1984 account with some insight
(twitter.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
>The jewish people are the best of the human species, created to know their creator and worship him, and worthy of having slaves to serve them. And if they will not have slaves of other peoples, they would have to enslave their brothers. Therefore, we are commanded to possess those for our service
--some rabbi, quoted from Shahak's *jewish history*. And there's plenty more where that came from.
I agree wholeheartedly that Christians, particularly White Christians, are the inheritors of the New Covenant, and that God has wholly rejected the jews. But we can be that without having to embrace jewish "scriptures" like the OT. I'm not saying *everything* in there is bad, just most of it, and you have to *really* keep a sharp eye on it to separate out what is good and useful, and what is kike babbling.
>The modern jews PROBABLY are not the ancient Israelites
There's no *probably* about it; they are completely and entirely a different genetic entity, twisted by centuries of inbreeding and devil worship into a crude mockery of God's greatest creation. https://files.catbox.moe/ykfrf8.png. They have of course usurped the title specifically to fool gullible judeo-"christians" into supporting them.
>some rabbi
Who gives a fuck what some sheckle hording pedo has to say about *anything,* especially in a book that does not pertain to him?
Every single race and species that has existed has taken slaves. Personally I think slavery is abominable and would rather that it would cease to exist.
>I'm not saying everything in there is bad, just most of it
Ok, let's take an example that gets passed around as "bad." Jacob deceiving Shechem. Oy VeY tHe JeWs aLlOw ThEmSeLvEs tO LiE!! The average churchgoer says there is absolutely no justification for lying, which I agree with in some cases, but the scripture tells us a different story. I'll summarize the story in case you're unfamiliar.
>Shechem defiled a daughter of Jacob, then asked Jacob for the girl to marry. Jacob said "yes, but it is our law that your entire people be circumcised in order to marry into our nation. Then our nations will exchange many women between each other." Shechem agreed and the entire town circumcised themselves. While they were recovering from their self inflicted wounds, the sons of Jacob fell on them and slaughtered them with the sword.
Here is the moral of the story, if your people is dishonored by strangers, then it is permissible to lie to them and kill them. Today we see the unwashed hordes of the heathens showing up on the shores of Europe raping our sisters. What is justified by scripture? While the churches preach tolerance, peace and continued migration, scripture gives us a different lesson.
Is it good to lie for convenience or self serving? NO. In no case. But only to provide for your people against one who would dishonor or destroy them.
Jesus tells us when anything is permissible by the faithful. When something is done in love for your people, to save them from demise or to protect them from dishonor, there is no sin in action as long as that action is taken in absolute faith toward God. All the commandments hang on one, love thy neighbor even as you love yourself. This is the purpose to everything in the OT and New.
I'm not saying God *doesn't* want us to do that. I'm just saying that the correct justification for this does not come from jewish "scriptures".
>Who gives a fuck what some sheckle hording pedo has to say about anything, especially in a book that does not pertain to him?
You retarded or something? It's not just *some rabbit*, ALL JEWS believe this. It is taught to all of them. They quite literally believe that every jew is God incarnate and the entire world exists to serve them. I have plenty of other quotes demonstrating this.
>Here is the moral of the story, if your people is dishonored by strangers, then it is permissible to lie to them and kill them.
How can you read genesis 34 and *not* see how it is a case study in absolute peak kike behavior? What's next, are you going to defend purim too? Now that I've started paying attention, I'm quite surprised at the amount of /ourguys/ who are otherwise quite opposed to the jews who still derive most of their worldview from *jewish scriptures*. If the NT, written by *actual Christians*, says the same things, why not just stick with that?
And I care even less about how ALL JEWS interpret the OT that doesn't apply to them anyway. It's like atheists quoting out of context scripture at Christians. Who gives a fuck?
The OT justifies national behavior. When our people are pressed by an enemy, we are to react in any way. This is permissible by God. This is what is taught in the OT. This is not the theme in the NT and the hyper focus on the NT is one of the many reasons why Christianity is so fucked right now. The NT gives reason behind the OT, and that reason is love in one's brothers and faith in God, but the OT gives us scriptural justification in wrath and war against the infidel.
>What's next, are you going to defend purim too?
At no point have I defended jewish holidays, Mosaic law or traditions.
>If the NT, written by actual Christians, says the same things, why not just stick with that?
Because it doesn't say the same thing unless it is contextualized by the OT.
Well you should, because that is going to determine how they act, how they behave, and what their attack methods against us are going to be. Ignore that, and you won't be anywhere *near* adequately prepared to counter them and fight back.
>It's like atheists quoting out of context scripture at Christians.
atheists aren't trying to exterminate us from the face of the earth.
>The OT justifies national behavior. When our people are pressed by an enemy, we are to react in any way. This is permissible by God.
I'm not saying it isn't. How many times must I repeat this? Just because the broken clock happened to be right twice a day doesn't mean it is to be trusted for the rest of the time.
>and the hyper focus on the NT is one of the many reasons why Christianity is so fucked right now.
Not true. There *is* no hyper focus on the NT right now, but I wish there was.
>but the OT gives us scriptural justification in wrath and war against the infidel.
You're just cherry picking the parts you like. The OT also says to mutilate the genitalia of infant boys. Should we keep doing that too?
>At no point have I defended jewish holidays, Mosaic law or traditions.
You're doing it now. The OT *is* the "mosaic law". What do you think leviticus and numbers are? Everything that came after that (the zohar, talmud, etc) was just a *further* bastardization and twisting of what the jews had already bastardized and twisted once.
>Because it doesn't say the same thing unless it is contextualized by the OT.
So *briefly contextualize* it, recognize that the rest of the OT is largely jewish nonsense, and move on.
I have been debating these kikes for the past 10 years. I know very well how they operate.
>atheists aren't trying to exterminate us from the face of the earth
They are.
>Just because the broken clock happened to be right twice a day doesn't mean it is to be trusted for the rest of the time.
It was right about everything. The coming of Christ, the destruction of the jewry, the breaking of the covenant, the nature of the jews.
>There is no hyper focus on the NT right now, but I wish there was
Go tell a modernist Christian that the bible calls homosexuality an abomination and see what the response is. "That's the OT, it's obsolete!"
>You're just cherry picking the parts you like. The OT also says to mutilate the genitalia of infant boys.
That is the Mosaic law. That is not the permissible law of nature. This is where you're hung up. The Mosaic law is finished. Jesus fulfilled it. Circumcision is nothing, and it always was nothing. The laws in Duet and Lev are meant ONLY for the ancient Israelites, period. The lessons we get from the saints is not at all connected to the mosaic law.
>The OT is the "mosaic law"
Wrong. The OT contains history and the prophets. Only a select few books are related at all to the law given by Moses.
>So briefly contextualize it, recognize that the rest of the OT is largely jewish nonsense, and move on.
If a man murders and innocent woman, what should come of him? Please use only the NT to justify your answer.