You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
4
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
Funny how its consistent throughout all of history, too. Luther was a hack though, he's indirectly the reason why the jews were able to take over Europe, as the initial wave of Protestantism was rabidly Philo-Semitic (and remains so to this day, because Luther and the other Protestants were under the delusional idea that the modern self-proclaimed jews are the legitimate heirs to Israel, when the Church has always taught they're Schismatic Reprobates who have no valid claim to being the Sons of Abraham)
1 year ago19 points(+0/-0/+19Score on mirror)2 children
The author of "On the Jews and their Lies" who said "better a Jew have a millstone tied round his neck and tossed into a river" was "rabidly Philo-Semitic"?
Before he got jewpilled by his own mistake, *yes*.
He literally removed entire books that werent in the (((masoretic text))) from his "canon" in an attempt to pander to the jews and other philo-semites. Of course, it failed miserably, because the Synagogue of Satan had no intention of converting, and this is probably what jewpilled him. Just because someone becomes jewpilled later in life (and in Luther's case, it was *far too late*) doesnt mean they were earlier in life. In fact, Hitler himself admits he was a normie-con up until the war who had no issue with the jews at all and didn't really make the connection until he ended up in the city and was surrounded by (((bolshevism))).
It was more like the groundwork he laid was led to the most rabidly philiosemitic "christian" theology we see today. But I think it's a bit excessive to say that Luther was the *sole* reason jewry was able to take over Europe. Their leverage over the financial institutions was the *sole* reason they were able to pull that off.
1 year ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)2 children
Luther is the perfect lightning rod for all the anti-Protestant hate because for the most part, he was right. If the RCC didn't suck so much, there wouldn't have been a need for the reformation.
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
Except the Church has had bad men in it since the start, and no amount of Reformation will change Human Nature. As long as the Church is made of Men, it will have some bad Men in it, but those few bad Men arent the reason to toss out the whole institutions. Luther was a bright man, I'll give him that, but he was also ignorant of some things that a man in his position *should have knows*, and that ignorance doomed Protestantism to being the tool of the jew.
That would be all well and good, but the bishop of Rome is a patent heretic today. And Luther’s contemporary pope commissioned the Bomberg talmud. If the men can not be held to account, the institution can never supersede them
He literally removed entire books that werent in the (((masoretic text))) from his "canon" in an attempt to pander to the jews and other philo-semites. Of course, it failed miserably, because the Synagogue of Satan had no intention of converting, and this is probably what jewpilled him. Just because someone becomes jewpilled later in life (and in Luther's case, it was *far too late*) doesnt mean they were earlier in life. In fact, Hitler himself admits he was a normie-con up until the war who had no issue with the jews at all and didn't really make the connection until he ended up in the city and was surrounded by (((bolshevism))).
Everyone should know what is in that book.