New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
45
posted 1 year ago by Karaiman on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +45Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
21 comments:
21
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 21 points (+0 / -0 / +21Score on mirror ) 3 children
I've lost the count over how many arguments have ended with "but that's a slippery slope" followed by no further discussion. Yes, they just named the phenomena but my theory was still right in the end. Then these freaks have the guts to come asking for help. What else can I say than "told you so" with a smug face.

u/#smugler
12
Karaiman on scored.co
1 year ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror ) 1 child
>hey if we all take cocaine and give it to everybody, society will collapse.

>omg that's a straw man fallacy.

These people don't even understand the concept of consequence. LMAO. No shit A->B...->Z. if that's your direction that's where you will end up.

it's literally a satanic idea: a bit of evil won't make you lose your soul, just do this little evil, just have anal sex once.. just watch porn once (ask any coomer), just take cocaine once.. all these lead to Z. it's basic understanding. the fallacy is a fallacy.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
It's been deprogrammed, It's the same part of the brain that process threat identification. To identify a threat, the ability to identify consequences is an absolute necessity.

"That bridge look unstable, I better not cross it", this could have two outcomes obviously, either you cross safely, or it collapse, but the smart thnig to do is to not cross it because of the risk. A shabbos goy libtard on the other hand would rush right out without thinking.

They would ramble something about you being "RACIST and ANIT-SEMmiiiittttttiiiiicccccc" as the bridge collapse and they fall down. 🤡🌎
Crockett on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror ) 2 children
You know, for a supposed fallacy, "Slippery Slope" is a funny one because even the metaphor doesn't actually present any absurdity.

If you "attack a straw man" then you're attacking a target that isn't real. That makes sense as a way to convey the problem with an argument.

But for "Slippery Slope"... Some slopes are just slippery. That's a genuine risk in certain circumstances. There's no absurdity there, metaphorical or otherwise, to make the concern fallacious.
ChippingToe on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
Ikr? I used to read about "slippery slope" (without the "fallacy" part) and always thought it was used in the opposite sense. It's a great way to describe things of that nature. Like an icy slope where there's a point of no return because beyond it you can't get enough traction to climb back up.

It's a great analogy to succinctly convey danger and beckon reconsideration of the current behaviour. It's the first step to connecting the dots. It's no wonder leftists fags labelled it a thought crime lol.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Passenger: It's pretty icy, you should be careful.

Bus driver: That's just the slippery slope fallacy.
BlippiIsAPedo on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror )
> But bro, when the traffic light goes from Green to Yellow it will turn Red soon.

> Nah man, that is slippery slope theory. No way.
15
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 15 points (+0 / -0 / +15Score on mirror ) 3 children
A certain group intends to do A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, etc. They've already done A, B, C, D and seek to do E. It is not hard to realize that after they've done E, the next is F. Then G. Then H. Things that increase in magnitude of degeneracy step by step.

The "slippery slope" fallacy was always a lie. It was always about "progression." They even call themselves "progressives." It is so obvious.
Karaiman on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
Yeah and they lie. They literally say "we only want to go to B it's not a big deal" and then once they got there they say "we only want to go to C just relax, we don't want Z lmao".. and do it like this until they get to Z.
That's what totalitarian govs do. David Icke called it "totalitarian tiptoe".
Only a bit of power and only a bit of power and only no guns and only no hate speech and tadaa you're a slave..
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
It's just a matter of "We want to allow A" but the rules they want to change would also allow B, C, D, etc.

Marriage is specifically defined as between a man and woman for the purpose of setting children up with the best environment in which to grow. Saying gays can marry doesn't serve this purpose, so why are we allowing it? So gay people can feel normal? Well, that allows dog fuckers and pedo pajeets to get married under the same justification.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
There is no point to debate how marriage is between a man and a woman while faggot relationships are all about assaulting each other's assholes and committing sodomy on insane levels. I mean orgies. Faggots do orgies. Piss orgies.

It's all about degeneracy and hedonism for faggots.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
But you’re not allowed to recognize, and acknowledge the patterns goy.
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
Slippery Slope can be fallacious but only when it's used in a manner that typically starts with Step 1 and only Step 1, with no prior historical or logical basis otherwise. An example is "Putin will invade Europe and conquer Poland!"

A) there's no historical reason to believe that nor any indication at all from Russia that fits at all in their objectives,

B) there's no logical reason since Poland is part of NATO and Russia's dumpy military can barely handle Ukraine.
FN57 on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
The problem here is that the slippery slope logical fallacy is true: just because A happens that is not enough to PROVE a more extreme version of A MUST occur.

But it might. Give any child, like a 6 year old boy, "just 20 more minutes" before bed, and I'm confident he will ask for another "just 20 more". It's not guaranteed, it's not logically provable, it just probably is going to happen.

Faggots need to go back in the closet. It needs to be looked at as a bad thing once again.
Karaiman on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Yeha not all but for what they argue, it's common sense that it will.
Look at the LGBTQ slippery slope.. now they're after kids.. even trying to normalize paedophilia.
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
>even monkeys

literally happened, see Nigger-marriage
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
TBF that’s a stock image on fallacies and probably the best one available sadly, it’s pozzed but does explain them somewhat well.
Karaiman on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
https://imgur.com/a/YEw6qQu - how many of them can you debunk?
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Well considering how that premise has been proven true.
Formerlurker92 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The slippery slope is a fallacy, but it is also a strategy

Figuring which is happening is usually important
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
They’ve been allowing monkeys to marry forever. I also find it abhorrent that they call it the slippery slope. It’s not the slopes causing the problem. It’s the kikes. I hereby rename it the slimy kike. 😁
Toast message