You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
21
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago21 points(+0/-0/+21Score on mirror)3 children
I've lost the count over how many arguments have ended with "but that's a slippery slope" followed by no further discussion. Yes, they just named the phenomena but my theory was still right in the end. Then these freaks have the guts to come asking for help. What else can I say than "told you so" with a smug face.
1 year ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)1 child
>hey if we all take cocaine and give it to everybody, society will collapse.
>omg that's a straw man fallacy.
These people don't even understand the concept of consequence. LMAO. No shit A->B...->Z. if that's your direction that's where you will end up.
it's literally a satanic idea: a bit of evil won't make you lose your soul, just do this little evil, just have anal sex once.. just watch porn once (ask any coomer), just take cocaine once.. all these lead to Z. it's basic understanding. the fallacy is a fallacy.
It's been deprogrammed, It's the same part of the brain that process threat identification. To identify a threat, the ability to identify consequences is an absolute necessity.
"That bridge look unstable, I better not cross it", this could have two outcomes obviously, either you cross safely, or it collapse, but the smart thnig to do is to not cross it because of the risk. A shabbos goy libtard on the other hand would rush right out without thinking.
They would ramble something about you being "RACIST and ANIT-SEMmiiiittttttiiiiicccccc" as the bridge collapse and they fall down. 🤡🌎
1 year ago8 points(+0/-0/+8Score on mirror)2 children
You know, for a supposed fallacy, "Slippery Slope" is a funny one because even the metaphor doesn't actually present any absurdity.
If you "attack a straw man" then you're attacking a target that isn't real. That makes sense as a way to convey the problem with an argument.
But for "Slippery Slope"... Some slopes are just slippery. That's a genuine risk in certain circumstances. There's no absurdity there, metaphorical or otherwise, to make the concern fallacious.
Ikr? I used to read about "slippery slope" (without the "fallacy" part) and always thought it was used in the opposite sense. It's a great way to describe things of that nature. Like an icy slope where there's a point of no return because beyond it you can't get enough traction to climb back up.
It's a great analogy to succinctly convey danger and beckon reconsideration of the current behaviour. It's the first step to connecting the dots. It's no wonder leftists fags labelled it a thought crime lol.
u/#smugler
>omg that's a straw man fallacy.
These people don't even understand the concept of consequence. LMAO. No shit A->B...->Z. if that's your direction that's where you will end up.
it's literally a satanic idea: a bit of evil won't make you lose your soul, just do this little evil, just have anal sex once.. just watch porn once (ask any coomer), just take cocaine once.. all these lead to Z. it's basic understanding. the fallacy is a fallacy.
"That bridge look unstable, I better not cross it", this could have two outcomes obviously, either you cross safely, or it collapse, but the smart thnig to do is to not cross it because of the risk. A shabbos goy libtard on the other hand would rush right out without thinking.
They would ramble something about you being "RACIST and ANIT-SEMmiiiittttttiiiiicccccc" as the bridge collapse and they fall down. 🤡🌎
If you "attack a straw man" then you're attacking a target that isn't real. That makes sense as a way to convey the problem with an argument.
But for "Slippery Slope"... Some slopes are just slippery. That's a genuine risk in certain circumstances. There's no absurdity there, metaphorical or otherwise, to make the concern fallacious.
It's a great analogy to succinctly convey danger and beckon reconsideration of the current behaviour. It's the first step to connecting the dots. It's no wonder leftists fags labelled it a thought crime lol.
Bus driver: That's just the slippery slope fallacy.
> Nah man, that is slippery slope theory. No way.