New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
> 100 is always going to be the mean

Sure, but the asymmetry is inevitable.

> the peak cannot be left of 100 without the right tail being much wider.

It's the sum of 3 bell-curves each having their own mean. Naturally it implies that the resulting graph is not a bell-curve. It's close in this case though.

> the only way your position is realistic is if it's multiple normal distributions by race

Which they are. See the graph in my comment on the post I linked.
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Today's "100 IQ" is about 30 points higher than when they started taking the tests.

Not sure why.
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
your graph is wrong though.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
What is wrong about that? I told you what the math is. The graphs (both) reflect that correctly.
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
no, not even close. go back to numerical analysis.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Not an argument, dismissed.
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
you say one thing and your graph shows another. i already explained the problem. go learn to read graphs.
Toast message