New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You must log in or sign up to comment
22 comments:
14
Delon on scored.co
1 year ago 14 points (+0 / -0 / +14Score on mirror ) 1 child
yes rabbi peterstein, now tell us, who are these 12%
part on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 2 children
> yes rabbi peterstein, now tell us, who are these 12%

It's MOSTLY Blacks!!!
  
FUN FACT 146 : USA Blacks are retarded, and Genes prove why they are retarded in negro DNA on US soil! Half of USA Blacks are RETARDED!
===

https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/13zgNfmB7Z/x/c/4JFpoRNJRov

= = = =

and :
    
FUN FACT 236 : Scientific Factual Videos about Black IQ due to DNA is Deleted often by ALL web sites!
====
  
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/15HvBffY8G/x/c/4OZp8ubn9iT
RealWildRanter on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
> ~~USA~~ ALL ~~B~~blacks are retarded

There, fixed it for you.
ElectricSamurai on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
What if they're forklift certified though??
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
This assumes the IQ distribution is a bell-curve centered around some value in the US. Given the "diversity" of the country, there is a significant portion on the left (<100 IQ) that is higher. The left and right side are not mirrored, the left side is rather like a mountain range, and the right side is roughly what the right side of a bell-curve should be.
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
IQ is definitionally rebased to 100 every year. that's an arithmetic mean. so there are never more people below or above 100 than vice versa.

what's the evidence it's not a normal distribution?
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
supposedly the YOY rebase is still going up, but not how sure whether they're just lying about it.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
If you have 1000 specimen with 100 avg IQ and 1000 specimen with 50 avg IQ, you don't get a normal distribution. You get 2 bell-curves, and if you sum it up, the resulting graph will have a valley in the middle.

So mathematically it is well plausible.

I recently created a [post](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1994fUigZq/iq-distribution-in-the-us-based-/c) about this topic, and 2 comments elaborating on it. One of those comments has the graphs in details.

It appears similar to a bell-curve, but aside from the total average being lower, the right side is steeper than the left side. There is no horizontal mirroring.

Also the normalization can work in various ways. Assume Whites have an average of 100, it means the actual average in the US must be around 95, whereas in Japan it's ~105, Norway ~102, for blacks in Africa ~70.

This would also explain why blacks in the US have 80... if the average is already moved down to what would be 95, and they score 80 whereas 100 is their average, it means it's actual score (with Whites as 100 average) is somewhere around 70-75. In Africa it's 70, so that would fit better.
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
eh, there are a lot of issues with this analysis.

again, definitionally, 100 is the arithmetic mean and they rebase it regularly to match, so unless they're violating their own definitions, 100 is always going to be the mean. so your graph is just wrong. the peak cannot be left of 100 without the right tail being much wider.

virtually everything in humans is a normal distribution. the only way your position is realistic is if it's multiple normal distributions by race, such that when you take any "diverse" country, it'd be multi-modal based on the demographic makeup.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
> 100 is always going to be the mean

Sure, but the asymmetry is inevitable.

> the peak cannot be left of 100 without the right tail being much wider.

It's the sum of 3 bell-curves each having their own mean. Naturally it implies that the resulting graph is not a bell-curve. It's close in this case though.

> the only way your position is realistic is if it's multiple normal distributions by race

Which they are. See the graph in my comment on the post I linked.
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Today's "100 IQ" is about 30 points higher than when they started taking the tests.

Not sure why.
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
your graph is wrong though.
Formerlurker92 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Oh that's terrifying. And makes perfect sense
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
It's more like 8% black, 2% spic, and 2% White. Not weighted per capita.
Erase99 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Shabbos goy Peterson should be dismissed out of hand.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
If cotton picking (or manual labor in general) were made into a competitive team sport, rap music were outlawed and the welfare state dismantled, and the (((media))) driven out with pointy sticks, that 12% would become useful pretty fast. And hopefully be willing to leave to form their own country.
Toast message