You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
19
diogenesOTarch on scored.co
1 year ago19 points(+0/-0/+19Score on mirror)2 children
The author of "On the Jews and their Lies" who said "better a Jew have a millstone tied round his neck and tossed into a river" was "rabidly Philo-Semitic"?
Before he got jewpilled by his own mistake, *yes*.
He literally removed entire books that werent in the (((masoretic text))) from his "canon" in an attempt to pander to the jews and other philo-semites. Of course, it failed miserably, because the Synagogue of Satan had no intention of converting, and this is probably what jewpilled him. Just because someone becomes jewpilled later in life (and in Luther's case, it was *far too late*) doesnt mean they were earlier in life. In fact, Hitler himself admits he was a normie-con up until the war who had no issue with the jews at all and didn't really make the connection until he ended up in the city and was surrounded by (((bolshevism))).
It was more like the groundwork he laid was led to the most rabidly philiosemitic "christian" theology we see today. But I think it's a bit excessive to say that Luther was the *sole* reason jewry was able to take over Europe. Their leverage over the financial institutions was the *sole* reason they were able to pull that off.
He literally removed entire books that werent in the (((masoretic text))) from his "canon" in an attempt to pander to the jews and other philo-semites. Of course, it failed miserably, because the Synagogue of Satan had no intention of converting, and this is probably what jewpilled him. Just because someone becomes jewpilled later in life (and in Luther's case, it was *far too late*) doesnt mean they were earlier in life. In fact, Hitler himself admits he was a normie-con up until the war who had no issue with the jews at all and didn't really make the connection until he ended up in the city and was surrounded by (((bolshevism))).