as the slavery. And those were the booming days of those cities, niggers were kept busy and wouldn't commit as much crime as they do today.
Then came the machines, and suddenly all niggers were unemployed practically overnight. They're useless eaters now.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
And that's one of my main points about the outcome of the Civil War
Okay, *de jure* slavery ended. It was no longer legal to own niggers or anyone else as slaves, but *de facto* slavery was booming, and de facto slavery was even worse.
So they left the farms and ended up in early industrial factories which were already enslaving the white people, with company housing that was absolute squalor, getting nowhere near enough pay to advance their life standards or survive on any food except what the company gave them. Sounds like slavery to me, but it technically has a paycheck so it's all good.
Except here's the difference: the factory owner doesn't give a singular flying fuck about your wellbeing because there is a line of people waiting out the door for employment. The slave owner cares because the slave owner has to care, it's an expensive generational investment to keep a chattel slave. You can't just let the slave die or be physically unhealthy. It's not an expensive investment to have one wage slave die when there's a million others who are unemployed, and you get to use their 10 children as laborers too.
That's also not getting into sharecropping which had similar issues and which also affected negroes and whites in the rural south. My family were sharecroppers and it was a literal hell on earth. The other side of my family were industrial laborers in Pittsburgh. Sharecropping doesn't get enough credit for how miserable it actually was, it was effectively serfdom but worse, and it was spread very widely by carpetbaggers (see: kikes) after the Civil War. Furthermore, even those that know what sharecropping actually was only presume it was recently freed niggers who did it. It was mostly poor white farmers that had their land repossessed by the federal government after the Civil War (that's what happened to my family).
So you get every issue that everyone already knows about with early industrial age factories, except these 2 points never correlate in anyone's fucking brains so to the mind of the normie "SLAVERY ENDED YIPEE".
And then Theodore Roosevelt made laws and shit that forced companies to actually give a damn, and Henry Ford set a precedent that proved that living wages would keep workers. That's all fine and dandy until circa the 1980s and 90s when jobs start going overseas and now they can legally, de jure, enslave jeets, beaners, and bug people once again, the quality of the products suffer because it's sweatshop labor in third world countries and its being produced under similar conditions to the early industrial age. So slavery is at its high point, "but it ended in 1865" my ass.
The funny thing, it didnt. Its actually *enshrined* in the US constitution that the State has the exclusive *right* to enslave anyone for any reason, so long as they can claim they committed a crime. When leftists screech about the prison industrial complex being modern day slavery, they actually arent wrong; theyre just wrong claiming its whites and "capitalism" perpetuating it when its the same old corporatocratic jews and their shabbos underlings who were responsible for the original slavery. The greatest lie perpetuated by the US federal government is that it is some champion of freedom and equality, when in reality its probably the second largest slave-owner in the world, after Communist China.
If you figure American corporations also, the US exceeds the number of slaves owned by China by an absolute magnitude. And the government is complicit because the government doesn't give a fuck
Then came the machines, and suddenly all niggers were unemployed practically overnight. They're useless eaters now.
Okay, *de jure* slavery ended. It was no longer legal to own niggers or anyone else as slaves, but *de facto* slavery was booming, and de facto slavery was even worse.
So they left the farms and ended up in early industrial factories which were already enslaving the white people, with company housing that was absolute squalor, getting nowhere near enough pay to advance their life standards or survive on any food except what the company gave them. Sounds like slavery to me, but it technically has a paycheck so it's all good.
Except here's the difference: the factory owner doesn't give a singular flying fuck about your wellbeing because there is a line of people waiting out the door for employment. The slave owner cares because the slave owner has to care, it's an expensive generational investment to keep a chattel slave. You can't just let the slave die or be physically unhealthy. It's not an expensive investment to have one wage slave die when there's a million others who are unemployed, and you get to use their 10 children as laborers too.
That's also not getting into sharecropping which had similar issues and which also affected negroes and whites in the rural south. My family were sharecroppers and it was a literal hell on earth. The other side of my family were industrial laborers in Pittsburgh. Sharecropping doesn't get enough credit for how miserable it actually was, it was effectively serfdom but worse, and it was spread very widely by carpetbaggers (see: kikes) after the Civil War. Furthermore, even those that know what sharecropping actually was only presume it was recently freed niggers who did it. It was mostly poor white farmers that had their land repossessed by the federal government after the Civil War (that's what happened to my family).
So you get every issue that everyone already knows about with early industrial age factories, except these 2 points never correlate in anyone's fucking brains so to the mind of the normie "SLAVERY ENDED YIPEE".
And then Theodore Roosevelt made laws and shit that forced companies to actually give a damn, and Henry Ford set a precedent that proved that living wages would keep workers. That's all fine and dandy until circa the 1980s and 90s when jobs start going overseas and now they can legally, de jure, enslave jeets, beaners, and bug people once again, the quality of the products suffer because it's sweatshop labor in third world countries and its being produced under similar conditions to the early industrial age. So slavery is at its high point, "but it ended in 1865" my ass.
The funny thing, it didnt. Its actually *enshrined* in the US constitution that the State has the exclusive *right* to enslave anyone for any reason, so long as they can claim they committed a crime. When leftists screech about the prison industrial complex being modern day slavery, they actually arent wrong; theyre just wrong claiming its whites and "capitalism" perpetuating it when its the same old corporatocratic jews and their shabbos underlings who were responsible for the original slavery. The greatest lie perpetuated by the US federal government is that it is some champion of freedom and equality, when in reality its probably the second largest slave-owner in the world, after Communist China.